|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:47 pm
We all know that you must type semi lliterated in the ED for someone to take you seriously right? bECausE tYpInG lyke dis.... Is not acceptable. I completely understand this. What I don't understand, that many Grammar nazis, will only point out your few grammatical mistakes, when you are winning the debate. For me being dyslexic, this get really tiresome real quick. Everytime I stump someone with my logic, The Nazis tend to do something like this.... "I'm not going to listen to someone who could not tell the difference between 'your' and 'you're'. Or 'there' and 'thier'." Am I the only one is sick of this kind of nonsense?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:52 pm
It is ridiculous that they do that, and most of the time I don't notice the error until the Nazi points it out lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm
I dont care if someone's a grammar nazi. The only time I care is when they dodge giving a decent reply by flaming the other person for misspelling something like "Phlegm".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:58 pm
The Tragic Mime I dont care if someone's a grammar nazi. The only time I care is when they dodge giving a decent reply by flaming the other person for misspelling something like "Phlegm". They do tend to skip pass the discussion, only to correct everyone's mistakes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:22 pm
Now, when someone makes an error, and I quote them, I correct their spelling and stuff. I don't point it out, I just correct it in the quote.
Earlier today someone said "aggrange" or something like that when they meant to say "arrange". I kind of made fun of them for it because they were being an all-round idiot.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:50 pm
It's a logical fallacy. Point that out and demand a response or report them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:57 pm
Siphilis It's a logical fallacy. Point that out and demand a response or report them. Yikes. Siphi-sama, you and your logical fallacies.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:49 pm
I might mention a persons' grammar and spelling if I can't actually understand them, but it's ususally after a response to the topic at hand. I'll also point it out if someone misspells something in their response while they're critisizing others for it. I'll admit that my spelling isn't perfect, though, so I dont' ususally attack others on it.
The only time I've ever said I don't want to debate someone because of their spelling was with tererun, but only because she's a troll for other reasons.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:58 pm
It's essentially chasing a red herring. Similar to asking "would you personally abort?" in an abortion thread. It's beside the point and simply aims to discredit the poster and put him/her on the defensive.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:07 pm
It amuses me to insult people based on their intelligence. Barring dyslexia, there is no excuse to bastardize English. Yes, the opinions of the unintelligent hold no water in my mind. Therefore, if you forcibly sodomize English, your opinion is useless.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:10 pm
Can I bring up a question to debate? At what point does it become too much? I mean, if one consistently misspells things, in every post they make, that might be. If one use chat speak or l33t all the time, that might be too much. But what if it's only a few errors? Everyone is bound to make a few mistakes-but, if the general consensus is "If you can't spell correctly, you're an idiot", when does it reach that point?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:10 pm
I'm a grammer freak, but I don't ridicule people if they make a typo... Hell, it's hard sometimes when you're typing fast to catch every little error... Sometimes I will point it out, but to be helpful, not mean.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:12 pm
It depends.
I've run into instances where I honestly had to decode the post before I could reply.
However, I sometimes get in a couple of fast moving debates at once so I don't double check my spelling and make a few mistakes. Therefore, I can understand other people doing the same thing.
My rule of thumb is if I can understand want they meant, I honestly don't care.
However, I have learned that spelling correctly gives other people the impression you're more intelligent and can help you win debates. That’s why I always type my replies in Word first. wink .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:16 pm
I'm somewhat of a Grammar Nazi, but I do focus on the discussion first.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:25 pm
Emera_Leigh It depends. I've run into instances where I honestly had to decode the post before could reply. However, I sometimes get in a couple of fast moving debates at once so I don't double check my spelling and make a few mistakes. Therefore, I can understand other people doing the same thing. My rule of thumb is if I can understand want they meant, I honestly don't care. However, I have learned that spelling correctly gives other people the impression you're more intelligent and can help you win debates. That’s why I always type my replies in Word first. wink . It's often the same with me. I am a major stickler for spelling but since I've caught myself making mistakes while typing fast I'll let it slide. If I do comment on their writing I also make sure to include a reply to their post-always. Of course just by looking at the post and how good it's argument is usually clues you in to if their spelling is accidentally bad or just plain old stinky. If it gets too bad I just won't answer or reply. After all, I can't answer them if I don't know what their asking-right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|