|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 1:48 pm
Here's an idea. Rather than discussing evolution vs. creationism, my issue I want to debate is why the two are even being debated. Does creationism have any place in school at all? Separation of church of state is a foundation of modern government. I'm not sure that it should even by in a social studies or philosophy class. To me, it belongs only in religious buildings, it shouldn't be allowed in an academic building, if you want creationism, go to a church or catholic school. However, feel free to disagree with me. Am I taking it to far? Not far enough? Am I just plain wrong?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 4:08 pm
Okay, I'm moving this to the main forum because I think it would do better there. Life Issues is more of personal issues (I'll change the subforum name to make it clearer).
But as for what you are discussing...
No, I do not think creationism belongs in schools. However, in colleges or universities I think it is fine. Most definitely if you are taking a philosophy class. You have to have an understanding of people's beliefs (whether it is creationism, evolution, or whatever) than analyze those beliefs to find all the good points and inconsistencies. And just to understand where people are coming from in philosophical discussions. :]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
brother stevenson Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 4:45 pm
In a college/university it's all right, but in a non-catholic High School and whatnot seems rather iffy. Maybe part of an elective class, but not really part of the required curriculum.
Personally I never learned about it all that much in school. I mostly picked it up and the like. Only time it was mentioned was in History class was when it actually was part of the discussion, such as Scopes Monkey Trial. Briefly mentioned but still mentioned. Learning about stuff is interesting nonetheless, just as long as it's not stuffed down your throat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 11:46 pm
Famorge Maybe part of an elective class, but not really part of the required curriculum. I definitely agree with that part. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
brother stevenson Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:30 am
(I go missing for a week or so and I find a few new topics, how great!)
Well, you can't keep religion out of our schools, that's just a fact. People will bring what they know and understand to be the truth into any situation or place. I pretty much agree with you, Scrya, but an elective Theology class would be nice, like what Famorge said. There is a slight problem with that notion, though. There will always be teachers that only teach what they believe and it'd be pretty difficult to find an impartial instructor.
Evolution has been a (legal) part of modern science for decades now, human evolution is another subject entirely. My biology teacher refuses to teach human evolution because of the problems involved, which is a pretty smooth move on his part.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:03 am
Leuven (I go missing for a week or so and I find a few new topics, how great!) Well, you can't keep religion out of our schools, that's just a fact. People will bring what they know and understand to be the truth into any situation or place. I pretty much agree with you, Scrya, but an elective Theology class would be nice, like what Famorge said. There is a slight problem with that notion, though. There will always be teachers that only teach what they believe and it'd be pretty difficult to find an impartial instructor. Evolution has been a (legal) part of modern science for decades now, human evolution is another subject entirely. My biology teacher refuses to teach human evolution because of the problems involved, which is a pretty smooth move on his part. I don't think that biology teacher should refuse to teach evolution. He's shirking his duties to teach to the fullest of his abilities. School should be as impartial to religion, politics as possible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brother stevenson Captain
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:30 am
Well, I think it's possible to teach about those sort of things and be pretty unbiased about it. The way to go about it, I believe, is to have people of different beliefs and cultures that specialize in that subject, such as philosophy, look at the topic and determine what has to be taught and how it should be taught, in the course.
Professors have to get their syllabus approved by someone/commitee? (correct me if I'm wrong) and all that before the semester. Plus, they are often in meetings with other professors to exchange teaching methods, etc, and hopefully that environment is a diverse one for more input.
Of course, there is still the possibility of bias depending on what type of college or university you go to because some places are not very diverse. I had a history high school teacher who went to a pretty much an rich and all-white school and was just shocked when she left home for college and see the history courses teaching stuff she has never even been told about. And I don't believe that's because in was a HS to college transition. Anyway, my point was, if it is not a diverse setting, you don't get anywhere in removing bias if all your colleagues pretty much just agree with you, have same ideas as you, etc, etc in the first place.
Where I live, it's a pretty liberal and diverse place so it's very (not to say that you can see some really blatantly discriminatory things, but it's generally frowned upon). In my personal experience and opinion, a professor in my first philosophy class was really wonderful and fair and balanced about discussing religion and other things. And there were Christians, agnostic, atheist, Muslim, etc etc. Even a Scientologist (most people would freak out, say, "UR STOOPID!") and no one was really up in arms and the teacher treated everyone fairly. Pretty cool. :]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:43 pm
Scrya Leuven (I go missing for a week or so and I find a few new topics, how great!) Well, you can't keep religion out of our schools, that's just a fact. People will bring what they know and understand to be the truth into any situation or place. I pretty much agree with you, Scrya, but an elective Theology class would be nice, like what Famorge said. There is a slight problem with that notion, though. There will always be teachers that only teach what they believe and it'd be pretty difficult to find an impartial instructor. Evolution has been a (legal) part of modern science for decades now, human evolution is another subject entirely. My biology teacher refuses to teach human evolution because of the problems involved, which is a pretty smooth move on his part. I don't think that biology teacher should refuse to teach evolution. He's shirking his duties to teach to the fullest of his abilities. School should be as impartial to religion, politics as possible.I disagree! biggrin . . . But not about the "impartial to religion, etc" part. That's what this world needs. Really, all he is required to do is to teach the theory, not the history of evolution, which isn't very controversial. My devout friends would be very upset if they were required to test on something they didn't believe. Save beliefs for outside the (traditional) science room, I say! Just by teaching the theory, he allows the students to make their own connections and understand the world the way they see fit.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:54 pm
Leuven Scrya Leuven (I go missing for a week or so and I find a few new topics, how great!) Well, you can't keep religion out of our schools, that's just a fact. People will bring what they know and understand to be the truth into any situation or place. I pretty much agree with you, Scrya, but an elective Theology class would be nice, like what Famorge said. There is a slight problem with that notion, though. There will always be teachers that only teach what they believe and it'd be pretty difficult to find an impartial instructor. Evolution has been a (legal) part of modern science for decades now, human evolution is another subject entirely. My biology teacher refuses to teach human evolution because of the problems involved, which is a pretty smooth move on his part. I don't think that biology teacher should refuse to teach evolution. He's shirking his duties to teach to the fullest of his abilities. School should be as impartial to religion, politics as possible.I disagree! biggrin . . . But not about the "impartial to religion, etc" part. That's what this world needs. Really, all he is required to do is to teach the theory, not the history of evolution, which isn't very controversial. My devout friends would be very upset if they were required to test on something they didn't believe. Save beliefs for outside the (traditional) science room, I say! Just by teaching the theory, he allows the students to make their own connections and understand the world the way they see fit. Wait, I don't get what you're saying. You say the history of the evolution is the non-controversial part, but then go on to say that he teaches the theory, and that doing so is what is right to allow students their own choices. Which part is he not teaching? You said before that "refuses to teach human evolution". Does he or doesn't he? Or are you differentiating between evolution and human evolution?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:10 am
Scrya Leuven Scrya Leuven (I go missing for a week or so and I find a few new topics, how great!) Well, you can't keep religion out of our schools, that's just a fact. People will bring what they know and understand to be the truth into any situation or place. I pretty much agree with you, Scrya, but an elective Theology class would be nice, like what Famorge said. There is a slight problem with that notion, though. There will always be teachers that only teach what they believe and it'd be pretty difficult to find an impartial instructor. Evolution has been a (legal) part of modern science for decades now, human evolution is another subject entirely. My biology teacher refuses to teach human evolution because of the problems involved, which is a pretty smooth move on his part. I don't think that biology teacher should refuse to teach evolution. He's shirking his duties to teach to the fullest of his abilities. School should be as impartial to religion, politics as possible.I disagree! biggrin . . . But not about the "impartial to religion, etc" part. That's what this world needs. Really, all he is required to do is to teach the theory, not the history of evolution, which isn't very controversial. My devout friends would be very upset if they were required to test on something they didn't believe. Save beliefs for outside the (traditional) science room, I say! Just by teaching the theory, he allows the students to make their own connections and understand the world the way they see fit. Wait, I don't get what you're saying. You say the history of the evolution is the non-controversial part, but then go on to say that he teaches the theory, and that doing so is what is right to allow students their own choices. Which part is he not teaching? You said before that "refuses to teach human evolution". Does he or doesn't he? Or are you differentiating between evolution and human evolution?I apologize for not being clear earlier! redface Yes, I mean that the concept of human evolution and just plain ol' evolution are a bit different. I've always taken human evolution to be more specific and a tad more controversial. (Stop me if I'm lecturing!) To clear things up, he doesn't teach the side that says mankind descends from apes, but does teach about general adaptations and the theorized history of other species. . . . I don't know if I'm making sense yet . . . Let me know if you have any questions!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:03 pm
I don't think ID should be taught in schools. I think schools should remain secular in nature, since secularism is a middle ground most people can agree on. We are NOT a truly christian nation. People say they identify as christians, but many do not go to church more than the major holidays, and celebrating capitalism. I could be wrong, but this is what I have observed. Not to mention all the other faiths that would be offended if only the christian truth was being taught
I think that teachers should always encourage kids to question what they say and search for their own truth, but everything taught should be secular.
I mean, if you're a christian, you can talk to your kids about what the "Real" truth is. I would if christian truths were being taught.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|