|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 3:12 pm
I'm just going to make a thread right here to throw in articles for discussion and reference on topics pertaining to scientific studies and technology. Hope its helpful. ninja Starting with this... Science News Sensor SensibilityThe mathematics of shapes is illuminating the structure of wireless sensor networks Erica KlarreichImagine a future in which billions of tiny computers are embedded into buildings, streets, fields, or even our bodies. These devices might monitor weather, traffic, crop conditions, the progression of diseases, or a host of other variables. The tiny computerized sensors would spontaneously organize into networks that could adjust their structures and functions in response to the information that they pick up. That future might be just around the corner. Researchers have already deployed networks with dozens of matchbox-size sensors in a wide range of applications. Sensor networks are tracking the movement of zebras in Kenya and determining bullet trajectories in military field tests. Coming soon, many engineers predict, are cheap sensors the size of dust particles. Those high-tech specks will measure temperature, vibration, noise, light, and more. The question, the engineers say, is not whether these smart-dust sensors will someday pervade our environment, but when. Full article.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 4:06 pm
Ahh nanotechology is getting huge resurch by the government, their mainly interested in making a suite that increases the users strength, to cleaning up the environment. but this is more on climate and disease montering. Before I go onto that theres a cool thing that their working on is a dinimotic oxygen molecule that is contained inside those guys, this would allow the user to stay underwater for six hors at a time, since it has high density of oxygen inside. What they diden't say is if these dust things pose a health threat and are they biodegradable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 4:16 pm
Oh fun now the govenrment can use it to figure out what the hell I'm doing.
Still that's kickass.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 4:58 pm
I was thinking this could be a possible avenue for tracking/planning an economy without currency. Though I'm not so sure these things are good for the enviroment. And there's sure to be plenty of abuses before then.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:24 pm
Demon Kagerou I was thinking this could be a possible avenue for tracking/planning an economy without currency. Though I'm not so sure these things are good for the enviroment. And there's sure to be plenty of abuses before then. Big Brother likes this. cool
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:25 pm
Demon Kagerou I was thinking this could be a possible avenue for tracking/planning an economy without currency. Though I'm not so sure these things are good for the enviroment. And there's sure to be plenty of abuses before then. How so in track planning?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:26 pm
Contra mundus Oh fun now the govenrment can use it to figure out what the hell I'm doing. Still that's kickass. Makes you want to put away that dam Marx book and reach for Newton.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 7:32 pm
muhahahhahaha
muahhahahahahah
Transhumanism... >.>.......<.<
nano socialism.......
True end to humanity! (cause we wont be human!)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 7:35 pm
Steven Hawkings Contra mundus Oh fun now the govenrment can use it to figure out what the hell I'm doing. Still that's kickass. Makes you want to put away that dam Marx book and reach for Newton. Newton. Great at physics... incredibly odd about everything else. There's a famous story about Newton sticking a long needle behind his eye just to see what it would do. It's suspected he had mercury poisoning from his enthusiastic dabbling in alchemy. There's a rather unnerving aspect to humankind, which is exposed by the history of physics. We figure out how to calculate the rotation of distant planets around our sun and discover the laws which cause it.... while at the same time being perfectly incapable of telling anyone where babies come from.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:19 pm
Demon Kagerou Steven Hawkings Contra mundus Oh fun now the govenrment can use it to figure out what the hell I'm doing. Still that's kickass. Makes you want to put away that dam Marx book and reach for Newton. Newton. Great at physics... incredibly odd about everything else. There's a famous story about Newton sticking a long needle behind his eye just to see what it would do. It's suspected he had mercury poisoning from his enthusiastic dabbling in alchemy. There's a rather unnerving aspect to humankind, which is exposed by the history of physics. We figure out how to calculate the rotation of distant planets around our sun and discover the laws which cause it.... while at the same time being perfectly incapable of telling anyone where babies come from. He owned 33 bibles and put them around the house and wrote in them. He was trying to get the Phosphor's Stone. He was also interested in humans eyes and light, though I don't know when they took place. I'm not shocked he go poisoned, at the time people put that on your skin as a means of curing you. As for babies, people give lame stories, as a means of don't exposing kids to that context until older, though if they learn it a a younger age it wont be as shocking. I didn't know until almost seventh grade.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:22 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 muhahahhahaha muahhahahahahah Transhumanism... >.>.......<.< nano socialism....... True end to humanity! (cause we wont be human!) We would be human, having machines in you makes you know less unless they can alter your DNA and change your chroms. though i doubt more would need to be done also.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:21 am
Steven Hawkings As for babies, people give lame stories, as a means of don't exposing kids to that context until older, though if they learn it a a younger age it wont be as shocking. I didn't know until almost seventh grade. I mean beside the obvious. We knew more about physics and geology before anything much about how biology worked. It's a historical curiosity because... really, concepts like evolution and natural selection are so much more obvious to behold than any answer physics could come up with. People thousands upon thousands of years ago had considered it... yet it took until the Victorian age for people to take it as serious science. Robert Hooke discovered "cells" and named them such in Newton's time. When peering into microscopes became popular, a folk-theory abound that sperm cells where pre-formed men... they called them homunculi... and apparently believed all animals were like this. So humans where just inflated versions of these creatures. At least... one has to admire the veracity of human imagination in this case.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 8:13 am
Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 muhahahhahaha muahhahahahahah Transhumanism... >.>.......<.< nano socialism....... True end to humanity! (cause we wont be human!) We would be human, having machines in you makes you know less unless they can alter your DNA and change your chroms. though i doubt more would need to be done also. yeah they can and it does make you less "human" by todays standards. If your able to have telepathy through wireless interwebs in your brain, enhanced biological systems..... come on.. Its called proto-human where man creates and takes over his own evolution ^.^ which is the way it should be!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:05 am
I should probably mention that just as we're moving closer to having people to be more like computers.... we're teaching our computers to be more like humans. It is such that cognitive science and artificial intelligence often work together mutually. Its complicated because in some ways Descartes was on to something. The mind operates on its own, and it is quite able to behave independent of the person's awareness of it. There are studies showing what people are doing when they day dream or really dream. Even when it appears their senses are distracted by the present, their mind is processing planned and past experiences, plotting out social networking and working out complex problems. I will also mention just to be annoying, that the brain may be organized along anarchist principles. ninja Science News Net Heads Huge numbers of brain cells may navigate small worldsAbout 40 years ago, the late psychologist Stanley Milgram tapped into the commonsense notion that "it's a small world." Milgram asked 60 people to send a folder to a certain individual whom none of them knew. Participants were given a little information about the target person and asked to mail the folder to a friend or acquaintance who, in their view, was more likely to know the stranger than they were. Each recipient of the folder was asked to do the same, until the material reached its destination *** Strogatz and Watts also demonstrated the relevance of the small-world idea to the array of 282 brain cells in worms called nematodes. Small-world networks have a distinctive structure: There's a cluster of nodes, each connected to its immediate neighbors, with a few that connect to distant nodes. This structure enhances the power and efficiency of these systems, Strogatz and Watts argued. More and more neuroscientists agree. Motivated by Milgram and his mathematical progeny, researchers are now devising models grounded in the small-world effect to explain how the human brain works. These scientists are looking for small-world setups within the brain's massive, interconnected cell networks and for moment-to-moment electrical manipulations that, they suspect, foster thinking and learning. Their efforts are a sharp departure from popular brain-imaging efforts to pinpoint neural niches that specialize in particular mental capabilities. *** For now, remarks Sporns, the new findings indicate that related brain networks operate at different electrical frequencies, each of which acts as a unique channel for transmitting information. The brain needs no central-control mechanism to direct mental life; interactions within and among networks do the trick. The possibility that the brain steeps itself in flexible, chaotic activity is "an attractive idea," notes neuroscientist Karl Friston of University College London. He says that Bassett's team now needs to formulate a theory of how low- and high-frequency synchronized networks collectively respond to mental challenges. Perking up The notion that the brain thrives on chaos, in a mathematical sense, comes as no shock to neuroscientist Walter J. Freeman of the University of California, Berkeley. For the past 20 years, he has argued that the brain churns out a cascade of chaotic electrical activity that serves as a "get ready" state. From there, he theorizes, vast expanses of brain tissue shift into electrical-activity patterns that organize thought and perception. *** Both his group and Bassett's team have found hubs of particularly intense activity within networks of synchronized brain cells. These hubs arise where neural connections are especially numerous. However, fMRI investigators such as Friston still see value in the search for brain regions with specialized duties. Activity hubs probably integrate information shuttled in from other brain locations, Friston proposes. Etc.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:09 pm
Demon Kagerou Steven Hawkings As for babies, people give lame stories, as a means of don't exposing kids to that context until older, though if they learn it a a younger age it wont be as shocking. I didn't know until almost seventh grade. I mean beside the obvious. We knew more about physics and geology before anything much about how biology worked. It's a historical curiosity because... really, concepts like evolution and natural selection are so much more obvious to behold than any answer physics could come up with. People thousands upon thousands of years ago had considered it... yet it took until the Victorian age for people to take it as serious science. Robert Hooke discovered "cells" and named them such in Newton's time. When peering into microscopes became popular, a folk-theory abound that sperm cells where pre-formed men... they called them homunculi... and apparently believed all animals were like this. So humans where just inflated versions of these creatures. At least... one has to admire the veracity of human imagination in this case. Medical science opened up with De Venice. If you ever seen his drawings hey are accurate and most detailed. hough brain sugary was known and worked well in Roman times, they even knew of serial living quarter and cleaning of wounds. Removal of eye contacts was preformed also. Those operated on survived mostly. The Church held back any development for 1,000 years. then power started to wane. While serious resurch started in England in the 19th century it has been going on far longer. Robert Hook as great as he was, accused Newton of stealing his ideas; while he had a understanding of gravity. Every time Newton solved something new, he always said he stole them. He was smart as a he was always seemed to target Newton, which caused Newton to have a mental breakdown and get bed ridden. Though his part here was jus a tid bit for facts. Physics and biology all have been dampened by people for what they wish to explain to others its truth, to others its knocking on god. Why else is cloning banned in he US? While bacterial cloning is legal thats it, I find this unjust to allow this to occur.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|