|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:39 pm
Psalm 137 (King James Version) 1By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion. 2We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. 3For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. 4How shall we sing the LORD's song in a strange land? 5If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. 6If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy. 7Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Rase it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof. 8O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. 9Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. 1By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion. 2We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. 3For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. 4How shall we sing the LORD's song in a strange land? 5If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. 6If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy. 7Remember, O LORD, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who said, Rase it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof. 8O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. 9Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.Psalm 137. It’s a beautiful passage, and there several hymns made out of it. Except, you know, they always leave out that last bit. In fact, nobody ever says anything about that last bit, ever. You wouldn’t know it existed. Why is that? Because it’s creepy. Dashing their children against the rocks? Ew! Come to think of it, there are quite a few passages that people just sort of ignore. And yet, there are all these people who claim that they believe in the Bible unfailingly, and so on and so forth, while ignoring all those shifty passages. There are lost of others, like 1 Samuel 18, about Jonathan and David. 1 Samuel 18 (New American Standard Bible) 1Now it came about when he had finished speaking to Saul, that (A)the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and (B)Jonathan loved him as himself. 2Saul took him that day and (C)did not let him return to his father's house. 3Then (D)Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Not to even begin talking about all the passages on Marriage. So tell me - What do you think about all these ignored passages? - What do you think it means to “Follow the Bible”? - How do we judge what rules to follow, and which ones to ignore? - (And whatever else you have to say on the subject, or other passages you’d like to add.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:56 pm
Psalm 137 (New International Version) 8 O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us- 9 he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks. <--- Here is a somewhat more clear version of that passage. I don't think God really wants you to dash Babies' heads against rocks, but that's sort of beside the point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:41 am
*g* I always wondered what people who claim that the Bible has to be followed word by word are doing in their spare time...
Now back to topic. Following the Bible is somewhat difficult. Psalm 137 shows pretty well that the Bible has to be interpreted more often than one might think. I didn't even understand what was meant by the described passage until I looked it up in my German Bible. Luckily enough a footnote explained what was meant: Psalm 137 is a lament from the Israelites in the Babylonian captivity while verse 9 is a curse that expresses the harsh feelings of the Israelites towards their Babylonian masters.
In its' historical context the passage is much more understandable. It's an emotional outcry, an expression of feelings not an advice from God. If there's anything this passage tells us to do than it's something like that one has to take a look at the Jewish history before judging Israelite actions nowadays. (That's just an example, because I find it very difficult to understand or even judge Near East politics.)
The second passage is more difficult to interprete for me, because my German translation means that Jonathan loved David the same as his own life. The German word used for "covenant" ("Bund") has much more meanings than "marriage" and related meanings. Some possible synonyms for "Bund" are "tie", "alliance", even "treaty" may be used. Maybe the meaning becomes clearer when I found out what role Jonathan plays in the story about Saul and David. (Does anyone know? It's been a while since I read the last time in this story...)
To cut a long story short, understanding the Bible to be really able to follow it, is a work in progress that's impossible to finish during a lifetime. Still it's important to follow the Bible by using one's own conscience, gathering information, ask questions and trust in God for the rest.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Most of Leviticus is also ignored, with the exception of "thou shalt not lie with another man as you would a woman" bit. Seafood and polyestor are always conveniently ignored. rolleyes
I'm often accused of "picking and choosing" which parts of the Bible I believe, but to be perfectly honest, I think everyone does. I mean, honestly, what Christian seriously freaks out if they eat a little bit of animal fat?
That's really my problem with sola scriptura. There's a lot of historical context and translation issues that have to be taken into account when tackling biblical interpretation. There's those who will have you believe that everything is to be taken literally, but then you present them with something like Psalm 137 or 1 Samuel 18, and they'll start going on about symbolism and historical context. It's highly annoying.
Anyway, I also think that there's more to being Christian than just reading the rules and following them. Anyone can follow rules. But I think faith is something that, to truly be faith, should be deeply personal and extremely profound to the indvidual. It's likely impossible to ever understand the true Will of God. All we can do is do the best we can with what we've got and hope that we don't go too horribly awry. And really, I think God loves a trier.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:20 am
SinfulGuillotine Most of Leviticus is also ignored, with the exception of "thou shalt not lie with another man as you would a woman" bit. Seafood and polyestor are always conveniently ignored. rolleyes I'm often accused of "picking and choosing" which parts of the Bible I believe, but to be perfectly honest, I think everyone does. I mean, honestly, what Christian seriously freaks out if they eat a little bit of animal fat? That's really my problem with sola scriptura. There's a lot of historical context and translation issues that have to be taken into account when tackling biblical interpretation. There's those who will have you believe that everything is to be taken literally, but then you present them with something like Psalm 137 or 1 Samuel 18, and they'll start going on about symbolism and historical context. It's highly annoying. Anyway, I also think that there's more to being Christian than just reading the rules and following them. Anyone can follow rules. But I think faith is something that, to truly be faith, should be deeply personal and extremely profound to the indvidual. It's likely impossible to ever understand the true Will of God. All we can do is do the best we can with what we've got and hope that we don't go too horribly awry. And really, I think God loves a trier. Nor do I think that anyone follows the majority of the Bible's rules about say, Marriage. I am going to build on what you say, and say that I think a lot of the people sort of equate the Bible with God. Now, don't get me wrong, the Bible is God's word, and it's amazing, but as you said, there's a lot of historical and translational context that you have to take into account, and also the fact that it was penned by men. I know that when I'm feeling sad or down, or any kind of feeling, I can almost always just open the Bible and read just what I needed to at that moment, it's nothing short of amazing, frankly, but that does not mean that I feel the need to take all of the Bible Literally. Because that would just be silly, I think.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 3:20 am
I had an wonderful Bible for childs, before I handed it over with some other books to my cousins... It explained a lot of strange parts in context.
You should see every passage of the bible in its historical context as far as it is possible. And I am allowed to say it, as I am not taking the Bible literally... Okay, "Thou shalt not kill." can hardly be taken as metaphor. wink For example the seafood ( I cannot remember this part, but I think I can make something out of it): In this climate it is hard to keep seafood fresh, it is still today when you don't have modern cooling devices. God just wanted his people not to die of food poisoning. Most things can be given a reason, okay, some cannot, but maybe one day we will.
Somehow the Baha'i seem to have the most realistic perspective of religion (Baha'i respect Jewism (?), Christianity and Islam as their predecessors and say that they have the most actual prophet, because God sends a new prophet whenever he thinks one is needed.) The Bible was completed (ignoring its changes wink ) about 2000 years ago. They didn't know anything about cars, computers, antibiotics, America, etc. It should be hard for someone living in that age to read: Carriages without horses will kill if you steer them drunk... mrgreen It wouldn't have make this book very popular...
PS: I think, Kittie is right with the curse part. I cannot read the Bible at the moment, but we should have the same version.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:10 pm
Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses...
But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing:
Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy.
There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:03 pm
SpaZZtaSt!C Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses... But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing: Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy. There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....? Because that is the one that Jesus seriously and blatantly ignored, and so we figure because Jesus didn't see fit to follow it, we shouldn't either. For my part, I teach Sunday School - so I do work on Sundays, but I consider that to be okay because, well, I think it affects the life of the kids I teach in a way that's positive to God.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:55 pm
Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses... But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing: Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy. There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....? Because that is the one that Jesus seriously and blatantly ignored, and so we figure because Jesus didn't see fit to follow it, we shouldn't either. For my part, I teach Sunday School - so I do work on Sundays, but I consider that to be okay because, well, I think it affects the life of the kids I teach in a way that's positive to God. The sabbath is Saturday...just an FYI cuz the week starts on sunday and god rested on the 7th day of the week...saturday...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:25 pm
SpaZZtaSt!C Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses... But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing: Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy. There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....? Because that is the one that Jesus seriously and blatantly ignored, and so we figure because Jesus didn't see fit to follow it, we shouldn't either. For my part, I teach Sunday School - so I do work on Sundays, but I consider that to be okay because, well, I think it affects the life of the kids I teach in a way that's positive to God. The sabbath is Saturday...just an FYI cuz the week starts on sunday and god rested on the 7th day of the week...saturday... Wasn't it Saturday but they changed it do Sunday some point along the line?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 5:41 am
Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses... But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing: Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy. There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....? Because that is the one that Jesus seriously and blatantly ignored, and so we figure because Jesus didn't see fit to follow it, we shouldn't either. For my part, I teach Sunday School - so I do work on Sundays, but I consider that to be okay because, well, I think it affects the life of the kids I teach in a way that's positive to God. The sabbath is Saturday...just an FYI cuz the week starts on sunday and god rested on the 7th day of the week...saturday... Wasn't it Saturday but they changed it do Sunday some point along the line? ....possibly The only reason I even brought any of this up is my pastor did a sermon on this about a month ago and this thread made me remember...but yeah, he said Saturday, and untill then I had always thought it was Sunday.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:44 pm
SpaZZtaSt!C Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Violet_Abyss SpaZZtaSt!C Now, I haven't read the bible all the way through [I'm a horrible christian, I know] so i don't really know all the ignored verses... But one thing that always gets me is that there is a Commandment, that is routinely ignored, and no one says a damned thing: Remember the Sabbath Day and Keep it Holy. There was a man refered to in the bible that was picking up sticks off the ground on the sabbath, and he was put to death. No, I'm obviously not suggesting that we put people who work on the sabbath to death, I'm merely wondering why we follow 9 out of the 10 commandments, and simply omit that one as if its not important....? Because that is the one that Jesus seriously and blatantly ignored, and so we figure because Jesus didn't see fit to follow it, we shouldn't either. For my part, I teach Sunday School - so I do work on Sundays, but I consider that to be okay because, well, I think it affects the life of the kids I teach in a way that's positive to God. The sabbath is Saturday...just an FYI cuz the week starts on sunday and god rested on the 7th day of the week...saturday... Wasn't it Saturday but they changed it do Sunday some point along the line? ....possibly The only reason I even brought any of this up is my pastor did a sermon on this about a month ago and this thread made me remember...but yeah, he said Saturday, and untill then I had always thought it was Sunday. Hmm... ugh, I'm too tired to think. *collapses into a puddle*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:09 am
Yes, the Bible is God's revealed Word to us, but it is also an historical document. Almost the entirety of the Old Testament and New Testament is history as viewed through the eyes of the Jews, God's Chosen people. In order to understand their viewpoint, we need to examine the culture in which they lived. We must try to understand to the best of our ability why they thought the way they did in order to understand the majority of the verses in the Bible.
God guided the hands of men to write the Bible and preserve it. Through the words in the Bible God gives us a glimpse of His plan and hopes for us, but we have to dig for the Bible is trapped in time - in a time radically different from our own.
This important fact is something many people forget, and it is why I cannot agree with taking the Bible literally just as I cannot agree with sola scriptura, for God did not just reveal Himself through the Bible. I of course have a long, descriptive essay on sola scriptura, but that's not really relevant with this topic, so let's save that for another day.
So in essence, I agree that the Bible simply cannot be taken literally and that the ignored verses need to be taken in their historical and cultural context in order to be fully understood.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:51 pm
Anarya Yes, the Bible is God's revealed Word to us, but it is also an historical document. Almost the entirety of the Old Testament and New Testament is history as viewed through the eyes of the Jews, God's Chosen people. In order to understand their viewpoint, we need to examine the culture in which they lived. We must try to understand to the best of our ability why they thought the way they did in order to understand the majority of the verses in the Bible.
God guided the hands of men to write the Bible and preserve it. Through the words in the Bible God gives us a glimpse of His plan and hopes for us, but we have to dig for the Bible is trapped in time - in a time radically different from our own.
This important fact is something many people forget, and it is why I cannot agree with taking the Bible literally just as I cannot agree with sola scriptura, for God did not just reveal Himself through the Bible. I of course have a long, descriptive essay on sola scriptura, but that's not really relevant with this topic, so let's save that for another day.
So in essence, I agree that the Bible simply cannot be taken literally and that the ignored verses need to be taken in their historical and cultural context in order to be fully understood. I also think that it's important to take into context that the Bible is not by any means all there is, and that it's basically what the Catholics picked and chose and decided what the "best scriptures" were.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Violet_Abyss Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:03 pm
Colossians 2:13-17 deals with the sabbath specifically, and the entire old laws indirectly. ^-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|