|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:45 pm
Which Roger is better...
Roger with short hair(as seen in the flashback which is also the way he appeared in the musical) or Roger with long hair as seen in the movie.
I much preferred the shorter hair.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:47 pm
Short. The only reason Adam Pascal (Roger) had it long in the movie was because the director (Chris Columbus) liked it long. He chopped it off after the movie wrapped because he hated it so much.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:24 pm
He said in the commentary, "I'm never wearing my hair like that again."
Amen to that. His long hair was gross! In certain shots in the movie it looked alright... but that's about it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:16 am
I hate guys with long hair. So obviously I like the short haired Roger.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:09 pm
i like long hair... short hair looks weird.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:41 pm
Hmm... short hair. I like the long hair, but... I dunno. Short is better. :] Although it doesn't make his forehead look any smaller...>.>; [Not that it's big! -hides from Pascal fans-]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Incendiary Wit Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:46 pm
too many times he looked like a girl with the long hair in the movie.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:55 pm
And a monkey in photographs. O_o
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:08 pm
La.ra.Co.ud.ra.y He said in the commentary, "I'm never wearing my hair like that again."
Amen to that. His long hair was gross! In certain shots in the movie it looked alright... but that's about it. Even Anthony went on about how gross both of their hair looked. I really thoguht Chris Columbus was on some kind of ego trip when he made the movie ... He set it in 1989, for cryin' out loud, for the sole reason that HE LIVED IN THE LOWER EAST SIDE that year. How egoistic can you be? "Let's put me in rent somehow, hurr, hurr." Plus he didn't know a lot of stuff that anyopne who's seen the show more than once could tell you. He should have done his research... *steps off soapbox* sorry guys. I'm in a bad mood today.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:47 am
fluidstatic La.ra.Co.ud.ra.y He said in the commentary, "I'm never wearing my hair like that again."
Amen to that. His long hair was gross! In certain shots in the movie it looked alright... but that's about it. Even Anthony went on about how gross both of their hair looked. I really thoguht Chris Columbus was on some kind of ego trip when he made the movie ... He set it in 1989, for cryin' out loud, for the sole reason that HE LIVED IN THE LOWER EAST SIDE that year. How egoistic can you be? "Let's put me in rent somehow, hurr, hurr." Plus he didn't know a lot of stuff that anyopne who's seen the show more than once could tell you. He should have done his research... *steps off soapbox* sorry guys. I'm in a bad mood today. I totally agree!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:20 pm
Definately long hair the short hair was okay, but he was much more appealing in long hair! :rotfl:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:03 pm
sweetsacrificess Definately long hair the short hair was okay, but he was much more appealing in long hair! :rotfl: LION KING!!!!lol.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:41 pm
MOOvertheMOOn sweetsacrificess Definately long hair the short hair was okay, but he was much more appealing in long hair! :rotfl: LION KING!!!!lol. XDDDD Seriously.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 8:08 am
He looks so gay with short hair.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|