Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Staffies At Work
Point! What's Your Point? (Center for Jahoclave Control) Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:10 am


Columns go here; the squirrels are married.

As for work, that won't be happening here.

Also, about those TPS reports...
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:12 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#1 Paragraphs and You.
Jeff A. Van Booven

What is a paragraph? The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines it as: �A distinct division of written or printed matter that begins on a new, usually indented line, consists of one or more sentences, and typically deals with a single thought or topic or quotes one speaker's continuous words.�

So there you have what a paragraph is. And notice that nowhere does it specify how many sentences a paragraph has to be. It can be any number of sentences. Yet upper level teachers have a strange notion that paragraphs for high school students need to be five to seven sentences. Now I ask you, does that assumption fit the definition of a paragraph? No, it doesn�t.

It�s actually counter-productive to the writing of a paper because as a writer, you�re forced to include more filler into a paper that is not necessary. This filler information drags a paper on and does not help clarity or brevity of points being made. It also teaches misinformed information about structure, something you would think English teachers would be adamantly against, yet they are some of the biggest culprits.

And now, a brief interlude�

OXFORD:
We have the Holy Ellipses.

WEBSTER:
Yes, of course! The Holy Ellipses of English! 'Tis one of the sacred relics Brother English carries with him. Brother English! Bring up the Holy Ellipses!

MONKS: [chanting]
Pie Iesu domine, dona eis requiem.
Pie Iesu domine, dona eis requiem. Pie Iesu domine, dona eis requiem. Pie Iesu domine, dona eis requiem.

WEBSTER:
How does it, um-- how does it work?

OXFORD:
I know not, my liege.

WEBSTER:
Consult the Book of Grammar!

BROTHER ENGLISH:
Grammar, chapter two, verses nine to twenty-one.

SECOND BROTHER:
And Saint Steve wrote the ellipses up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy ellipses that, with it, Thou mayest punctuate Thine sentence to show pause or to omit words in Thy mercy.'
And the Lord did grin, and the people did use periods and cotton colons and semicolons and commas and question marks and syntax and diction and large chu--

ENGLISH:
Skip a bit, Brother.

SECOND BROTHER:
And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out the Holy Pen. Then, shalt thou write three periods. No more. No less. Three shalt be the number of the periods thou shalt use, and the number of the periods shall be three. Four shalt thou not use, nor either write thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once three periods, being the third period, be reached, then, usest thou thy Holy Ellipses of Antioch on thy paper, who, being grammatically correct in My sight, shall read well.'

ENGLISH:
Amen.

KNIGHTS:
Amen.

�this concludes our brief interlude.

The point of the matter is no teacher can validly claim that a paragraph must be a certain length in sentences. A paragraph is about a topic, no more, no less. If you are done with a topic and you wish to move on to a different idea, you should do so. You should not drag a paragraph on that you have nothing more to say on. This is something somebody trying to meet a length requirement would do. It�s childish, immature, and shows that you have less value in what you write. Therefore, the next time a teacher tells you your paragraphs aren�t long enough; ask them to define what a paragraph is. And then tell them your paragraph meets their definition and that your entire paper, the amount they wanted total, fits their requirement. And artificially inflating a paragraph just because of a misinformed notion would only make the paper worse.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:14 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#2 It Don�t Mean s**t.
Jeff A. Van Booven


Why are we here? This is a question that has been debated throughout the centuries by philosophers and learned men. You�d think, that given the insanely long amount of time they had to figure it out, they would have gotten a clue. But when you consider that their most convincing argument of existence is �I think therefore I am,� it doesn�t leave a lot to be expected from them. After all, many people think, but it doesn�t do them a whole lot of good.

Another fun topic is our purpose in life. Whether or not we have one, but it�s apparently something people will pay for. Countless, books, movies, and other such T.V. shows �like the sob stories you see on Oprah- have been sold for this very purpose. If you�re one of the people lucky enough to know a massive amount of idiots, you can live a pretty wealthy life. Plus, if you�re missing a leg, all the better. Mass Media loves a sob story.

Through all this debate and discussion, the human race has achieved virtually little success in defining ourselves in the abstract. We�re left with little to show and nothing to go on. As far as the abstract goes, to quote a not-so-great NASCAR driver, �It don�t mean s**t.�

It doesn�t leave us with much, just what we want out of life. But lets be honest about it, even then, most of what we want is pointless. Legacies aren�t going to be meaningful to you after you�re dead. Money isn�t going to do you any good six feet under. Don�t get me wrong, if you can get some green, good, but you shouldn�t waste your life away if you can�t. There�s one thing that�s worth more than either of them, and that�s happiness. In your lifetime, happiness is what�s going to matter. If you led a happy life, then you lead a good life.

Too many people, especially in today�s society, are focused solely on the negatives of the culture by zeroing in on things they don�t like. Extremist-Vegans and Eco-terrorists, especially groups like PETA, are good examples of this. They can�t be happy because they can�t agree with the rights of others. Thus, they have to terrorize others and make the world even more unhappy. Then you have the job market; people work their lives away just to buy junk they don�t really need. It isn�t a fluke that you find many more happy people in unindustrialized nations. They don�t have to deal with the constant grind of our high-paced, rush society that places so much emphasis on material goods.

Do yourself a favor. When you go out in the world, do what makes you happy, not what makes you rich. Or, just make a sandwich.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:16 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#3 It This Land is OUR Land
Jeff A. Van Booven


This land is our land. That�s right, �our� land. I�ll say it again least you forget that the key word is �our.� So don�t forget, it�s our land. Now that we�ve established this is our land and not just your land lets continue on with the actual point of why I�ve repeated this sentence five times.

There are more people than just you. They don�t all agree with you and they don�t like everything that you do. They don�t act, think, or talk like you either. Though, just like you, they have rights. Rights, which shouldn�t be denied to them simply because you have a problem with them. Such rights as abortions, guns, gas powered cars, large houses, fur coats, hamburgers, electricity, video games, pornography, drinking, gambling, and the right to give themselves cancer are prime examples of rights that shouldn�t be denied.

Just because this country �or any other country for that matter- is a democracy, does not mean that the majority has the right to oppress the minority. This is something that is very hard-pressed to be understood in today�s society. Censorship is everywhere, anti-everything advocates can be found on nearly every street corner, and you can thank the nice Sierra Club for being so helpful in making gas so expensive.

Gas prices are a prime example of what happens when a group of people neglect the fact that they don�t have the right to deny rights to others. Simply because of protests, distortion, and other such activism by environmentalist groups oil refineries can�t be built in the United States. Which, if you don�t understand what an oil refinery does, this may not make much sense. But, those refineries are the key to turning oil into gas for your car, and without more of them, it won�t matter how much oil is taken out of the ground.

To put it bluntly, you do not have the right to deny others an activity that does not direct or indirectly cause harm to you or others through proper use of the product. This being said, many of the things mentioned above don�t have any effect on people. Abortions have absolutely no effect on anybody outside of the medical staff, patient, and those in link with that patient. That number is surprisingly smaller than the amount of people who go marching on Washington every year.

These people simply believe that because their religion says something is wrong that they have the right to deny it to everybody. As much as they would claim to be tolerant, this blatant ignorance of the people�s rights is surprising. Sure, there is the first amendment, but they are wasting their time. The first amendment does not give you the right to deny rights to others. Abortions do not pose any effect on the church, ergo, the church should respect the right of other Americans to have abortions.

This doesn�t go to say that our more liberal friends are without blame either. I�ve already mentioned problems environmentalists have caused. This doesn�t excuse conservatives either.

Now I�m not against gay marriage �another right which the Christian theocracarists have been apt to deny. But honestly, I want to know how homosexuals getting married destroys the sanctity of marriage? I�ve never understood what the sanctity of marriage actually is. However, in light of fifty percent of marriages ending in divorce I�m pretty sure the sanctity has already been destroyed.

I still don�t enjoy being around gay people. I don�t like to see them kiss. It�s the same with ugly people. It is just my preference not to be around them. I have no ill will towards them. I tolerate them. However, I would prefer that more people could take an interest in making themselves look decent when they go out in public or that they would have heterosexual relationships. I don�t demand they have to. Unfortunately, our liberal brethren have a tendency to overreact any time somebody objects based on preference. Like in this case, being around gays, or seeing pictures directly affects me. Thus, I have the right to object to being exposed to that. It doesn�t make me anti-gay. It just makes me a person who doesn�t like to see these displays of affection, even heterosexual, when I am in a public setting.

Many cities these days are considering, if they haven�t already, instating smoking bans. This bans smoking in all public places. Now last time I checked, private businesses were supposed to be allowed to make these decisions themselves. Why should the government tell a bar that they can�t have smoking simply because it�s harmful to people and that the majority of people don�t like it. Well guess what? The majority of people don�t have to patronize locations that allow smoking. We don�t need big brother government to clean up places. Businesses have a right to allow smoking; you have the right not to visit that location. You don�t have to visit smoky environments, thus you are safe from the smoke.

Now, I�ve given many examples of situations where you don�t have the right to complain or to demand that the government step in; but you need to understand why I make it such a big deal. These sorts of things bring massive groups of people into conflicts each day. Especially in the political arena. Entire elections can be won or lost on social issues that shouldn�t be issues at all. And part of the problem is that if the majority doesn�t realize that they are trying to infringe on other�s rights, then the majority effectively becomes a dictatorship. Even right now, such groups can be seen, The Christian Coalition, Liberals, the Sierra Club, PETA, etc� You can see, many of these groups are a threat to America and its way of life. So, you need to realize that you have to make your own decisions, not what these groups pay millions of dollars to politicians to achieve. These groups don�t elect politicians, the people do.

The next time you decide to take a stand step aside and think for a moment, �How does this actually affect me? How does this affect the general public? Do I have the right to deny others their rights? Is it really a problem, or is it just against my morals and ethics?� Once you are done with these questions, there is a good chance that you�ll have discovered that you really shouldn�t have a problem and that your stand would only negatively impact those who actually enjoy what they are doing already. So be smart, respect others and save us all some grief.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:19 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#4 You�re Idea�s Great. Now Shut Up.
Jeff A. Van Booven

Anybody who frequents writers� forums, especially those with a large population of younger writers, will have noticed this phenomena. It seems that the younger ones have an exceedingly increasing need to have their ideas approved by others. Rarely do these ideas yield such approval either.

The biggest problem faced by wanting such approval is that, most of the time, the ideas put out by younger writers are clich�. Older, more experienced writers are quick to point this out as well. In this way, many of these younger writers end up discouraged from writing their stories. This leads to another problem. The younger writers aren�t practicing their writing.

This lack of practice makes the critiques they receive even harsher. More errors are pointed out, and all around there is less to compliment. Seeing that their stories aren�t very good turns off even more of the younger writers because they feel that they should be good right off the bat. Which, is rarely ever the case.

One of the greatest mistake a young writer can make is to assume that those talented authors started out that way. As I said earlier, older and �more experienced� writers. Experience counts for a lot. You learn to be a better writer by writing. If you consistently seek approval of your ideas before you write them then you miss out on very important practice.

In the early going, it does not matter if an idea is original or clich�. A new author usually lacks the talent an experience to make any idea well written. Stop worrying about whether your idea is good or not. Don�t even bother typing up the idea and asking others to critique it. You aren�t going to like the results. Your self-esteem will not get a boost.

Self-esteem is a hindrance to early writers. They don�t know how to deal with having it hurt. In fact, you�ll hardly ever notice the future authors until they put out a decent piece of work. Those who truly want to work to become authors don�t spend their time asking others to critique their ideas. They go out, write them, and ask people for advice on how they can improve. When they get that advice, they act upon it. They don�t let self-esteem get in the way.

For all you younger writers who want to become a good writer. You�re idea�s great. Now shut up and write it. Quality ideas do not mean quality stories unless you can produce quality writing.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:22 am


Point! What’s Your Point?
#5 Responsibility, a New Low Price of Free.
Jeff A. Van Booven

Ok quick, you’re three hundred pounds overweight, who do you sue? You got drunk and ran your car off a bridge? You were going too fast, turned the corner too sharp and rolled over your SUV? You accidentally killed your best friend while playing with a gun? You went and murdered your next door neighbor because you did it in a video game? If you answered anything but “yourself�? to any of these questions, you need to stop and take a long hard look at your values and morals.

Some of you may not believe me, but who ate the food to make themselves three hundred pounds overweight? Who drank the alcohol to get drunk? Who was pressing on the accelerated and cranked the steering wheel too hard? Who fired the gun? Who decided to murder their next-door neighbor? It certainly wasn’t some corporation. It was one person, you. Now you may not have done any of these things here, but you most likely have shifted responsibility for your actions to somebody else somewhere in your life. We all do it. It’s naturally, but to take it to the extremes to sue somebody else for it, then it becomes almost criminal.

And now the burden of guilt has to rest on the consumers. Companies have to pay lawyers, even when cases are thrown out of court. Are the companies going to take a hit to their profits over this? Certainly not, they’re going to pass it on to their consumers. Want to know why health insurance is through the roof? Try asking your doctor how much his liability insurance is a month. I’m sure he’ll be glad to tell you that he has to take your arm and leg to cover it. People today can not accept that things are their fault, that others can’t fix every problem.

Which is why here today I’m offering my brand new device I call responsibility. With this revolutionary concept, you can take the blame for the things that you have done, knowing that you were wrong to do them. What joys you will discover in finally accepting that you are not perfect and that your actions do indeed have consequences. And if you call now, we’re offering this great, revolutionary product for the new low price of free. So call now, operators are standing by.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:29 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#6 911 for Peace.
Jeff A. Van Booven

Some of you may recognize this columns title from a particular song that is sung by Anti-Flag. For most of you that actually know me, this would come as no surprise that I actually listen to them. What should come as a greater surprise to you is just how relevant this song is to you, even if you think it doesn't.

At the time I'm writing this it happens to be the day after London was bombed. Seeing as this column will be coming to you most likely over a month from the time I'm writing this you may find some discrepancies and all. Though in reality, that bombing isn't all that relative to this column, it's more of a catalyst to the point.

Already within hours after the attacks there was already a call to strengthen our resolve to fight these 'evil' terrorist. But are we really fighting them, or just dropping bombs. Currently our resolve to fight terrorism consists of the line, �I will achieve world peace; even if I have to kill every last one of you.�

For terrorists are not terrorists because they have bombs and can kill us. They are terrorist because they have an ideology that says we are 'evil' people that need to be eliminated. And, what a good way to prove their point than carpet bombing them. We're trading bombs for bombs and it's not going to get either side anywhere. It only feeds the fire. It only proves the other side is 'evil.' It only continues the killing, the murder, the slaughter of innocent lives.

It's not until we fight the true war. Not until we fight the hatred. The ideals. The reasons why they want us dead that any side will win. It isn't about who can kill who. It's about who can bring the people to their side. And bombs are certainly no answer to this problem. You can't win by killing the members, you win by killing the cause. �La Resistance� from the South Park movie states it quite plainly. �Even though you die, La Resistance lives on.�

So turn off your T.V. Stop listening to the politicians and their screams. We don't need their violence, we don't need their answers. Lets extend the olive branch. Let our generation tell the truth and make us the great nation we truly are. Let us not drop bombs, but words instead. Let us treat the world as humans rather than enemies and evil. Let us bring peace through words not wars.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:34 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#7 Aphorisms for the Lazy
Jeff A. Van Booven

It has come to my attention at this point that my rather large buffer for articles has slowly diminished. This is more of a fix to that problem so that I can be lazy for yet another entire month without actually having to do any sort of work. So instead of writing a decent article I''''ve decided to shower you with home-grown aphorisms.

1. When angering bees it is best to be fully clothed, else one is often stung.

2. In situations where things are on fire, it is best not to douse one''''s self in gasoline.

3. When one is assaulted with a knife it is best to produce a gun and shoot the assailant.

4. Always wear gloves when plotting criminal action.

5. When being shot at it is advantageous to not get hit.

6. If pie is left unattended, steal it.

7. Always use spell-check when writing stick-up notes.

8. When robbing a bank, don''''t smile for the camera.

9. When asking a/s/l, always remember that fourteen, female, and my dad''''s a cop is a hint.

10. Bombing raids are and advantageous time for looting and pillaging.

11. When running for office, always remember, dying is a sure fire way to get elected.

12. Never insult a clergyman in a boxing ring.

13. It is better to stab somebody in the stomach; they''''re expecting it from the back.

14. If at first you don''t succeed, increase violence and try again.

15. Peace is achievable if you kill everybody.

16. God hates kittens; this means that killing kittens is a sure ticket to heaven.

17. Mace is great for blinding a chainsaw murderer, but he''ll still drop the chainsaw on you.

18. Always remember the poor starving kids in Africa, you''ll always be superior.

19. When in Rome, it is advantages to take pictures to prove you discovered time travel.

20. If attacked by aliens or robots, call Will Smith not Keanu Reaves.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:39 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#8 Trick or Treat, N00b.
Jeff A. Van Booven

In just a few days many members of our esteemed younger generations will dress up in costumes and go door to door in order to extort you out of your hard earned candy. Other members of a slightly older generation will be out to render damages to your property. And even older members of what we will call generation whipper-snapper will go to somebody else's house and get drunk, therefore they are not really important to this article and, as such, can generally be ignored (accepting of course that you don't have a teenage daughter in this age group, but that's your problem not mine).

However, with this lovely article I will introduce you to some simple steps that you can take to protect yourself this Halloween using products you can pick up from your local hardware store, military base, or any other place where high explosives are sold. While some of these methods may be considered illegal in some, if not all states, they are all a matter of self-defense. Lets face it, these whipper-snappers don't want to pay for your social security, and they need to be learned their place.

First on our list of things to consider is prevention. What better way to protect yourself from their onslaught than making them not wanting to screw with you in the first place. And what better way to scare them the hell off than by littering your lawn with decapitated woodland creatures? It also makes a good use for all those rabbits, squirrels, and other vermin that have been trying to destroy your garden.

Next, because we know that woodland creatures won't be enough, dig yourself up some half decayed human corpses. Accept no substitute for the real thing. Plus, if you want to get real creative, they can double as zombies, but then somebody might wisen up and shotgun them, which would make an awful mess.

Also, if you live in a real bad neighborhood you may want to defecate all over your lawn. It may stink and take a while to finish, but when you think about it, it will be suffering well spent. After all, it isn't the effect that matters, it's the besting of the whipper-snappers that is more important. Winning isn't everything, but total annihilation of the competition is.

Now, on the off chance, people may yet not be deterred by your efforts. This is why we move on to the next step, loss prevention. However, to begin with, you need to add a sign to your yard. �All trespassers will be shot, maimed, shot again, burned, shot, and mutilated. And shot.�

There is, however, one universally accepted way to take care of people walking on your land. We commonly refer to it as land mines, but to be more specific, anti-personnel mines. Now, there is two ways you can go about this. You can use smaller mines like the Chinese type 72 or the American M-14, which will subsequently only do minor damage to the target whipper-snapper's lower extremities. This course of action can only mean one thing, which is that you are a wimp who wants to get your candy stolen. I personally suggest you go with a much more lethal device, the fragmentation mine. Designed to maim, incapacitate, or kill you just can't go wrong with one of these babies.

We can't depend solely upon the stupidity of generation whipper-snapper alone to kill them, plus it is hard to lay mines in concrete. This is where my next suggest comes in. This is where I suggest a howitzer. What better way to stop unwanted trick or treaters than by nailing them with shells from thirty-thousand meters away? If that doesn't stop them, then why not get yourself the Canadian 1st Infantry Division. It isn't like they're doing much of anything anyways.

Some of you may want to take things a bit more into your own hands. There is always the classic but clich� chainsaw, which is always fun. Also, if you want to get a bit creative you can fashion your own festive punji sticks that can be used to liven up your Halloween decorations. Pumpkins rigged with napalm will also allow you to set any would be extortionist aglow in a very befitting manner.

Should, however, they manage to avoid your defenses and arrive at your door I suggest nothing less than depleted uranium shells fired at point blank range. Follow this up with as many blasts from a shotgun as you deem appropriate; the more the better. If you are not able to stop them, consider pre-placing snipers on surrounding rooftops.

If after all this they still manage to steal your candy there is only one true and feasible option to use: The AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter. Armed with not only a M230 30mm automatic cannon it comes equipped with Hellfire, Aim-92, and Aim-9 missiles. And, if that wasn't enough, it also comes with Hydra 70 rockets. If you can't bring down generation whipper-snapper with this bad boy, then you don't deserve your candy.

These are just a few cheap and simple steps that you can take this Halloween to ensure that your stash of candy will be protected from the dastardly generation whipper-snapper who will stop at nothing to see your reserves depleted. This year don't let candy theft happen to you. Also, for the kids, always stay in well lit areas, only visit houses with their lights on. Have your parents inspect all your candy before you eat any and always stay outside even if you are invited in. Have a fun, happy, and safe Halloween.

Until next time, keep generation whipper-snapper off my lawn.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:43 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#9 Education?
Jeff A. Van Booven

Well, I've upgraded to the brand new and spiffy Open Office version 2.0. I know you can all tell the difference. Well, you can't really, but you know if you could you would have. Though, as of late, I haven't been in a very good mood. The holidays around these parts are just another reminder of how much I hate people. It's nothing short of pretentious and stupid, plus it wasn't Jesus's birthday. Of course, what I hate worse more than anything is November, the month of a million projects.

If anything shows the failings of the educational systems its November. Ever teacher rushes to cram everything in one short month in order to get back on schedule because they have no ability to plan, or they waste it all talking about irrelevant, outdated, or already covered material. What's worse, it's also that period before finals that they feel it's a good time to assign that big project, which is befit of any educational value. Exactly how is a poster going to make you understand history better? What educational benefit comes from drawing a large picture of the Civil War other than wasting time that I could spend studying? Why is a college level course asking us to do eight grade level work, if even that?

Education is no longer about learning, it's about making sure everybody meets artificial standards that we lower in order to make sure everybody meets artificial standards. Sure, people learn in different ways. Well, lets try not forcing these ways on people who don't learn that way. Lets look at options like, leaving the kids who learn by reading alone in class. Or better yet, lets use assessment test! What a great and novel idea separating students based upon abilities would be! Imagine, a class of students who are smart working together with minimal difficulty because they can all move at relatively the same speed. Another class of more average students able to spend more amount of time in order to understand something without the interruption of smarter students who are bored stiff! Imagine just how much money that could be saved if teachers didn't waste money on copying pointless busy work! Oh the possibilities!

Now, I probably could spend a great deal of time bitching about the sheer pointlessness of my classes this year, which most of them are. Except for AP Physics, I'm not getting anything out of these other classes other than an ulcer and college credit, which is about the only reason I'm bothering to take these classes in the first place. And silly me, I thought I'd actually learn something.

However, it isn't really me that I'm complaining for -I'm already to apathetic to learning because of the many years of s**t I've put up with-, but for kindergartens. As many of you may know, because I expect this sort of psychic ability out of each and every one of you, I'm a student mentor for a class of kindergarteners. What I say may just shock you, so if you're one of those educational pundits who believes you're fixing the system by throwing money at it, or holding teachers accountable, you may wish to cover your eyes, ears, and suffocate yourself to death because it would just help everybody.

There are only two words, when used in conjunction that can describe the state of kindergarten today, �******** sad.� It's such a disservice to educating children I want to throw up every time I leave.

Now, aside from say, assessing these kids and separating them based upon ability because at this age they are going to learn more than any other time in their life. So it would only make sense to try to get them as far as we can. Aside from that, what the ******** are we actually teaching these kids? Want to know why the Internet is chock full of retards who can neither spell or formulate a cognitive sentence? Attend a kindergarten class.

While I can understand using some basic sight words, it's already dreadfully obvious to me that this effort is not only harmful, but a complete waste of time in the long run. Neglecting that when I go over these words with them they already know them and so I'm only wasting time by doing so. Well, they do know them, except for �they.� They, for the life of them, can not pronounce �they� correctly. You want to know why they can't pronounce �they.� If you guessed its because in our efforts to make education this wonderful place where nobody fails that we decided to remove teaching them phonics, then you would be correct. It isn't like phonics isn't the basis of the entire English language, or that if we focused on the few, less than 40 different phoenetical sounds (versus over 300,000 sight words) they would be able to pronounce and read almost every word in the English language without minimal difficulty. They would also be able to spell better and write quicker. Simply put, they don't know what sound �ey� makes, and they never will for quite some time, because they still have to go over these sight words. But, after a month of them already having mastered these words, they still haven't been moved on.

Now, for the flip side, Math. Isn't it wonderful to know that its almost the end of the first semester and they haven't made it to addition? Don't you just like the fact that they haven't moved off the numbers system? Can you believe that all they work on is counting? Can you believe that these kids have no earthly concept of the base ten system that we use? Care to gather why they're so bad at ordering numbers? Wonder why they have problems with anything past ten? I tried explaining it to them, since it would be beneficial for them to understand and would have made it much easier for them to do the task at hand, but was int erupted by the teacher because that wasn't in the curriculum. So, I guess the educational system thinks that it would just be easier to cheat a little and ignore the very basics. Do yourself a favor, don't send your kids to kindergarten unless you absolutely can't home school them. I guarantee that they'll be much better off for it. They might actually make it to reading, writing, and arithmetic in the first semester.

Just remember, most great minds, Einstein, Newton, Faraday, taught themselves. Give your children a chance, home school them.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:48 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#10 An Open Letter to Congress
Jeff A. Van Booven

Dear Congress,

I quit. You guy are absolutely the most inadequate and inept legislature I have ever seen or heard about in the history of mankind, and lets not forget you're competing against Europe here. I'm really wondering though, is whether or not we should say �Merry Christmas� or �Happy Holidays� really the most important thing that we need to worry about? Frankly, I thought you guys were actually supposed to be doing some sort of job. If I needed people to debate the merits of a seasonal greeting I could talk to high school students, it'd be about the same level of intelligence that Congress has displayed so far.

By the way, I head a lot of mention about social security a few years back. I was just wondering, what ever became of that? I know a lot of ideas were thrown about, but I haven't seen or heard about any of those going through. Are you guys working on it, or did you expend too much effort prosecuting baseball to buy votes and now you're too worn to a frazzle to work on it? An answer to this question would be nice, because I can't certainly fathom that interfering with the judicial system in the Schivo case took all that much effort on your part. I mean, how hard can ignoring the Constitution be?

Oh, and then there was that issue of redoing the tax code. Now I know that the terrorist and you guys have read too many Clancy novels and all, but please, I'm already sick of paper work... Could you please get this taken care of before I have to start filling out these forms. I'd really appreciate that. And lets be honest, it couldn't hurt in the polls. Sure, H & R Block might be upset, but it'll prevent outsourcing in the long run. And it'll save the common people money. That can't be bad, can it?

Speaking of outsourcing, could we please stop blaming this on corporations? Please, it isn't their fault that our entire populas is incompetent. Lets face it, in many ways, India is doing a damn better job than we are, especially in education. Also, they actually want these sorts of jobs, because they mean something over there. Here, these jobs should be done by high school students, not by people trying to make a living. What the hell part of part time job at Wal-Mart makes people think they should be making a living? Honestly, cashiering is not an option. In this global world you need an education to get ahead. Now guess where you guys fit in, aside from your part in trying to play off your responsibilities in regards to outsourcing?

Yes my friends, let no tax dollar go unwasted, that great federal program designed to ruin education once and for all. I have to hand it to you guys, you couldn't have done a better job at destroying what little hope this nation had left. Yep, another trillion ought to make up for not teaching phonics, real math, or thinking logical for that matter. You'd much prefer that we be creative and make up bullshit. That's great, but a doctorate in bullshitology isn't going to make us better prepared to deal with every former soviet bloc nation that is kicking our a** at everything except sports, except of course, that they've already taken to beating the dream team. So there's one for you, those former communist nations that we all so despised are now doing a better job at educating their youth than we are.

You want to know why all our tech jobs are headed to Asia? They have the educated populas to handle the projects. We barely have enough engineers and scientist over here in the U.S. to handle the amount of work that corporations are asking to be done. The fastest growing industry in the United States is engineering, guess what we're not graduating enough of in this country to fill this demand? If you guessed engineers, then you've guessed correctly. Want to know why? Because we're simply failing to educate people properly. We disdain science as some evil tool of corporate America. Furthermore, we then scare people out of the field by saying all the jobs are going overseas. Well, they're going there because we don't have the people here to do them.

Bush wants us to go to Mars, well, tell NASA to have good luck without qualified scientist and engineers to do the research. It's nice to see that you slashed the budget for scientific research as well, that'll go great for helping us stay a world leader. But you know what we're getting too much of? Lawyers; more pricks like you guys who can't run the country to begin with. How about we start emphasizing science and math in school again? How about we start emphasizing something in school, anything at all. Please, have us learn something other than how not to hurt self-esteem. I'm kind of tired of being the world's best bullshitter. I've had twelve years of education in your system, and frankly, I think I could have done it in six years if it wasn't so pointlessly set up. Perhaps you know who I should send the bill for the last six years of my life? After all, the Asians have covered most of the material by middle school.

Anyways, I've gotten off track, this is supposed to be about you guys and your incompetence. Why is our defense budget larger than most of the world's budget combined? Did we truly manage to piss off that many people that we need to outspend the rest of the world just to defend ourselves? I have this radical new approach to the subject, how about we stop playing a*****e number one in the world? I guess we could just let people fight for their own freedom. I just think it would go over much better if we actually waited until the people themselves started the revolution. It might just seem odd, but I just happen to believe it might be better received if they actually wanted our help in the first place. We don't have to be the world police you know. I certainly don't think Korea and Vietnam needed to happen either, but I'm sure that you've all got a good bit of McCarty in all of you. Case in point, that's money we could actually be using for more productive things, like say, reforming the educational system from top to bottom. Perhaps even making college cheaper so that we can send more people through.

Now lets not say I'm finished yet either. I still want answers for your general conduct. What the ******** is up with all your god damn unimportant bullshit! How dare you people act like ******** middle school children who are dealing with their hormones! Nothing says greatest nation on earth like a middle school spat in the capital! It's a wonder that the rest of the world isn't laughing their asses off at this deluded load of bullshit we call a government! Bush is going to be the president, get the ******** over it and do your job! You're the Congress remember, the legislative branch. He's the executive branch. If you didn't notice you have the power to override his veto's. Then, you'd need a veto to override in the first place. I realize that you the democratic party are not in power, but I don't need you to remind me that Bush is an incompetent idiot every time I turn around, he does a good enough job of that himself. However, it would be nice to see you guys doing your job instead of bitching about republicans. The same goes for you republicans as well, stop bitching about the evil liberals and do your ******** job. And as rich as most of you are, why the ******** are we paying you so much god damn money when you barely even do the job in the first place. I bet you, you could go an entire four years without passing a damn bill -leaving the budget as the same from the previous year- and nobody would notice.

In closing, you're incompetent morons. You haven't done s**t to help this country. Do us all favour and never run again. Leave this country to being run by engineers, you know, the people who founded this nation, wrote the constitution, and generally did a good job. Now they may not make much sense, but they do a hell of a job at making things work. Plus, they're doing a heck of a job for China, Japan, and India. This is my two weeks notice.


Go to hell you inefficient basterts and bitches,
Jeff Van Booven.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:49 am


Point! What�s Your Point?
#11 Google, Is It In You?
Jeff A. Van Booven

Introduction
There have been many threads created asking very simple questions, or requesting trivial information, that could have easily been answered by using the amazing and great Google. Even information on the background or other various tid-bits of your writing can be accessed through this wonderful web resource. You can even find literary agents and publishers this way.

Google, your partner in crime.
Lets start out with a very basic example of what you can do with Google.

Lets say that your objective is to look up Hobsbawm's views on Victorian England's Middle Class.

You could just type in England, but that returns 360 million results, and it could take you ages to get the information for your story. Lets start refining your search.

First, the "+" feature. Using the "+" before a keyword will only return you results that have both keywords, such as "England +Victorian" will only give you query returns that have both "England" and "Victorian" in them. This narrows it down under eight million results.

Then, we have the ability to enclose phrases in quotation. Normally, if you just typed the words "Middle" and "Class" into Google it would give you query returns that contained those words, even if they weren't connected. Now, since you want the phrase middle class, enclose it in quotation marks as such: "Middle Class." This will only return pages that contain the phrase "Middle Class." Don't forget to add the plus though. You have: England +Victorian +"Middle Class" and this gives you four hundred thousand returns.

Now, lets pretend that Dickens's has a large amount of sites under this heading and the one we want isn't the second result returned. How would we get rid of all the unwanted Dickens's literature? Simple, we just use the "-" feature. Just type a minus in front of Dickens and all his results are negated. This gives you England +Victorian +"Middle Class" -Dickens

This leaves you with this page, "http://www.victorianweb.org/economics/eh2.html"

Lets review these lovely features.
+ This feature allows you to add words to your returns
- This allows you to remove pages that contain this word
".." Allows you to search for phrases on a web page.

A Little Bit of How it Works.
While you think that Google may just search for key words, its algorithm is much more complex than that. Its search rankings are determined by the number of websites linking to another page. This is how "miserable failure" got to be associated with the Bush website. Many people linked to his site under the name "Miserable Failure."

Credibility
When gathering information on the web, look for credible sources rather than just .com .org, and the like. If you can, find a .edu, these are usually college websites that contain a large amount of accurate and informative information on all subjects ranging from history to correct grammar.

It's Not Just Google.
While Google may seem grand, it wouldn't be a fun Internet without other resources. Google is a dictionary, a book search, video, maps, etc... Click Google's more button to discover what Google can do for you.

But don't discount the rest of the web.
Dictionaries:
Oxford
Dictionary.com
Reverse Dictionary: Find the word to match the definition.

Databases: (Available at libraries, and possibly even from home with your library card. So check today.)
Epnet
Grolier
Sirs

Encyclopedias:
Encyclopedia.com
Britannica
Encarta
Wikipedia


And That May Be All Folks
So remember, if you have a question, Google first, thread later. The Internet is a wonderful, and exhilarating bastion of knowledge just waiting to fill your stories full of credibility and save them from being torn apart for inaccuracies. You can even find true and accurate information about Japanese culture. Google, for a better and smarter tomorrow.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:51 am


User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.Point! What�s Your Point?
#12 Equality!
Jeff A. Van Booven

Equality: the quality or state of being equal

Now I ask you, what part of affirmative action is equal? Isn't that what these African American leaders are trying to achieve? Somehow I think we're missing the point here. Equality is Equality, so why are we still hanging on to such archaic and demeaning systems?

Why do we allow the race card to be played anymore? Honestly, why is race even on an application? If we're trying to be equal, why does sex or race matter? Hell, the only reason you need sex on an application is for something like a college housing. But, for the main acceptance application, sex and race should be completely irrelevant. Since when did we go from accepting the best to accepting somebody based upon their status as a minority?

Frankly, the current system is racist... Against whites! So, to all you middle class white guys, it's about time we joined our brothers and lock arms! It's time to end racism once and for all.

It's been over one hundred years since the slaves were freed. It's been over thirty since the civil rights movements. Great news, if you're oppressed by your economic situation, it's your own ******** fault, not some white guy in the suburbs. It's your fault for dropping out of school. It's your fault for focusing more on basketball than algebra.

If you want to be equal, get off your ******** a** and earn it rather than demanding it be legislated. This current situation of yelling racism anytime you don't get hired for a job, or get arrested for committing a crime is a mockery of all the things the great civil rights leaders, those who fought to end slavery, and every person who has ever tried to end racism have done. Most of the things claimed as racist these days is spitting in the face of Martin Luther King. The NAACP is a ******** joke. How about they institute a program to reduce crime and help urban education? Why is it more important to them to try and keep police from doing their job?

If you ask me, the only person oppressing blacks is groups like the NAACP who benefit from keeping blacks in their current situation. Think about it, where do businesses benefit from oppressing blacks? They don't, the more people with money, the more people who can buy their stuff. The government doesn't benefit, because the less poor people, the more taxes, and the less given out in welfare. So who would benefit from keeping blacks oppressed? The groups who use the oppression of African Americans to promote their agendas. Certainly you would think that the NAACP would be coming out strongly against blacks dropping out of school, blacks joining gangs, and the entire ghetto mentality for the most part... However, they're more focused on claiming that whites are holding blacks back and that the government should legislate more jobs to blacks.

Why should so many jobs be given to blacks based upon the population of the area? It's somewhat of a joke. How can they fill such a quota in construction if there aren't enough blacks qualified in the first place. Then, the nerve to say that private businesses should have to educate the blacks for the jobs so that they can fill a racist quota.

It's about time we as American's cried �bullshit.� It's time to realize that there isn't a problem with race, just a group of people who refuse to do for themselves.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:54 am


User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.Point! What�s Your Point?
#12.5 Excerpt from "The Ten Commandments Need an Asterisk"
Jeff A. Van Booven

I just love this story, I really do. Muslims pissed off about a comic-strip. I just love this, a simple stupid comic strip. It really is grand. It's grown into an international soap opera, the only thing it doesn't have is Spanish. I just love the �death to Denmark� lines. What's even sadder, America is siding with the Muslims, you know, that country that is currently fighting in Iraq to give them 'freedom.' It's nice to see that we only apply freedom of speech and press to countries we are currently trying to subjugate. If you aren't blowing us up, or getting blown up by us, then you really don't matter. Hell, it's kind of sad, America can't even keep its title as 'The Great Satan.� Really, I think we need to work harder as a group to make sure these sort of slip-ups don't happen again.

Really though, this leads me into the main point I'd like to make. Where did they get all these Danish flags from? Did they just delay the protests until they could get the proper number of flags to burn? Honestly though, Lichtenstein could make some patronizing comment about Allah and the next day they'd be burning the flag of Lichtenstein in Iran by lunch. I think it makes a powerful statement about who is really behind all of this terrorism and problems in the middle east.

Who else stands to profit from anything that happens, no matter what the results? Flag makers. 9/11, Americans by large amounts of flags. America invades Iraq, Muslims by large amounts of flags to protest with. Danish publish cartoons to incite the Muslim world, Danish flags go up in smoke. Who profits no matter which side wins out, flag makers. Who are these flag makers as well? They're like Gideons and their bibles, they exist somewhere, that's certain, but you never see them.

Also, I fail to see what the problem is here. Muslims trying to kill the Jews and vice versa. Where is this problem? Haven't Christians for thousands of years engaged in holy wars, purges, and genocides to try and eliminate these two groups from existence? I distinctly remember there being some sort of Crusades in there. Then there was that whole instance of blaming the Jews for the black death. The Spanish Inquisition, and I also think there was that thing called the Holocaust in there as well. Why the sudden shift in policy? It would seem to me that this should be something to propagate. Jews, Muslims, fighting. To me this seems like something that should have Christians dancing in the streets. Frankly, if you can't keep your bigoted policy consistent, then you really have nothing to stand on. Pat Robertson has it right, I just don't get why more people don't listen to him, he's like the authority on good ole Christian standards.

I think it's time we use a new strategy, load the middle east with weapons and let them go at it. Frankly, a good holy war would be good for this planet. The population is getting too big anyways, plus, it's about time China did something. Why should the United States get to have all the fun pissing everybody off? More war, it's time the herd got thinned.

Jahoclave
Crew


Jahoclave
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:55 am


User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.Point! What�s Your Point?
#13 Dear President Bush
Jeff A. Van Booven

Dear President Bush,

I am writing this letter to you because I feel that too many people are being too negative of you. After all, being president seems to be a really thankless job and I know you must be working really hard. People just don't seem to get you, with your lack of grammar, inability to speak properly, choking on simple food products, falling off bicycles, and generally embarrassing our nation in front of the entire world. Frankly I think it is wrong of all these protesters to be so negative of you, after all, you're the president and they certainly don't speak for the American Populace. After all, more people voted for Gore.

Frankly, I couldn't stand the thought of having this country run by any man who didn't talk directly to God on occasion. It must come in really handy to have an all knowing, all powerful, infallible being giving you advice. It's too bad Congress didn't approve him to be your Secretary of State, but I guess Condi is doing a good enough job; God could talk to her as well if need be. You just keep up the good work of making this country unsafe for those Atheist, Pro-Choicers, and Arab bastards to live in. And we must be ever vigilant to make sure that no witch lives within our borders as well; which is why I still have a bone to pick about your lack of anti-witch policies. Certainly you have noticed that this upsurge in civil rights the people are enjoying is leading to way too many pagans and wiccans existing within our borders... We need to stop their advances at all cost before they manage to use their evil liberal influences to purge our Great Lord from this great nation under God. I am appalled that you have yet to repeal the first amendment and declare Christianity the only religion allowed; certainly you must have this planned for the last few years of your great presidency. I am glad to finally have a president who believes in the Divine Right of Presidents.

Oh, and taking all that money away from helping our youth for college, wonderful idea for helping out those Middle-Class Americans attend college. It should certainly protect us from running out of qualified scientists and engineers. And it will definitely keep more kids out of those dastardly liberal arts schools. I say good job on keeping our children safe from the evil communist, socialist, and liberal influences that our collegiate system has become filled with. I applaud your efforts to keep liberalism from our shores. And lets face it, if we were to allow these students to fully develop into qualified scientists and engineers then we would be faced with the problem of being a nation that could compete economically and intellectually with such nations as Japan and China. This would most certainly ruin any chance of us to outsource more jobs overseas. It could even start conflict by making these other nations feel threatened by our increase in intellectual capacity.

That being said, I can not express the joy I get from No Child Left Behind. It is simply the best thing in education since Dewey. It has helped to divert millions of dollars away from funding that could have otherwise been used to support programs for the intellectually gifted students. Missouri spends millions of dollars on MAP tests to prove that they're up to the �standards.� It is almost a guarantee that they would have otherwise spent this money on much needed improvements in schools and could have helped prevent hundreds of tax hikes throughout the state. It would have also led to more and more programs being able to exist for those gifted students who would have eventually become leaders, scientists, and brought great benefits to our society if only they'd been given the chance to excel. Instead they're becoming dropouts, drug addicts, and killing themselves because of the lack of proper education. And those that do put up with it are becoming quickly disenfranchised and are making plans to leave, or otherwise separate themselves from our great nation of God. All is good though, because if we let these with the capacity to excel, then it would be much harder for us to keep the other kids up to their level. Certainly it makes sense that it would be easier to keep the smart stupid than make the stupid smart. I don't see how anybody could rightly miss the logic in that. If we keep the level low then we'll never have to worry about missing it.

Thank You George W. Bush,
Your Devout and Loyal Subject.

P.S. Go for the record, get involved in another war. You only need another to beat Truman.

TML
TML
Reply
Staffies At Work

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
//
//

// //

Have an account? Login Now!

//
//