|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:31 pm
Everyone even slightly political can see how bush's presidency has been dying due to severe cases of: Iraq war, abramoff scandal, failure to enact his public policy agenda, allegations of making fun of the religious right, and loss of congress. Now dealing the final blow is three final scandals in a single week. 1. Libby Scouter has been convicted on fraud and perjury for lying about leaking the identity of a CIA agent, which in the court of public opinion also implicates the VP, the President and his top aide/secret lover Mr. Rove 2. The veteran hospitals have been shown to have deplorable conditions including rats, insufficient medical treatment, and mildew. 3. Allegations that he purposefully fired US attornies for political gain have been made before congress.
His approval ratings were at 30 percent before all this came up... its bound to only fall further. This directly involves the pro-life movement in three ways. 1. The republican party is/will be even further completely destroyed for at least the 2008 election cycle probably longer. 2. The next presidential race starts off strongly favoring democrats. 3. Most republican canidates will likely be moderates who will likely cause a third party run. Basically not only have we now completely destroyed any chance of Roe being overturned or any pro-life legislation being put through, we will also have a federal judiciary stacked with liberal minded judges who will through out most pro-life state legislation.
Discuss.
For those that don't know some of the issues I mentioned. 1. The abramoff scandal involved republican members of congress and the white house allegedly taking bribes. Already 9 people have been convicted including one republican congressman. 2. A top official in the White House administration, who dealt with the religious sector of the public, has written a book talking of how bush has allegedly made fun of religious people calling them "nuts".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:33 pm
Take it to the ED.
EDIT: wait, nevermind. It just hit me what this was talking about.
Yeah, we're screwed.
I guarantee though that there will be scandals, big ones, just liek in this presedency. There are in EVERY precendecy, and they are actualy to be expected. But I wonder, with how liberaly biased most of the media has shown its self now, will we hear as much abotu those scandals as we have these...if we hear about them at all?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:37 pm
I wonder if those coming into power will try to run gag campaighns against pro-life movements, try to stop the March for Life, and try to make talk against abortion a word against women's rights, and effectivly, hate speech.
Iknow I know. A bit way out there, but there are quite few who would love to see it all happen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:01 pm
are there not democrats for life? the cause transcends the puppet on the throne. we can still fight back.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:46 pm
yes there are democrats for life, but we are a very small section of the party. We are gaining ground, but the vast majority of democratic presidential candidates, as well as democratic leadership(which has strong control of what happens in congress) are pro-choice. Not to say we aren't making ground, but considering the way things are going it might be another full decade before we could seriously consider coming into political strength again.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:18 pm
Sorry, but I see no downside to this whatsoever.
Democrats in power = better sex ed, better health care for everyone, less discrimination against single mothers and pregnant women, better access to birth control, and more support for those who can't afford to raise a child on their own, which all = fewer abortions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:46 pm
Personally, I'm voting for Obama. I donated to his campaign and I'm asking my friends to vote too. I love Obama. He gives me hope for America. Far better than that crazy b***h Hillary Clinton. Frankly even though I believe he's pro-choice he's a religious man willing to give the rest of us equal treatment and I love that. I trust that his great moral sensibility will lead us onward to good things.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:28 pm
 The thing that scares me about Obama is that he voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. I don't remember all the details on the Act, mostly because it's 1:27 am and I'm drugged, but I do remember it made me do a doubletake.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:58 pm
Well Hell, only 10:57 here but I admit I'm wearing out of drunkenness and don't quite trust myself to make a fair call right now. I'll check it out when I'm sober and re-evaluate my position. I love Obama but I'm willing to recall my position based on other views of his.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:48 am
Tiger of the Fire I wonder if those coming into power will try to run gag campaighns against pro-life movements, try to stop the March for Life, and try to make talk against abortion a word against women's rights, and effectivly, hate speech. Iknow I know. A bit way out there, but there are quite few who would love to see it all happen Is "hate speech" illegal? o.O What happened to freedom of speech? I mean, even the freaking KKK is still around in a legal form. La Veuve Zin Sorry, but I see no downside to this whatsoever. Democrats in power = better sex ed, better health care for everyone, less discrimination against single mothers and pregnant women, better access to birth control, and more support for those who can't afford to raise a child on their own, which all = fewer abortions. Uh, I don't think that having Democrats in power will change much of any of that. Certainly not discrimination against single mothers and pregnant women. What are they going to do, pass anti-discrimination laws? We already have those. They aren't helping. They may make health care available to more people, but how are they going to make it of a better quality? And I personally think that they are more likely to make abortions available to those who can't afford to raise a child on their own, rather than subsidizing them. It's cheaper. And I admit that Obama intrigues me as well. But then again, I do not know his position on any of the issues. Only his public image. Which is a bad thing to base a vote on, really.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:16 am
there are laws on speech designed only to hurt, it' s called like, fighting words, or something...that or there's no protection against it if someone gets beat up for saying it. i think that's it.
but yeah, again, our goal is more than a political struggle, it is about saving lives. just like how slavery was much favored- truth still shone through, and justice prevailed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:40 am
Minisota is bad off thanks to liberal politics. I dont want the rest of America like that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:52 pm
divineseraph there are laws on speech designed only to hurt, it' s called like, fighting words, or something...that or there's no protection against it if someone gets beat up for saying it. i think that's it. but yeah, again, our goal is more than a political struggle, it is about saving lives. just like how slavery was much favored- truth still shone through, and justice prevailed. Playing the devils advocate here, but first off, I despise slavery in any form of another human using another human without consent or total reason. Anyway, but the south did have a reason to keep the slaves, I mean it was a highly agricultural economic system and they needed the cheap (no moneh!) labor to grow their crops and work the fields, was it right, no, but I mean they needed to make a living somehow. Off topic. Anyway, I don't even know the candidates... some American I am *thumbs up*.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:13 am
but the point was, in the end, the group of people being screwed over the most always gains ground.
before it was slaves. then, black people in general and women. now, feti. basic human rights are on our side- though they have bodily integrity, we have the most basic of basic freedoms- life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:55 am
divineseraph but the point was, in the end, the group of people being screwed over the most always gains ground. before it was slaves. then, black people in general and women. now, feti. basic human rights are on our side- though they have bodily integrity, we have the most basic of basic freedoms- life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. OOOOH, a trend in history is what you are saying? Sorta goes with the ideal of if we don't learn from our mistakes we will be doomed to repeat them in essence?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|