|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:00 pm
I just made my consultation for top surgery.
Now, the thing I was wondering is...does anyone know if I have any chance of getting it covered by my insurance? My breasts are DD/DDD and hurt my back (as in, I can't lean over at all without my back hurting), and hoping I may be able to get it done for medical reasons...
So, what are you all's opinions? sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:52 am
That's a tough question to answer... I'd talk to your doctor and surgeon about how they can go about coding the procedure, and have them communicate with your insurance company. In general, almost all SRS of any kind will not be covered by insurance at all; however, if your doctor and surgeon could communicate that it's for medical reasons and essential, you may have a chance.
Good luck, though don't keep your hopes up; US insurance companies are s**t, and will find any way to get out of paying for anything that they can. My roommate, who is DDD/E, can't get it covered by her insurance company, and it's not for TS purposes that she'd get a reduction.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:54 am
[Good luck...D; If you can weasel it in as some kind of medical reason, you'll have an easier time if you haven't changed your sex markers yet.]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:22 pm
Do you have anything about GID on your medical records yet? If not, and you want surgery before anything else, do NOT bring it up. From what I've heard, if insurance companies get a sniff of that, you're doomed. It wouldn't hurt to do a little research into the subject of breast reductions and which insurance companies have covered in them in the past.
I was in a similar situation, though I'm in the UK. I could have had a breast reduction on the NHS, though as it happened I had surgery privately because I couldn't stand the waiting time (and may not have had my first choice of surgeon). It seems reasonable to me that if you heavily exaggerate the symptoms your breasts give you - eg, that you can't walk far/do lifting/etc without back pain, and get a doctor or two behind you, you may have a chance.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:07 pm
I'm just wondering..
This is about breast reduction, which is covered by some insurance companies. But wouldn't reduction mean that there would -still- be breast tissue, enough to be noticeable?
And requiring another eventual surgery?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:24 pm
I feel abit like the only one who's had just a reduction so far o.0 answering reduction-related questions...
well like I said in another thread, the reduction only goes 1->2 sizes down usually, beause its a REDUCTION and just supposed to make it so your breasts are in proportion with your body.... which for me was a D [!!!] somehow.... I have no idea if you can talk them into taking it all off and calling it a reduction surgery
In Canada reduction surgery is covered by ohip if its effecting your health [back pain, depression, unable to run or lift things]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:32 pm
Depends on the medical insurance. I guess if they're that big then probably. If you can give your insurance company evidence that they're causing you back problems then they'll probably cover it.
Good luck.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|