|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:19 pm
Ice cream truck music! gonk That's disgusting, but I shouldn't probably talk about it since I barely read much... still... those are just crazy people, giving out her address and phone number? They have no right to do that. I'm glad no one in this guild is like them...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:59 pm
Quote: If he weren't pro-life, he might even be a Democrat. Or a libertarian. Um, hello, you can be a Democrat or libertarian and pro-life. Thousands of people are. So ******** off. Oh, but I liked this: Quote: "There've been a couple of times where Troy has been talking to me and I've thought, 'Could this guy maybe have a point?' " says a Maggot Punk named Steven Pottorff. "He's that convincing." Owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:59 pm
Dude, this story is old, and already has a thread pretty much devoted to it. :/ It's buried somewhere back there, but it's back there.
Yes, it's twisted and underhanded, and a lot of what they did is probably illegal. Also, note that the post was made in 2004: Almost three years ago. It's quite possible that people from that group have been arrested since then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:19 am
They're under investigation from the IRS, but really...
The only thing they're doing that's illegal is trying to persuade other people to break the law.
I don't agree with OR in most things. Their "truth truck" has saved lives, but how many children has it traumatized? It's a truck with massive images of aborted babies. Normally I'd say fetuses, but I'm getting emotional, I can't look at these images without getting upset. I can't post the images here for people because I could get banned if I do.
There are more effective ways to turn the population against abortion, like, 3d ultrasound images. But this? This is counterproductive. It also might lead to more restrictive laws and more government involvement in our lives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:47 am
I'm defiantly all for protesting, I wish more people would do it, but if he's breaking the law in any way, then i don't support him one bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:43 pm
Scribblemouse Here's something more recent then. Not quite in the same league, but still. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/6364401.stm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:46 pm
Lorysa Scribblemouse Here's something more recent then. Not quite in the same league, but still. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/6364401.stm I think it was, again, sick. She knew they would upset people, and sure enough, they did. I can't imagine how it must have been for the woman whose daughter had recently had a stillbirth, seeing those pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:47 pm
that's complete bullshit. So i can get porn emailed to my inbox by these jerks who use spyware to get my personal information, but when someone does the same thing with a pro-life agenda, suddenly that 'free-speech' stuff goes out the window. I'm not saying what she did was good, but just for ONCE I'd like to see the same thing cut both friggin ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:52 pm
MiNdCaNdY that's complete bullshit. So i can get porn emailed to my inbox by these jerks who use spyware to get my personal information, but when someone does the same thing with a pro-life agenda, suddenly that 'free-speech' stuff goes out the window. I'm not saying what she did was good, but just for ONCE I'd like to see the same thing cut both friggin ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:07 pm
yes, but when was the last time you read about someone getting punished for it? It's too much a business now for that, what with all the companies that make a fortune selling spyware blockers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:17 pm
MiNdCaNdY yes, but when was the last time you read about someone getting punished for it? It's too much a business now for that, what with all the companies that make a fortune selling spyware blockers. I believe the pictures were sent by snail-mail, not e-mail, so no blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:56 pm
I would totally throw out people's junk mail for a one-time fee of $49.99.
Mindcandy, I'm snail-mailing you an ad for "male enhancement." whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
