|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:54 pm
I'd just like to add that the trade centre towers are disputable, but the pentagon attack is pretty well certain something is wrong.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:53 pm
omg it's an hour and a half long! i'll let you know if i ever find the time to watch it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:53 pm
ezvondulodt omg it's an hour and a half long! i'll let you know if i ever find the time to watch it.... You really should. It's quite eye-openning, and it isn't boring, it flows very nicely. Even if you won't change your mind, it is still great to watch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:22 am
Spartan05089234 ezvondulodt omg it's an hour and a half long! i'll let you know if i ever find the time to watch it.... You really should. It's quite eye-openning, and it isn't boring, it flows very nicely. Even if you won't change your mind, it is still great to watch i'll try to watch it sometime, but since it's so long, it might take me a while to get around to it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:39 pm
ezvondulodt Spartan05089234 ezvondulodt omg it's an hour and a half long! i'll let you know if i ever find the time to watch it.... You really should. It's quite eye-openning, and it isn't boring, it flows very nicely. Even if you won't change your mind, it is still great to watch i'll try to watch it sometime, but since it's so long, it might take me a while to get around to it... the sooner the better. its really crazy. Some of the stuff they show is like "hey wait, how did we not hear about this before?" It makes Michael Moore's movie look useless
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:46 pm
confirm nor deny, LOL. It was interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:22 pm
air_kid577 confirm nor deny, LOL. It was interesting Well it didn't want to take a side (even though it was all pointing the same way) and thats better. It means you feel like your watching a real debate, not one group telling you why you're wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:16 pm
conspiracy theory, things cant always be just as they seem, im glad to see people are out looking and investigating into the subject to make sure that there are or arent alterior motives but on the issue of 9/11 i fail to see that it was anything other than an islamic terrorist attack, no matter the amount of circumstantial evidence one piles on the subject, my opinion at least
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:09 pm
Sean_Of_Sparta conspiracy theory, things cant always be just as they seem, im glad to see people are out looking and investigating into the subject to make sure that there are or arent alterior motives but on the issue of 9/11 i fail to see that it was anything other than an islamic terrorist attack, no matter the amount of circumstantial evidence one piles on the subject, my opinion at least Alright, even if it was a terrorist attack, ask yourself this: 1. There was a lot of stock trading involving the trade centres (I don't understand that stuff, but people were positioning themselves to lose the least amount of money) right before the attacks 2. Why were bomb-sniffing dogs removed after a period of hightenned security the day before 9/11? 3. (the big one) I'm pretty sure bombs were used in the foundations to help bring down the trade centres, and this could well have been Al-Qaida's work. If so, why was it not made public? It would only strengthen the US's case that the terrorists could infiltrate these buildings and sabotage them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:22 am
Alright, even if it was a terrorist attack, ask yourself this:
1. Im no genius at stocks either but buying and selling happens all the time and it only makes since that in one of the largest stock trading centres of the world that such actions would occur, it could be something as simple as microsoft going to court again or Cokes failure with Co2.
2. No idea why the dogs were removed, it had been 8 years since the last bombing of the WTC and threats against such a place were and are numerous, Im sure it was seen as no big deal and done several times before, it could quite possibly be human error at worst. Imagine for 8 years looking for a bomb threat every day? Not likely considering inner aegis was more than formidable, a sad thing to entertain but quite possible.
3. This was like the attempt on WTC in 1998, The foundation is consequently the weakest/strongest part of the building and would require a significant amount of time and explosives to complete the task, if your going to have a building destroyed (no matter who does it) why would you still fly planes into the building? I suppose the government wouldnt make that public because it didnt happen, because I agree that it would be better for security of high priority buildings like the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole and the marine barracks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:00 pm
I guess I'm still too closed-minded to go along with SOME of what you're saying. But for the record, the dogs were only there for like a month before, and the stock trading was not necessarily inside those buildings, but rather was people making bets that Boeing (did I spell that right?) and American Airlines stocks were going to fall (they are called "put options". The day before 9/11, 16x the average amount of put options were placed on Boeing stock, and 10x the daily average on American airlines.
The fact here is not who is responsible, it is simply that a lot of people knew, and did nothing, regardless of what actually happenned
ps: I am Spartan's mule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
