|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:59 pm
((i know my spelling is horrable))
But do you think he's the best so far?..yes / no? and if yes or no, why?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:03 pm
You know, it all depends on what promotion it's held in. But in ROH, I think Danielson wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Abstraction Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:09 pm
Floating Abstraction You know, it all depends on what promotion it's held in. But in ROH, I think Danielson wins. Well i know but more or less in a regular match.....and i thought ROH didn't make people win...i thought they just play out the story line for whoever were to win the match
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:10 pm
Again, best in what? Also a note-Why do people ask who would win in a match? It differs, who is booking? I mean, Cena could beat Danielson, saying WWE booked it. Winning has noting to do with talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Abstraction Captain
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:12 pm
dusklord Floating Abstraction You know, it all depends on what promotion it's held in. But in ROH, I think Danielson wins. Well i know but more or less in a regular match.....and i thought ROH didn't make people win...i thought they just play out the story line for whoever were to win the match I don't see Benoit or Angle defeating Danielson...they're both older guys and if Danielson punishes them enough, they'll lose. I mean, if KENTA couldn't beat Danielson for the title, how are those other guys going to? With that being said, I'd love to see Danielson vs. The Briscoes in a three way match for the title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:12 pm
Max Fischer-Valuck Again, best in what? Also a note-Why do people ask who would win in a match? It differs, who is booking? I mean, Cena could beat Danielson, saying WWE booked it. Winning has noting to do with talent. i mean best in over all wrestling abillity....and i mean in a regular match without any premotion...i'm talking about his skill not about the premotion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:13 pm
Floating Abstraction dusklord Floating Abstraction You know, it all depends on what promotion it's held in. But in ROH, I think Danielson wins. Well i know but more or less in a regular match.....and i thought ROH didn't make people win...i thought they just play out the story line for whoever were to win the match I don't see Benoit or Angle defeating Danielson...they're both older guys and if Danielson punishes them enough, they'll lose. I mean, if KENTA couldn't beat Danielson for the title, how are those other guys going to? With that being said, I'd love to see Danielson vs. The Briscoes in a three way match for the title. that would be nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:17 pm
dusklord Max Fischer-Valuck Again, best in what? Also a note-Why do people ask who would win in a match? It differs, who is booking? I mean, Cena could beat Danielson, saying WWE booked it. Winning has noting to do with talent. i mean best in over all wrestling abillity....and i mean in a regular match without any premotion...i'm talking about his skill not about the premotion Skill matters not in a match. In a shoot fight, Big Show would beat Danielson, and I think Danielson is alot better then Big Show. Talent at wrestling as we know it does not matter for two shits in a fight without booking, since you will not being hitting a suplex, no matter how perfect. Out of your choice, Angle would win since he is, you know, Angle. In a match, the winner will be who ever is booked to win, no matter the promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:19 pm
Danielson vs Shawn Michaels
Protege vs Teacher/Mentor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:19 pm
Max Fischer-Valuck dusklord Max Fischer-Valuck Again, best in what? Also a note-Why do people ask who would win in a match? It differs, who is booking? I mean, Cena could beat Danielson, saying WWE booked it. Winning has noting to do with talent. i mean best in over all wrestling abillity....and i mean in a regular match without any premotion...i'm talking about his skill not about the premotion Skill matters not in a match. In a shoot fight, Big Show would beat Danielson, and I think Danielson is alot better then Big Show. Talent at wrestling as we know it does not matter for two shits in a fight without booking, since you will not being hitting a suplex, no matter how perfect. Out of your choice, Angle would win since he is, you know, Angle. In a match, the winner will be who ever is booked to win, no matter the promotion. egh' i think it's alittle messed up that it has to be that way but yeah...i guess i could agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:20 pm
RandyKeithOrton Danielson vs Shawn Michaels Protege vs Teacher/Mentor hell...i didn't even know that lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:24 pm
I actually never cared for American Dragon. He's not bad wrestler it's just a majority of his matches bore me. I for one am looking forward to the day he loses the ROH Title...I was giddy after he lost the FIP strap. Quote: .....and i thought ROH didn't make people win...i thought they just play out the story line for whoever were to win the match ROH like almost every other Pro Wrestling Orgainization is a work. The matches are predetermined and the booking team picks the champions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Abstraction Captain
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:25 pm
dusklord RandyKeithOrton Danielson vs Shawn Michaels Protege vs Teacher/Mentor hell...i didn't even know that lol William Regal trained Danielson also...... Have you ever noticed how Bryan wears those red boots? Look familiar, don't they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:26 pm
dusklord Max Fischer-Valuck dusklord Max Fischer-Valuck Again, best in what? Also a note-Why do people ask who would win in a match? It differs, who is booking? I mean, Cena could beat Danielson, saying WWE booked it. Winning has noting to do with talent. i mean best in over all wrestling abillity....and i mean in a regular match without any premotion...i'm talking about his skill not about the premotion Skill matters not in a match. In a shoot fight, Big Show would beat Danielson, and I think Danielson is alot better then Big Show. Talent at wrestling as we know it does not matter for two shits in a fight without booking, since you will not being hitting a suplex, no matter how perfect. Out of your choice, Angle would win since he is, you know, Angle. In a match, the winner will be who ever is booked to win, no matter the promotion. egh' i think it's alittle messed up that it has to be that way but yeah...i guess i could agree Meh, it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:26 pm
personally i prefer christopher daniels...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
