|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:12 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:23 am
._. you might not want to link directly from another image with out first copying it and loading it in photobucket or image shack any more.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:51 am
did you really hotlink or is someone just trying to mess with you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:58 am
I've seen the pic with the drawings of two blokes in people's sigs before - It's a stupid comparison.
Was it really necessary to post the porn picture though!? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:13 am
I edited the picture so it's not taking anyone's bandwidth.
For future reference, please save pictures to your own account before posting them, unless you have permission to hotlink them from someone else's account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:13 am
We're performing hysterectomies now? I don't want your uterus, lady, I have one too many already. In fact, here, I surrender mine. Stick an apple in it and roast it at a luau for all I care.
Yeah. Fail. rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:22 pm
La Veuve Zin We're performing hysterectomies now? I don't want your uterus, lady, I have one too many already. In fact, here, I surrender mine. Stick an apple in it and roast it at a luau for all I care. Yeah. Fail. rolleyes Apparently so. Also we hold them hostage until they give birth. Seriously though, since when any pro-lifer forced a woman to give birth? I never heard about any doing that. And how can someone surrender their uterus? They make the woman give her uterus to them? I like the other version better cause it's more true. A woman that decided not to be a mother is called pro-choice and people support her and even congradulate her, but when a guy don't want to be a father they think he is evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:40 pm
 See, this pisses me off.
Abortion =/= equality. This isn't real feminism, this isn't a banner of hope, or of compassion. This should shame pro-choicers: denying someone a right to believe something simply because of their sexual orientation.
S'it. I'm blocking the person who made that damn banner. 'Cause she's not against bullshit, contrary to whatever her signature says. Unlike her, I don't need the right to kill my children to live a long and prosperous life. I don't need sex to live. I don't need to hate every single person whose views differ from mine.
I don't need to be prejudice against tiny life forms, and bigger life forms that stand up for the little life forms, to look cool or blend in. I'm better than that.
So, no. "Choicers Against Bullshit"? Okay, dear. Just keep telling yourself that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:19 pm
But the truly hilarious thing was the little comment at the bottom. Choicers against bullshit. By making such outrageous idiotic bullshit claims?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:24 am
King Seth But the truly hilarious thing was the little comment at the bottom. Choicers against bullshit. By making such outrageous idiotic bullshit claims? Yeah, that's just.....no. rolleyes The only bullshit I see is ridiculous, baseless accusations. Who makes these? Are we allowed to say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:49 am
bullshit = false generalisations and unfounded acusations with messages that do not make logical sence. We're both victims of it.
Another example woul be the homosexual one. Takign away a womans rights so we can have more of our own? A poor atempt at being fecioutiously funny with a message that makes absolutly no sence and is completly unfounded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:35 pm
Tiger of the Fire bullshit = false generalisations and unfounded acusations with messages that do not make logical sence. We're both victims of it. Another example woul be the homosexual one. Takign away a womans rights so we can have more of our own? A poor atempt at being fecioutiously funny with a message that makes absolutly no sence and is completly unfounded. What? Since when homosexuals trying to take rights aways? They sure like to insult everyone and make stuff up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:14 pm
sachiko_sohma Tiger of the Fire bullshit = false generalisations and unfounded acusations with messages that do not make logical sence. We're both victims of it. Another example woul be the homosexual one. Takign away a womans rights so we can have more of our own? A poor atempt at being fecioutiously funny with a message that makes absolutly no sence and is completly unfounded. What? Since when homosexuals trying to take rights aways? They sure like to insult everyone and make stuff up. Huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:07 pm
oh yeah, everyone knows how homosexuals want to opress women in order to...
actually, that one's just so rediculous as it is, i can't even think of a way to properly mock it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:22 pm
FreeArsenal sachiko_sohma Tiger of the Fire bullshit = false generalisations and unfounded acusations with messages that do not make logical sence. We're both victims of it. Another example woul be the homosexual one. Takign away a womans rights so we can have more of our own? A poor atempt at being fecioutiously funny with a message that makes absolutly no sence and is completly unfounded. What? Since when homosexuals trying to take rights aways? They sure like to insult everyone and make stuff up. Huh? The "they" was directed at the person who made it, not homosexuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
