|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:44 pm
I've heard a lot of talk about people refusing to label themselves punks, and various reasons why and why not, but I think the issue comes down to one thing; your definition of what a punk is. So, what's everybody's definition?
Some food for thought: "A guy walks up to me and asks 'What's Punk?'. So I kick over a garbage can and say 'That's punk!'. So he kicks over the garbage can and says 'That's Punk?', and I say 'No that's trendy!'" Billie Joe Armstrong
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:14 pm
newatreides I've heard a lot of talk about people refusing to label themselves punks, and various reasons why and why not, but I think the issue comes down to one thing; your definition of what a punk is. So, what's everybody's definition? Some food for thought: "A guy walks up to me and asks 'What's Punk?'. So I kick over a garbage can and say 'That's punk!'. So he kicks over the garbage can and says 'That's Punk?', and I say 'No that's trendy!'" Billie Joe Armstrong i hope you dont actually believe the billie joe thing, punk is far different from an a*****e which im sure you know. ive already said my definition, someone could be considered a "punk" if they believe in freedom and equality, like the music, and have political views based on all 3 of those things. personally, i think labels are divisive. i refuse to call myself a punk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:42 pm
If you call yourself punk you're automatically not punk! It's the law.
I know I am supposed to discuss what punk means but this is my guild and I'll post what I want in it. So rather than talking about what punk means I am going to talk about my thoughts on labeling.
ahem- Many thirteen year old Wiccan bisexuals who shop at hot topic will tell you that labels are for soup cans. While I do enjoy being able to tell the difference from a delicious can of tomato soup from a cold and soggy soup of cream of chicken I believe that labels can be used for oh so much more! Imagine for a moment that you live in a trailer and that your mother is too poor to afford condoms ( you do live in a trailer). Needless to say she has 12 kids running around the place. You‘re mom‘s lazy and in-between her ‘stories‘ she want you to get her a nice cold beer. She could say, “hey you get me a beer!” but who is hey you? Instead she should say, “hey -insert your name here- get me a beer!” That way she knows who she‘s directing it at. At that moment you become -insert your name here- that‘s who you are and it‘s part of your identity. Of course there‘s more to -insert your name-, but I am too lazy to get in to that. The same thing with labels. It describes who you are and identifies at least a part of you. Labels and cliques are sort of like super cool secret clubs. There‘s nothing wrong with identifying yourself with certain people who share your same views is there?
I am sorry for butchering your topic but I felt the need to rant about it. I feel so bad that I‘ll post my definition of punk when I am not feeling so lazy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:29 pm
Actually Dagmar, at first I was going to ask that question, but I thought I should ask one question at a time. And I totally agree with you. To me, punk isn't a label, it's a group- like this guild. Politically intelligent and mature people, with good taste in music. And Rebel- the point of quoting that was the true meaning- the fact that doing something just because someone else said it's punk is mindless trendfollowing, and therefore not punk at all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:34 pm
Now, the reason for me not calling myself a punk is not that I'm against labels, it's because punk is dead and I just see it as disrespectful. I think that anyone who calls themselvs, or anything, punk is like pissing on its grave. I see, and label myself, as an anarchist. Because, while punk is dead, the idea will live on forever.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:13 am
"It never called itself Punk, only the people who cashed in on it did"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 6:31 pm
Dagmar get krank If you call yourself punk you're automatically not punk! It's the law.
I know I am supposed to discuss what punk means but this is my guild and I'll post what I want in it. So rather than talking about what punk means I am going to talk about my thoughts on labeling.
ahem- Many thirteen year old Wiccan bisexuals who shop at hot topic will tell you that labels are for soup cans. While I do enjoy being able to tell the difference from a delicious can of tomato soup from a cold and soggy soup of cream of chicken I believe that labels can be used for oh so much more! Imagine for a moment that you live in a trailer and that your mother is too poor to afford condoms ( you do live in a trailer). Needless to say she has 12 kids running around the place. You‘re mom‘s lazy and in-between her ‘stories‘ she want you to get her a nice cold beer. She could say, “hey you get me a beer!” but who is hey you? Instead she should say, “hey -insert your name here- get me a beer!” That way she knows who she‘s directing it at. At that moment you become -insert your name here- that‘s who you are and it‘s part of your identity. Of course there‘s more to -insert your name-, but I am too lazy to get in to that. The same thing with labels. It describes who you are and identifies at least a part of you. Labels and cliques are sort of like super cool secret clubs. There‘s nothing wrong with identifying yourself with certain people who share your same views is there?
I am sorry for butchering your topic but I felt the need to rant about it. I feel so bad that I‘ll post my definition of punk when I am not feeling so lazy. my thoughts isnt against the word punk, its against the word "a" that comes before it. "a" refers to you as not being individual, as simply being an extension of what your associating yourself with. i follow the beat to my own drum, not someone elses. its cool and all, but instead of saying your a punk, say your a liberal, or a liberitarian, or a socialist, or an anarchist, or whatever varying political party you might be part of. punk is a movement, not a stereotype. i dont get pride out of being a "punk", i get pride out of my dedication to making a difference and my many political stances. calling yourself a punk doesnt work for me because my definition of someone who could be considered a punk is that they like the music, they believe in equality, and they believe in freedom. that leaves such a large gap there for you to choose your own political views that all might have the same basis of freedom and equality. calling yourself a punk is too broad of a statement to me. to show who you truly are, talk about your political views, not what stereotype you fit into
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:03 pm
I do not now, nor do I ever intend to call myself a punk. I don't know what I am, I don't know who I am and in all honesty I could care less. I like the idea of personal freedom, free thought, equality for all and, in a moment of pure irony, all that makes me a conservative. A definition lost in translation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:23 pm
Actually, my official label is star-wars freak... It's all I used to talk about.. I played every game I could get my hands on, i had like, 30 SW posters, the soundtracks for all of them... i used to be.. until the 3rd movie... that really let me down (except for Padme Dying, that was funny). I still play Star Wars Galaxies (when I can) but i'm not all that much of a fanatic...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:20 am
potato the antichrist "It never called itself Punk, only the people who cashed in on it did" Any movement, group, ideal, etc. will be given a name, no matter how hard you try to stop it. You can rebel against the label, for no reason other than the fact that it's a label, or you can embrace it, not because it's a label, but because of what the label STANDS for. PL3453_K1LL_M3 Now, the reason for me not calling myself a punk is not that I'm against labels, it's because punk is dead and I just see it as disrespectful. I think that anyone who calls themselvs, or anything, punk is like pissing on its grave. I see, and label myself, as an anarchist. Because, while punk is dead, the idea will live on forever. As Mike Virus said, "If punk's dead, then what's this noise we're making?"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:16 pm
newatreides potato the antichrist "It never called itself Punk, only the people who cashed in on it did" Any movement, group, ideal, etc. will be given a name, no matter how hard you try to stop it. You can rebel against the label, for no reason other than the fact that it's a label, or you can embrace it, not because it's a label, but because of what the label STANDS for. PL3453_K1LL_M3 Now, the reason for me not calling myself a punk is not that I'm against labels, it's because punk is dead and I just see it as disrespectful. I think that anyone who calls themselvs, or anything, punk is like pissing on its grave. I see, and label myself, as an anarchist. Because, while punk is dead, the idea will live on forever. As Mike Virus said, "If punk's dead, then what's this noise we're making?" thats true, but stand for punk as a movement and not as a stereotype. i like the message, but songs like sheena was a punk rocker from the ramones, and tragedy from the casualties(the whole chorus is "PUNK ROCK TRAGEDY!", and any song that says the word punk in it pisses me off. you know why? kuz what the ******** is that supposed to do for anyone else? its cool that sheena was a punk rocker, its cool that one dude was born to lose... but that right there is using punk as a stereotype, and using it that way does absolutely NOTHING for the general population and doesnt even go as far as attempting to. the way i look at it is anyone using the punk label is being a follower instead of a leader. its hard for me to explain what i mean, but the label of punk does nothing for anyone, its the message it brings about that does something. instead of being so quick to say youre a punk, be quick to explain your political views, ESPECIALLY if youre talking to someone who isnt into punk. some people dont know what it is, and saying youre a punk again, does nothing. also, ive faced alot of criticism because people assume im your average person who calls themself a punk, which i dont. im secure enough to devote my life to a message instead of a stereotype. im just going to repeat myself again... punk is NOTHING, its message is something
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:04 pm
RebelRockerRanger thats true, but stand for punk as a movement and not as a stereotype. i like the message, but songs like sheena was a punk rocker from the ramones, and tragedy from the casualties(the whole chorus is "PUNK ROCK TRAGEDY!", and any song that says the word punk in it pisses me off. you know why? kuz what the ******** is that supposed to do for anyone else? its cool that sheena was a punk rocker, its cool that one dude was born to lose... but that right there is using punk as a stereotype, and using it that way does absolutely NOTHING for the general population and doesnt even go as far as attempting to. the way i look at it is anyone using the punk label is being a follower instead of a leader. its hard for me to explain what i mean, but the label of punk does nothing for anyone, its the message it brings about that does something. instead of being so quick to say youre a punk, be quick to explain your political views, ESPECIALLY if youre talking to someone who isnt into punk. some people dont know what it is, and saying youre a punk again, does nothing. also, ive faced alot of criticism because people assume im your average person who calls themself a punk, which i dont. im secure enough to devote my life to a message instead of a stereotype. im just going to repeat myself again... punk is NOTHING, its message is something [rant="newatreides"]Yeah but not every song has to have a point. I personally don't like the Ramones, ironically because none of their songs had a point, and I'm not a HUGE fan of the Casualties. And I too have had people make false assumptions about the word "punk", both bad and... well, worse. But I don't listen to what other people say, because in the end, I know I'm right and they're wrong. Having a message, achieving something, is all nice and fine, but not if you can't have fun too. And I, personally, prefer to identify myself by what I like, rather than what I don't like. Calling yourself a punk isn't too far removed from the "normal" way of identifying yourself; by your job. Just like most people are known by what they do, as are we, but in a different way. [/rant]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:21 pm
newatreides RebelRockerRanger thats true, but stand for punk as a movement and not as a stereotype. i like the message, but songs like sheena was a punk rocker from the ramones, and tragedy from the casualties(the whole chorus is "PUNK ROCK TRAGEDY!", and any song that says the word punk in it pisses me off. you know why? kuz what the ******** is that supposed to do for anyone else? its cool that sheena was a punk rocker, its cool that one dude was born to lose... but that right there is using punk as a stereotype, and using it that way does absolutely NOTHING for the general population and doesnt even go as far as attempting to. the way i look at it is anyone using the punk label is being a follower instead of a leader. its hard for me to explain what i mean, but the label of punk does nothing for anyone, its the message it brings about that does something. instead of being so quick to say youre a punk, be quick to explain your political views, ESPECIALLY if youre talking to someone who isnt into punk. some people dont know what it is, and saying youre a punk again, does nothing. also, ive faced alot of criticism because people assume im your average person who calls themself a punk, which i dont. im secure enough to devote my life to a message instead of a stereotype. im just going to repeat myself again... punk is NOTHING, its message is something [rant="newatreides"]Yeah but not every song has to have a point. I personally don't like the Ramones, ironically because none of their songs had a point, and I'm not a HUGE fan of the Casualties. And I too have had people make false assumptions about the word "punk", both bad and... well, worse. But I don't listen to what other people say, because in the end, I know I'm right and they're wrong. Having a message, achieving something, is all nice and fine, but not if you can't have fun too. And I, personally, prefer to identify myself by what I like, rather than what I don't like. Calling yourself a punk isn't too far removed from the "normal" way of identifying yourself; by your job. Just like most people are known by what they do, as are we, but in a different way. [/rant] ya but you could say that about anybody, preps, jocks, goths, emos, but theyre all still stereotypes. atleast people who do a working paying job arent always the same. your job doesnt define who you are, but the only reason people use the punk label is to define who they are, and everyones personality is alot deeper than just being a punk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:09 pm
newatreides As Mike Virus said, "If punk's dead, then what's this noise we're making?" Answer: Crappy chaos punk lolol actually bands like the virus are what make punk not much more than a fashion and an "i dont give a ********" attitude. its funny how their booklets are chok full of their pics, the band with a jacked on on a street, the band with the jacket OFF in another street, the band with the same jacket but DIFFERENT PATCHES on another street, etc. punk has different subgroups, so you cant really stereotype them into one definition. one definition would be "angsty youth counterculture". i am an anarchopunk so i dont really believe that, but i dont really give a ******** what punk is, much more things going on than some lousy culture fad.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:22 pm
bootlog newatreides As Mike Virus said, "If punk's dead, then what's this noise we're making?" Answer: Crappy chaos punk lolol actually bands like the virus are what make punk not much more than a fashion and an "i dont give a ********" attitude. its funny how their booklets are chok full of their pics, the band with a jacked on on a street, the band with the jacket OFF in another street, the band with the same jacket but DIFFERENT PATCHES on another street, etc. punk has different subgroups, so you cant really stereotype them into one definition. one definition would be "angsty youth counterculture". i am an anarchopunk so i dont really believe that, but i dont really give a ******** what punk is, much more things going on than some lousy culture fad. another definition is:a young male partner of a homosexual
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|