| Is this Ranking system Ok? |
| Yes |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
| No |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Could use improvement |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:09 pm
1.Oathmaster
2.Lord Knight
3.Royal Knight
4.High Knight
5.Silver Knight
6.Gaia Knight
This is the ranking system that several of us came up with as a group. So vote and if we vote yes, this will become our ranking system.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:11 pm
Could DEFINETLY use some improvements. Like no king or queen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:12 pm
Dr.Thorax Could DEFINETLY use some improvements. Like no king or queen. What makes you say that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:20 pm
Oh I don't know...SOME people could be a little power hungry and change things to make them more powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:23 pm
Dr.Thorax Oh I don't know...SOME people could be a little power hungry and change things to make them more powerful. ....I changed it already if you haven't noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:37 pm
If you vote Needs Improvement, please explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:37 pm
I find the paladin superflous, since Royal Knights are the highest you can go, next to the lord knight you is the overseer and second in command. unless the Paladin is considered the Order Chaplain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:39 pm
Well...I am totally confused...So whatever seems best with you guys...I guess I'll go with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:39 pm
OS_Bowen I find the paladin superflous, since Royal Knights are the highest you can go, next to the lord knight you is the overseer and second in command. unless the Paladin is considered the Order Chaplain? You're gonna have explain what superflous is, if you don't mind...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:40 pm
OS_Bowen I find the paladin superflous, since Royal Knights are the highest you can go, next to the lord knight you is the overseer and second in command. unless the Paladin is considered the Order Chaplain? WHat I was thinking was have the first 3 only have 1 person there, so we have 1st, 2cd, and 3rd in command. A Paladin has always been, in my mind, like the highest a knight can go. Besides the Overseer that is. But I want to see your opinions too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:43 pm
Sabatini_7 OS_Bowen I find the paladin superflous, since Royal Knights are the highest you can go, next to the lord knight you is the overseer and second in command. unless the Paladin is considered the Order Chaplain? You're gonna have explain what superflous is, if you don't mind... A fancy word for unecissary, pardon me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:46 pm
The way I imagined it, and I already cast my vote for yes by the way, was that the Oathmaster was incharge, the Lord Knight the Second in Command, and the Royal Knights his lieutennants executing the wishes of the two higher ups, there by makeing a caste of 3rd in command, leaving the rest of the ranks to be awarded due to valour, participation and other reasons unmentionable or unknown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:46 pm
OS_Bowen Sabatini_7 OS_Bowen I find the paladin superflous, since Royal Knights are the highest you can go, next to the lord knight you is the overseer and second in command. unless the Paladin is considered the Order Chaplain? You're gonna have explain what superflous is, if you don't mind... A fancy word for unecissary, pardon me. I just want there to be 3 high commands. I don't know who yet. But I travel alot and sometimes I can't get online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:47 pm
OS_Bowen The way I imagined it, and I already cast my vote for yes by the way, was that the Oathmaster was incharge, the Lord Knight the Second in Command, and the Royal Knights his lieutennants executing the wishes of the two higher ups, there by makeing a caste of 3rd in command, leaving the rest of the ranks to be awarded due to valour, participation and other reasons unmentionable or unknown. Good point. I will change it. See this is why I like feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
