|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 11:46 am
This rule has been around as long as the idea of Role Playing.
Nobody likes for their opponent to be able to launch billions of missiles out of a 1" x 1" box.
Here we will vote on whether we should ban the use of godmodding, or not.
And then define the exact definition of godmodding.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 3:11 pm
And yes, I think that we'll need to, as you stated, create a more exact definition of what is and what is not considered godmodding.
I have a question though; how would we be able to enforce such things as this? Once we see them, report them here, or ask for assistance from a representative from the guild to come and look? And what if people are not members of this guild and do not seek to agree to the words of one of our delegates?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:40 pm
Well, no matter how much it annoys all of us, but we cannot impose rules onto armies that are not in agreement with our rules, simple as that.
About how we enforce it, that's what the OGC's army could be used for twisted
EDIT- I know the poll just says "godmodding", say yay if you would like to ban godmodding, and nay if you are for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:00 am
Pakuun Well, no matter how much it annoys all of us, but we cannot impose rules onto armies that are not in agreement with our rules, simple as that. About how we enforce it, that's what the OGC's army could be used for twisted EDIT- I know the poll just says "godmodding", say yay if you would like to ban godmodding, and nay if you are for it. ((>_< Screwed me up there Pakuun, that one Nay vote is mine because I thought it was the other way around. X_X))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:59 pm
Ok, so we're going to decide this poll as a success against godmodding.
Now to take up several pages deciding the exact definition of the term "godmodding"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 7:33 pm
BTW I've been voting on the "no opinon option" since you asked me not to vote either "or".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:07 pm
Crap. I thought "nay" was against god-moding. So shift that one more vote towards the "yay" side.
Though, god-moding is technically being able to survive anything. For instance, a shield being struck by a dozen MAC rounds. But still, being that unrealisitic isn't right either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:43 pm
I think you're missing the point Skyburn, these are our rules, granted we still are using terms from other references, we are starting fresh.
Therefore, nothing is "technically" anything, and everything is how we put it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
