TaliaDelune
I am by no means trying to offend you- I'm only curious- but how exactly have you made this poetry, and not just a collage of tweets, and minor notes of how your pictures aren't working? I'm all for expressionism. I just think it better for the expressionist to explain what they've done so that readers can find the separation between nothing and something
i wasn't offended; i just answered your question.
it's not just a tweet; it's a libel. these tweets are distorted truths from their source material.
an unfortunate tweet is like an unconventional poetic form. the rules are: write 140 characters using only words found in another article or paragraph.
so for example here's an unfortunate tweet from your statement above:
TaliaDelune
by no means only curious--but exact--poetry tweets
minor notes of expressionism.
think better of how readers can find
something from nothing
that is exactly 140 characters long (and i can prove it as i have tweeted it
here) and it was copied from your very own words, except i tweaked them to say something that you didn't actually say. this isn't as easy as you'd think because i have to use the same words, mostly in the same order as they appear in the source material, to create something new, without the permission of the author, and never going under or over the 140 character limit.
thus, the unfortunate tweet. does that adequately answer your question?