|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:31 pm
What do you think about it?
I personally think: "F*ck you, you greedy bastards i won't buy any of your games anymore!!!!!" scream
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:37 pm
ifcruel72 What do you think about it? I personally think: "F*ck you, you greedy bastards i won't buy any of your games anymore!!!!!" scream
EA has been doing this in their sports titles since 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:40 pm
BlitzkriegMagikarp ifcruel72 What do you think about it? I personally think: "F*ck you, you greedy bastards i won't buy any of your games anymore!!!!!" scream EA has been doing this in their sports titles since 2006. well good thing i don't care about sports titles since they are always the same anyway xd but now they want to put it in ALL the games they publish...i mean those games already have day 1 DLC'S and on disc DLC's which have to be unlocked by buying them...so you already get just half the game....now you also have to pay for little stuff now missing from the game
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:44 pm
ifcruel72 BlitzkriegMagikarp ifcruel72 What do you think about it? I personally think: "F*ck you, you greedy bastards i won't buy any of your games anymore!!!!!" scream EA has been doing this in their sports titles since 2006. well good thing i don't care about sports titles since they are always the same anyway xd but now they want to put it in ALL the games they publish...i mean those games already have day 1 DLC'S and on disc DLC's which have to be unlocked by buying them...so you already get just half the game....now you also have to pay for little stuff now missing from the game
NFL Blitz was a masterpiece for the PS1.
Honestly, this doesn't really concern me that much. After hearing about the new SimCity game's DRM I won't be purchasing another EA or Maxis game.
If people want to be stupid and feed into this system, I say let'em.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:58 pm
BlitzkriegMagikarp ifcruel72 BlitzkriegMagikarp ifcruel72 What do you think about it? I personally think: "F*ck you, you greedy bastards i won't buy any of your games anymore!!!!!" scream EA has been doing this in their sports titles since 2006. well good thing i don't care about sports titles since they are always the same anyway xd but now they want to put it in ALL the games they publish...i mean those games already have day 1 DLC'S and on disc DLC's which have to be unlocked by buying them...so you already get just half the game....now you also have to pay for little stuff now missing from the game NFL Blitz was a masterpiece for the PS1. Honestly, this doesn't really concern me that much. After hearing about the new SimCity game's DRM I won't be purchasing another EA or Maxis game. If people want to be stupid and feed into this system, I say let'em. that's what i thought too. i was really going to buy simcity. but forcing people to be online all the time is stupid emotion_facepalm ....i see the pirates setting sails cat_pirate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:29 am
Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up.
Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:12 am
Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:19 am
ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:17 pm
Shifting Blaze ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was. well at least they don't do what Crytek wants to do: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a462761/crytek-boss-purely-single-player-games-should-go-away.html "I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away," Yerli said. "However, I'm not saying that there will be no single-player experiences... it could be it's called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead," he added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:41 pm
I think I vomited fire a little bit upon reading that. Now I have heart burn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:33 pm
Shifting Blaze I think I vomited fire a little bit upon reading that. Now I have heart burn. have you heard about SimCity? it has Online-"Single-Player" and just released this week....and who would've guessed? the servers are down so no one can play xd i wonder why people don't realize that Online-"Single-Player" will also make them be unable to play the game once it's old and the servers are taken down forever. also it makes them unable to sell it after they are done palying it because it's bound to their account (prob. the main reason for this) ah, EA such greedy bastards xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:12 pm
ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was. well at least they don't do what Crytek wants to do: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a462761/crytek-boss-purely-single-player-games-should-go-away.html "I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away," Yerli said. "However, I'm not saying that there will be no single-player experiences... it could be it's called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead," he added. That is ironic, considering the huge successes Skyrim, Far Cry 3 and Dishonored were.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:36 pm
Lord Akhenaton ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was. well at least they don't do what Crytek wants to do: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a462761/crytek-boss-purely-single-player-games-should-go-away.html "I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away," Yerli said. "However, I'm not saying that there will be no single-player experiences... it could be it's called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead," he added. That is ironic, considering the huge successes Skyrim, Far Cry 3 and Dishonored were. they would still make such games...though you would have to be online all the time and there would be a social "feature" (though i'd consider that a bug xP) and to just think that would sell and work is insane. 1. imagine skyrim would be always online. the servers would crash more often then what is happening to SimCity right now. 2. people would be outraged. many would refuse to buy it or wait until an offline crack is available. 3. it would cost so much more just to keep the servers running, if every game was always online. 4. most games would not be playable after 10 years since they would not release an offline patch for every game because it would just cost too much. it seems to me like Crytek wants to commit suicide. EA on the other hand has more money, for them it's just (to say it with skyrim's words) an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 1:54 am
ifcruel72 Lord Akhenaton ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Wheee. So shitty company decides to pick the most money making route for their product. Who cares if the fans stop playing, someone's gonna pick it up. Seriously. ******** 'em. Though I'd like to see an article or something on where you got this info from. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/27/electronic-arts-building-microtransactions-into-all-future-games Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was. well at least they don't do what Crytek wants to do: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a462761/crytek-boss-purely-single-player-games-should-go-away.html "I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away," Yerli said. "However, I'm not saying that there will be no single-player experiences... it could be it's called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead," he added. That is ironic, considering the huge successes Skyrim, Far Cry 3 and Dishonored were. they would still make such games...though you would have to be online all the time and there would be a social "feature" (though i'd consider that a bug xP) and to just think that would sell and work is insane. 1. imagine skyrim would be always online. the servers would crash more often then what is happening to SimCity right now. 2. people would be outraged. many would refuse to buy it or wait until an offline crack is available. 3. it would cost so much more just to keep the servers running, if every game was always online. 4. most games would not be playable after 10 years since they would not release an offline patch for every game because it would just cost too much. it seems to me like Crytek wants to commit suicide. EA on the other hand has more money, for them it's just (to say it with skyrim's words) an arrow to the knee. Well to be fair, I do have to be online to at least start up Skyrim, but the difference is that I don't have to continuously be online to have it. The truth is that PC gamers have no choice on that matter, but I can still play any game I want, old or new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 1:58 am
Lord Akhenaton ifcruel72 Lord Akhenaton ifcruel72 Shifting Blaze Well, they have enough playable games in their current library. Not gonna pick up anything new. But if I do, I'll be damned sure that the microbullshit isn't invasive to the friggin game. Like the one in dead space 3 kinda was. well at least they don't do what Crytek wants to do: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a462761/crytek-boss-purely-single-player-games-should-go-away.html "I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away," Yerli said. "However, I'm not saying that there will be no single-player experiences... it could be it's called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead," he added. That is ironic, considering the huge successes Skyrim, Far Cry 3 and Dishonored were. they would still make such games...though you would have to be online all the time and there would be a social "feature" (though i'd consider that a bug xP) and to just think that would sell and work is insane. 1. imagine skyrim would be always online. the servers would crash more often then what is happening to SimCity right now. 2. people would be outraged. many would refuse to buy it or wait until an offline crack is available. 3. it would cost so much more just to keep the servers running, if every game was always online. 4. most games would not be playable after 10 years since they would not release an offline patch for every game because it would just cost too much. it seems to me like Crytek wants to commit suicide. EA on the other hand has more money, for them it's just (to say it with skyrim's words) an arrow to the knee. Well to be fair, I do have to be online to at least start up Skyrim, but the difference is that I don't have to continuously be online to have it. The truth is that PC gamers have no choice on that matter, but I can still play any game I want, old or new. wtf? oO you don't have to be online to start skyrim. also steam has an offline mode...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
