|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:17 am
These are my favorite. 3nodding Hadn't ever heard of lomography, so looked it up. Seems quite interesting! Thanks for sharing and teaching me something new.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:24 pm
ReaperSong These are my favorite. 3nodding Hadn't ever heard of lomography, so looked it up. Seems quite interesting! Thanks for sharing and teaching me something new. For sure. my pleasure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:52 am
I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:02 pm
scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:18 pm
Glo-Fi Waves scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees! Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:21 pm
scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees! Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:26 pm
Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees! Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography. Right but usually in abstracts there is a point of focus / interest. Its just so messy and jumbled with lines leading your eye out of the image and nothing to lead you back in. The idea is not terrible its just not executed in the best way. Also lomography is still photography the same basic rules apply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:37 pm
scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees! Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography. Right but usually in abstracts there is a point of focus / interest. Its just so messy and jumbled with lines leading your eye out of the image and nothing to lead you back in. The idea is not terrible its just not executed in the best way. Well. not all abstracts are the same. specially with lomography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:48 pm
Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic I think the second one is your keeper. The rest are too busy or just not compositionally interesting. I think the 6th would have been much better if you had not cut off the land. The text in the 5th does not save the image... It would have been nicer if you found text to double expose that image with rather than just using photo shop to add text. Now go try subjects that are less cliche. Every beginner starts with the tress and telephone poles. Step it up. Thank you so much for the constructive criticism! I have a few questions though.. what do you mean by ''too busy''? and I couldn't understand what you meant on the text part.. and these are just a few. I got tons more. more than just telephone poles and trees! Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography. Right but usually in abstracts there is a point of focus / interest. Its just so messy and jumbled with lines leading your eye out of the image and nothing to lead you back in. The idea is not terrible its just not executed in the best way. Well. not all abstracts are the same. specially with lomography. Again "Also lomography is still photography the same basic rules apply." Basically you really just need to work on composition and play with lighting more. But with 7 years studying photography and 3 years in the business what do I know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:53 pm
scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography. Right but usually in abstracts there is a point of focus / interest. Its just so messy and jumbled with lines leading your eye out of the image and nothing to lead you back in. The idea is not terrible its just not executed in the best way. Well. not all abstracts are the same. specially with lomography. Again "Also lomography is still photography the same basic rules apply." Basically you really just need to work on composition and play with lighting more. But with 7 years studying photography and 3 years in the business what do I know? Golden rules of Lomography. 10 › Don't worry about any rules!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:02 pm
Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Glo-Fi Waves scelestic Your welcome. When I say too busy I mean there are so many lines and things going through the photo your eye does not know what to focus on. There is no real subject. The text does not add anything to the image. It would be better off without the text though personally id say that photo is not a keeper. Nothing is in focus and the composition is not that interesting. Ohhh alright. well I didn't mean to create a focus point on something. but just to create something abstract. which is one of the points of lomography. Right but usually in abstracts there is a point of focus / interest. Its just so messy and jumbled with lines leading your eye out of the image and nothing to lead you back in. The idea is not terrible its just not executed in the best way. Well. not all abstracts are the same. specially with lomography. Again "Also lomography is still photography the same basic rules apply." Basically you really just need to work on composition and play with lighting more. But with 7 years studying photography and 3 years in the business what do I know? Golden rules of Lomography. 10 › Don't worry about any rules! Limited creative control (most are just point and shoots with little or no manual settings) & no rules... where is the art in it then? =/ I still think learning the basics of photography would be a huge help in your images no matter the type of camera or film you are using.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:07 pm
Again "Also lomography is still photography the same basic rules apply."
Basically you really just need to work on composition and play with lighting more.
But with 7 years studying photography and 3 years in the business what do I know?
Rules are meant to be broken, and not everything has to follow rules. An art is how you see it not by what rules you have to follow. School and work experience has nothing to do with whether or not you know your stuff since some people don't even go to school and get jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:43 pm
 My friend Garrett Gonzales with his hang-timing Airwalk off the bank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
