Welcome to Gaia! ::

Posting the basic lands you do run would be nice.

Counts on your sections would be good too.

I count 74 total main deck cards and 15 lands, leaving 25 basics for 40 total land.

That's about right if its what you're actually playing.

I would rework your non land mana fixing.

I'd go with Signets over Borderposts. I've played with borderposts and they just aren't very good. They also fill land slots more than artifact mana slots and if you're running 40 lands you don't need any more.

If you like Weird Harvest, the G collective card from the Commander precons would be a good play.

Otherwise, Kodama's Reach and Cultivate are the best landsearch for a reason. They're much better than Harrow.

Paradise Mantle is an awful card in a deck with no cheap creatures that don't already tap for mana. I'd replace it with Wayfarer's Bauble but a Signet is also an option.

So is Expedition Map.

Darksteel Ingot and Coalition Relic are both strictly better than Manalith. I like Relic in Dragon decks because it lets you hit 6 mana on turn 4.

I would put in Mirrodin's Core, Evolving Wilds, and Terramorphic Expanse as additional multi lands. Also Exotic Orchard since it's bound to get you at least 1 color you need and probably more.

I might drop the Myr for non creature fixing. Creatures die so easily in EDH that you're better off with landfetch (which can be attached to a creature like Sakura-Tribe Elder or Farhaven Elf) or noncreature artifact mana than myr.

That's all I have time for right now. I have more to say about the rest of the deck but for now: I'd consider some cheap utility creatures and some instant speed spot removal. You seem to have few early game plays and almost no way to interact with your opponents.

I am running
I am running 25 basic lands 17 special lands So that means I am running a little more than 42 lands total

I count 59 non land cards. If you're running 42 land (and I only see 15 nonbasic lands) then you're at 101/99 cards and need to drop two.

Anyway, I'll talk about the creatures this time:

You want to list Nighteyes as "Nezumi Graverobber" or "Nezumi Graverobber//Nighteyes the Desecrator" Probably the former since that's how it shows up on search engines.

In any case, he's a good card and an example of the sort of utility creatures I think you should be running.

Hellkite Hatchling isn't a terribly good card to begin with and you have nothing that you want to devour with it . It can be dropped.

Volcanic Dragon is overpriced and underpowered. You can find a better alternative.

Brawn only works if you have a forest out and you only have 7 forests and a couple of ways to fetch them. You also lack many discard outlets so the only way to put it in the graveyard besides playing it (wasteful) is Buried Alive.

I'm not a fan of Elvish Piper. It's very vulnerable to removal and you have to untap with it before it will do you any good.

Kaalia has the same problems. She's a good general but a bad maindeck card.

I'd be inclined to drop the cards that put things into play from your hand entirely. Just focus on having enough ramp to play what you draw in the later game and focus on reanimation in the earlier game (more draw/discard might be good.)

thats where the hand size comes in i have the same issue with my tezzerttes and karn

I have two karns same card yes but i have the two in my deck the same with my four plautnium angels hand size just helps ur planing method

i never had a issue when i played comps with it ive use the same deck for a year i added karn 3 monthes ago

Fatestitcher is correct.

It's Elder Dragon Highlander. As in "there can only be one."