Now to compare and contrast the Fall in Gnostic thought and traditional thought. In the Gnostic mythos, the Fall is a result of disobedience like in the traditional mythos but the difference lies in the characters committing the disobedience. Instead of humans disobeying YHVH and having an "apple break", you have Sophia trying to know God without her partner (wisdom without experience and love). The Fall was the creation of the universe in the Gnostic mythos.
One of the criticisms that falsely slams Gnostics as "devil worshipers" or "anti-semetic" is that the mythos teaches that eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil is a good thing and salvific. If anything the idea of eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (I will abbreviate as KoGaE) as a good thing does stem from Judaism. For whatever reason, God wanted man to eat the fruit, else why would he set up the situation for man to eat the fruit? When mankind partook of the fruit of the tree of the KoGaE, God set the gears in motion so mankind could eventually return back to God and mankind would have the ability to oppose the Authorities. The Authorities being those instinctual and psychological forces within ourselves and external to us that keep us from being the children of God that we are. Because of this gift from the Fruit, mankind is capable of receiving Salvation.
So discuss: Any other comparisons and contrasts between Genesis and the Gnostic Mythos? Any insights you wish to share with me about these two mythos?
On the Origin of the World One telling of the Gnostic Creation mythos.
The Secret Book of John Another telling of the Gnostic Creation mythos.
Both of these are similar in content and the overall story but differ in tone and finer details.
Alpha & Omega: Christian Gnostic Church
A Discussion group/Church inspired by the Gnostics and based on the NT and Nag Hammadi Library
![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
//
//
//
//
//
Have an account? Login Now!
