|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:34 pm
Whats your take on The Hobbit movie?
Should it be in two parts or one?
Would it be better if only one director was producing it?
Just wondering what you guys think.
Personally I think there should only be one director and one movie. Two of each would be so mix-matched.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:00 pm
If there were two directors it just wouldn't work out. whether the movies is in two parts or one it only needs one director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cTheAngelofMusic Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:10 pm
I say it should be directed my the person who detected the other 3 LOTR movies. and it should be one movie. but u know hollywood there in it for the money more movies = more money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:57 pm
I think there should be the Hobbit, and the in between movie that connects the Hobbit, and LOTRT. I think that would be awesome. You would get to know what happened in between. so awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:25 am
Has David Tennant been confirmed yet as King Thranduil??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
