|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:30 pm
i hate to say it man but some of those connections are weak. the kenpachi get so far on awesome sand orihme characters are similar but some of the image connects are weak. and the characters are rarely the same between "pladgerism" meaning at best he's stealing panel shapes. and the story is the bulk of the possible pladerized because you can only come up with so ,many epic positions and images especially if your inspiration is bleach or you watch and read alot of bleach
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:38 pm
Wow! Just noticed this now, though that's probably because I don't watch much Bleach (or anime, for that fact, anymore). Kind of reminds me of a fanfic writer who's stories get picked to be published, so then they have to go through and change all the names and some of the plot so it doesn't resemble anything too closely.
Art wise, I learned in college that if something is changed enough, it can be passed off as an "appropriated piece." An example is, I cut up a Time magazine issue removing the font lettering (but keeping a stylized version of the word "Time" and "All Boxed In" referring to the main article), as well as cutting out the cover picture of a human figure with various images and words overlapping through out the silhouette. I then printed a monochromatic lithograph from the magazine. So it still looked something like a magazine, but gutted and with a new meaning to it.
Appropriating material legally means you have to change the meaning behind that material (for example, if he had used cut outs of Bleach manga as pieces in a larger installation piece at an artshow).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
