Welcome to Gaia! ::

Refuge: The Society of Jesus - A Christian Guild

Back to Guilds

Discussions with fellow Christians, open to all to come and find info. on Christianity, and discussions 

Tags: Jesus God, Debate and Discuss, Christian, Religion, Love 

Reply Debate and Discussion
Original Sin Goto Page: 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:50 am


I know this is belief is widely taught amongst Catholics and protestants, but I want to point out that it appears to contradict the Bible.


Passage Ezekiel 18:20:

Quote:
20The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.


According to this passage, children do not inherit the sins their fathers have committed. So a baby is not born into sin, they are innocent.

Also according to Jesus, children are better models for purity than an adult is.

Passage Matthew 18:2-3:

Quote:
2And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

3And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:17 pm


I don't believe the Lord holds all accountable to sin at the same level: children, if they do something wrong, do it in innocence and do not know what they do is wrong. I think he personally, when it comes to children, people who have different mental/physical problems, and people who have never heard of Him, judges them by what they do know about them: one way or another, I believe everyone has a chance, and everyone has a choice. Babies are not really baptized, I don't believe: they are too young to even have any idea what is going on. He's a fair and loving God, so I believe he gives everyone a chance, and judges everyone accordingly to who they are, how they lived, how they tried to live, and what they knew to be right and wrong. (In other words, I think that he will show himself to everyone, either during life, waiting for judgment, or in the second coming when he goes through his list of life again.)

Angel of the End
Vice Captain

Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:04 pm


Angel of the End
I don't believe the Lord holds all accountable to sin at the same level: children, if they do something wrong, do it in innocence and do not know what they do is wrong. I think he personally, when it comes to children, people who have different mental/physical problems, and people who have never heard of Him, judges them by what they do know about them: one way or another, I believe everyone has a chance, and everyone has a choice. Babies are not really baptized, I don't believe: they are too young to even have any idea what is going on. He's a fair and loving God, so I believe he gives everyone a chance, and judges everyone accordingly to who they are, how they lived, how they tried to live, and what they knew to be right and wrong. (In other words, I think that he will show himself to everyone, either during life, waiting for judgment, or in the second coming when he goes through his list of life again.)


Okay, but do you believe that every one is punished just for their own transgressions or that they will be punished for the transgression of Adam along with their transgressions?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:24 pm


Shadows-shine
I know this is belief is widely taught amongst Catholics and protestants, but I want to point out that it appears to contradict the Bible.


Passage Ezekiel 18:20:

Quote:
20The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.


According to this passage, children do not inherit the sins their fathers have committed. So a baby is not born into sin, they are innocent.

Also according to Jesus, children are better models for purity than an adult is.

Passage Matthew 18:2-3:

Quote:
2And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

3And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.


It doesn't contradict the bible at all.


Romans 5: 14-15

14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

15 But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man's trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many.


The above is what the concept of Original Sin covers. In the book of wisdom it expands on this as well as in other places in the bible:

Wisdom 2:23-24

23 For God created man incorruptible, and to the image of his own likeness he made him.
24 But by the envy of the devil, death came into the world:


1 Cor. 15: 21

21 For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.



What the passages you've quoted refer to is something different, they aren't about the initial sin but the evils the follow as a result of that. What they were saying, is that if for example your father murders someone and is unrepentant then that transgression is not something that you will be held responsible for. Adam's sin on the other hand is the reason why we all need to be saved which is evident in the last scripture that I quoted from 1 Cor.

Semiremis
Crew


Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:40 am


Semiremis


It doesn't contradict the bible at all.


Romans 5: 14-15

14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

15 But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man's trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many.


The above is what the concept of Original Sin covers.

Actually it just says that sin and death came into the world because of Adam, but the Bible does not say that all men are sinners because of what Adam did. We are punished for our own transgressions, not Adam's and our own. Do you think Adam is going to be punished for your sins as well as his? Every one that I have asked this question to said that Adam will not be punished for their transgressions, just his own. Now how unfair is that for God to judge me according to Adam's transgression on top of my own.



Quote:
In the book of wisdom it expands on this as well as in other places in the bible:

Wisdom 2:23-24

23 For God created man incorruptible, and to the image of his own likeness he made him.
24 But by the envy of the devil, death came into the world:

What is the book of wisdom?

Yes, death came into the world, but sinning is some thing we choose to do, we don't automatically inherit it just because we were born


Quote:
1 Cor. 15: 21

21 For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.

Again, it only is talking about death. Not sinning.


Quote:
What the passages you've quoted refer to is something different, they aren't about the initial sin but the evils the follow as a result of that. What they were saying, is that if for example your father murders someone and is unrepentant then that transgression is not something that you will be held responsible for.

Obviously, but still why would I be held accountable for Adam's sin, when I didn't commit it? Adam isn't going to be held accountable for my short comings.

Quote:
Adam's sin on the other hand is the reason why we all need to be saved which is evident in the last scripture that I quoted from 1 Cor.


Yes, I agree with that to a point, but every one is not evil by nature because of what Adam did. The way I look at it is if we were all so evil by nature, then we wouldn't want to repent, we wouldn't want to be saved. I feel that we are good by nature and the only way the fall tainted us is that we will die, not be sinners automatically at birth.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:19 am


Shadows-shine
Semiremis


It doesn't contradict the bible at all.


Romans 5: 14-15

14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

15 But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man's trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many.


The above is what the concept of Original Sin covers.

Actually it just says that sin and death came into the world because of Adam, but the Bible does not say that all men are sinners because of what Adam did. We are punished for our own transgressions, not Adam's and our own. Do you think Adam is going to be punished for your sins as well as his? Every one that I have asked this question to said that Adam will not be punished for their transgressions, just his own. Now how unfair is that for God to judge me according to Adam's transgression on top of my own.



Quote:
In the book of wisdom it expands on this as well as in other places in the bible:

Wisdom 2:23-24

23 For God created man incorruptible, and to the image of his own likeness he made him.
24 But by the envy of the devil, death came into the world:

What is the book of wisdom?

Yes, death came into the world, but sinning is some thing we choose to do, we don't automatically inherit it just because we were born


Quote:
1 Cor. 15: 21

21 For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.

Again, it only is talking about death. Not sinning.


Quote:
What the passages you've quoted refer to is something different, they aren't about the initial sin but the evils the follow as a result of that. What they were saying, is that if for example your father murders someone and is unrepentant then that transgression is not something that you will be held responsible for.

Obviously, but still why would I be held accountable for Adam's sin, when I didn't commit it? Adam isn't going to be held accountable for my short comings.

Quote:
Adam's sin on the other hand is the reason why we all need to be saved which is evident in the last scripture that I quoted from 1 Cor.


Yes, I agree with that to a point, but every one is not evil by nature because of what Adam did. The way I look at it is if we were all so evil by nature, then we wouldn't want to repent, we wouldn't want to be saved. I feel that we are good by nature and the only way the fall tainted us is that we will die, not be sinners automatically at birth.

Death is the result of the original sin. Acting against God is sinning, God told Adam not to eat the fruit, Adam ate it and thus committing the first sin.

I don't think we are all evil either.

Here's how the Catholic Church explains it:

405 Although it is proper to each individual,295 original sin does not have the character of a personal fault in any of Adam's descendants. It is a deprivation of original holiness and justice, but human nature has not been totally corrupted: it is wounded in the natural powers proper to it, subject to ignorance, suffering and the dominion of death, and inclined to sin - an inclination to evil that is called concupiscence". Baptism, by imparting the life of Christ's grace, erases original sin and turns a man back towards God, but the consequences for nature, weakened and inclined to evil, persist in man and summon him to spiritual battle.
CCC 405

The book of Wisdom is a book in the Old Testament. Not all Churches consider it to be inspired but it's been a part of the Canon since the earliest Church councils at Carthage and Hippo, Martin Luther and his crew decided to get rid of it along with a few other text. He actually tried to take out the book of revelation, James, Esther, Hebrews and Jude as well. I don't think Calvin much cared for the book of revelation either. That's a completely separate topic of discussion though.

Semiremis
Crew


Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:28 pm


Semiremis


Death is the result of the original sin. Acting against God is sinning, God told Adam not to eat the fruit, Adam ate it and thus committing the first sin.

Yes, I agree, but the Original sin that has been taught to me when I was protestant was that all men automatically are sinful at birth because of Adam's transgression. When that seems to contradict the Bible. Sin comes from some willful act, not because we are mere mortals.
Quote:

I don't think we are all evil either.

Then why does the catholic church baptize infants?

Quote:
Here's how the Catholic Church explains it:

405 Although it is proper to each individual,295 original sin does not have the character of a personal fault in any of Adam's descendants. It is a deprivation of original holiness and justice, but human nature has not been totally corrupted: it is wounded in the natural powers proper to it, subject to ignorance, suffering and the dominion of death, and inclined to sin - an inclination to evil that is called concupiscence". Baptism, by imparting the life of Christ's grace, erases original sin and turns a man back towards God, but the consequences for nature, weakened and inclined to evil, persist in man and summon him to spiritual battle.
CCC 405


Man does not have to suffer from ignorance or death or even sin, if they choose not to. Every one has the potential to live a blameless and spotless life.

Quote:
The book of Wisdom is a book in the Old Testament.

Was written by Solomon?

Quote:
Not all Churches consider it to be inspired but it's been a part of the Canon since the earliest Church councils at Carthage and Hippo, Martin Luther and his crew decided to get rid of it along with a few other text.

Yes there was a lot of books removed from the Bible during the reformation. I'd been informed a while back that when King James translated his bible, it originally had 80 books in it, then when the Vatican got a hold of it they took 14 books out of it, leaving the Bible with only the 66 books that we have now.
Quote:
He actually tried to take out the book of revelation, James, Esther, Hebrews and Jude as well. I don't think Calvin much cared for the book of revelation either. That's a completely separate topic of discussion though.


I've read a lot on how they wanted to remove those books. There has also been a lot of debate on whether or not to take the Songs of Solomon out of the Bible too as it was not considered to be an inspired writing.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:34 pm


Shadows-shine
Semiremis


Death is the result of the original sin. Acting against God is sinning, God told Adam not to eat the fruit, Adam ate it and thus committing the first sin.

Yes, I agree, but the Original sin that has been taught to me when I was protestant was that all men automatically are sinful at birth because of Adam's transgression. When that seems to contradict the Bible. Sin comes from some willful act, not because we are mere mortals.
Quote:

I don't think we are all evil either.

Then why does the catholic church baptize infants?


The answer is quoted below in the CCC 405:

Quote:
Quote:
Here's how the Catholic Church explains it:

405 Although it is proper to each individual,295 original sin does not have the character of a personal fault in any of Adam's descendants. It is a deprivation of original holiness and justice, but human nature has not been totally corrupted: it is wounded in the natural powers proper to it, subject to ignorance, suffering and the dominion of death, and inclined to sin - an inclination to evil that is called concupiscence". Baptism, by imparting the life of Christ's grace, erases original sin and turns a man back towards God, but the consequences for nature, weakened and inclined to evil, persist in man and summon him to spiritual battle.
CCC 405


Man does not have to suffer from ignorance or death or even sin, if they choose not to. Every one has the potential to live a blameless and spotless life.


I'm not sure where you get that from. Pelagianism is a very old heresy, it was deemed as such back in the 4th century (around that time). We all die physically, and we only are saved through the grace of God. Mormon theology says otherwise?


Quote:
Quote:
The book of Wisdom is a book in the Old Testament.

Was written by Solomon?


The author is unknown but it's written in the person of Solomon (his sentiments are expressed).

Quote:
Quote:
Not all Churches consider it to be inspired but it's been a part of the Canon since the earliest Church councils at Carthage and Hippo, Martin Luther and his crew decided to get rid of it along with a few other text.

Yes there was a lot of books removed from the Bible during the reformation. I'd been informed a while back that when King James translated his bible, it originally had 80 books in it, then when the Vatican got a hold of it they took 14 books out of it, leaving the Bible with only the 66 books that we have now.


The Vatican didn't take any books out of the bible, the Canon recognized by the Church to day was established and recognized back at Carthage and Hippo (4th to early fifth century). The protestants removed the deuterocanon (seven books in the OT) from the bible.

Quote:
Quote:
He actually tried to take out the book of revelation, James, Esther, Hebrews and Jude as well. I don't think Calvin much cared for the book of revelation either. That's a completely separate topic of discussion though.


I've read a lot on how they wanted to remove those books. There has also been a lot of debate on whether or not to take the Songs of Solomon out of the Bible too as it was not considered to be an inspired writing.

That's one reason why protestant Christianity never really made sense to me. It's all dependent upon a book compiled by the Catholic Church through the authority of God, without that authority of God part it's far to easy to fall astray from the inspired text since God gave us his church to guide us.

Semiremis
Crew


Lance Fulgurant

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:50 pm


I don't believe that the concept of original sin means that we will be punished for the sins of those that came before us. it merely means that there was no sin, but then adam and eve at the fruit, allowing sin into the world.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:19 pm


The punishment for Adam's sin was mortality (in the physical sense); if you are mortal, then you are suffering Adam's punishment, plain and simple.

Shadows-shine, how are you missing the blatancy of Romans 5:14?

"y that one person's transgression the many died"!

Because of one person's sin, we are all physically mortal.

Shadows-shine
Now how unfair is that for God to judge me according to Adam's transgression on top of my own.


How would it be unfair? He made you, he can do what he wants with you!

"Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for a noble purpose and another for an ignoble one?"

IcarusDream


Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:41 am


IcarusDream
The punishment for Adam's sin was mortality (in the physical sense); if you are mortal, then you are suffering Adam's punishment, plain and simple.
Being mortal is not a punishment. It's just a step in life that we all have to go through. Mortality is a consequence of the fall, not a punishment. Besides if it were a punishment then Christ Himself would've been punished too.

Quote:
Shadows-shine, how are you missing the blatancy of Romans 5:14?

"y that one person's transgression the many died"!

Because of one person's sin, we are all physically mortal.

I know all about that. But the orignial sin that I was taught is that we are all automatically sinful because of what Adam did, and that's what I don't agree with.

Quote:
Shadows-shine
Now how unfair is that for God to judge me according to Adam's transgression on top of my own.


How would it be unfair? He made you, he can do what he wants with you!


I know God created me, but that would be unjust if I were to stand before Him on Judgement Day and for Him to tell me that I was a bad person because Adam disobeyed a commandment, but yet in my mortal life I obeyed that commandment. That's what wouldn't be fair and that's how the original sin was taught to me that we are punished for Adam's transgression as well as our own on judgement day. God is not an unjust God. He is all about fairness. We're not under Satan's rules. We're under God's.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:46 am


Lance Fulgurant
I don't believe that the concept of original sin means that we will be punished for the sins of those that came before us. it merely means that there was no sin, but then adam and eve at the fruit, allowing sin into the world.


That's how I view too, but I don't call it the original sin.

Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter


Semiremis
Crew

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:01 pm


Shadows-shine
Lance Fulgurant
I don't believe that the concept of original sin means that we will be punished for the sins of those that came before us. it merely means that there was no sin, but then adam and eve at the fruit, allowing sin into the world.


That's how I view too, but I don't call it the original sin.


Doing something God tells you not to do isn't a sin?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:30 pm


Semiremis
Shadows-shine
Lance Fulgurant
I don't believe that the concept of original sin means that we will be punished for the sins of those that came before us. it merely means that there was no sin, but then adam and eve at the fruit, allowing sin into the world.


That's how I view too, but I don't call it the original sin.


Doing something God tells you not to do isn't a sin?


That's not what I said. I know that doing some thing God tells you not to is a sin, but I don't agree with the whole "Just because one sinned, every one is a sinner" idea.

Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter


Shadows-shine

Invisible Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:35 pm


Semiremis


I'm not sure where you get that from. Pelagianism is a very old heresy, it was deemed as such back in the 4th century (around that time). We all die physically, and we only are saved through the grace of God. Mormon theology says otherwise?


No, LDS theology teaches that sin brings death and that we are redeemed by the grace of God, but we do not teach that because one man sinned all are automatically sinful.



Quote:
The author is unknown but it's written in the person of Solomon (his sentiments are expressed).

Interesting. I have this book called the Wisdom of Solomon that is supposedly a missing book of the Bible and I wasn't sure if it was the same thing.



Quote:
The Vatican didn't take any books out of the bible, the Canon recognized by the Church to day was established and recognized back at Carthage and Hippo (4th to early fifth century).

I wasn't accusing any one of removing any thing. I was just saying that I was informed of that.

Quote:
The protestants removed the deuterocanon (seven books in the OT) from the bible.


It was a protestant that told me different
Reply
Debate and Discussion

Goto Page: 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum
//
//

// //

Have an account? Login Now!

//
//