|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:46 pm
I have always found it very odd that, in the united states, at least, Movies are judged much more harshly, sometimes ridiculously so, in regards to any sexual content they may have as opposed to violence. This could be actually showing sexual relations, simple nudity, or even just talking about it (that was the rationalization behind Clerks' orignal NC-17 rating.) To my mind, the depiction of hurting, maiming, torturing or killing another person would be much more detrimental to the viewer than seeing someone involved in something both parties are enjoying. Now I'm not saying that we shouldn't place restrictions on viewings of sexually explicit material; however, I think it's a little disconcerting how much violence can be gotten away with in just a Pg-13 film. What are all your feelings on the topic? Which do think is more rephrehensible to expose viewers to?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:57 am
I used to think the same way, feeling that it was hypocritical for one to be criticized more than the other. However, as of late I find that people are more offended by sex than by violence. Most Americans I know are inured to violence and gore. In fact, gore is often the premise of a movie (Hostel, Saw, though I think Saw was far better in writing than Hostel) to lure movie-goers in. Though sex is used in the same way, it's often just something thrown in for ratings than for the plot. Choke didn't do as well as Fight Club, I remember it flopping - didn't stay in theaters long. I was actually going to go see it a few weeks after it came out and wasn't able to.
So yeah, sorry if that was a rather lengthy opinion. Hope it wasn't jumbled. D:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:09 pm
Well in my oppinion sex can be an uncomfortable subject for many people and alot of parents do try to keep their kids from seeing it and try to shield them from the outside world and keep them kids as long as possible. possibly because, thirteen year olds don't think it's alright to go out and have sex just because people on the movies do it. Kids are easily influenced, as you have seen with Twilight. Kid's this age do not need to be seeing or doing this kind of thing, which is probably why it is restricted to 17 and up. But violence on the other hand happens all the time, everyday, everywhere around us between every age group. It's kind of impossible to deflect that stuff from everyones veiw.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Such subjects are really touchy for some people, but personally I've been hardened to it because I like to study transgression and moral ambiguities. It's shocking what movies definitely do get away with, though. I've always been under the opinion that they'll get worse and worse as time goes on, but I can only hope not. Because while a large amount of people are adverse to such topics, sometimes they are also the ones who pay to see those films in theaters. After all, how many times have you heard someone talk about a movie they've seen only to end up criticizing it? Very many. It's a backwards demographic and the movie industry is just taking advantage of curiosity. I think that it depends on the movie to tell whether or not it's "okay" to watch, and also it might depend on why it's being seen. If they are both fairly reasonable, I might think the content is perfectly fine to watch.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:45 pm
Personally, I tend to get uncomfortable when watching a movie with sexually explicit content. I believe this is mainly due to the way I've been raised, though, as opposed to personal belief. (I never got to see a PG-13 movie all the way through until I was actually 13...) Although sexual content makes me feel somewhat awkward, I'm not very bothered by it once the scene is over. Unless there are multiple scenes, or the concept is the base of the entire film, there isn't really a problem. I prefer violence over sex, but that's because I've been exposed to violence for a number of years, and I still shy away from most sexual concepts. Sexual content is typically thrown in for the sake of ratings, anyway. And let's not forget the kind of people who aren't in the least upset by sex scenes and yet are continually disturbed by violence or gore. Some people go to the theater just for the gore, just as some go solely to be turned on by the sex scenes. Sometimes sexual content enhances character relationships. And sometimes all it does is make the rating go up. In my opinion, as long as there's actually a decent reason for the sex to be in there, it's fine.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:12 am
Thanks for your responses; they've given me a bit to mull over. But I wonder especially about this: I was also raised in the fashion that sexually explicit material is far less acceptable than graphically violent images. The type of stuff in Saw and the like bother me no more than it did when I was about 7 or so. However, I find a very reactionary point of view in myself in regards to sexual material. Because to my mind, sex is something generally happy and enjoyable or at least a lot of fun; ie, at its core, something positive (though I would be the first to admit that it can sometimes be anything but.) While violence is by its very nature causing damage to another person or thing, which to me would be generally negative. I just wonder why our culture is more accepting of the negative than the positive (though I know many don't share my view of those being inherently negative or positive.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:17 am
Well thing is some parent's like mine didn't let me know what sex was until I got into highschool. There is alot of parent's that want their kids to be "innocent" as long as possible. Christian parents and other religious people especially. To some people it is okay, it certainly seem's so now day's. But there is a majority of the population (parents) who doesn't want their kids to see stuff like that, at their age.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:59 am
Gnomes-san to my mind, sex is something generally happy and enjoyable or at least a lot of fun; ie, at its core, something positive (though I would be the first to admit that it can sometimes be anything but.) While violence is by its very nature causing damage to another person or thing, which to me would be generally negative. Yeah I suppose by its nature it's negative, but it's portrayed postively in some ways/place, like in Fight Club. It could just be pure sport. As cathartic as football.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:02 am
SuchSweetSadism Gnomes-san to my mind, sex is something generally happy and enjoyable or at least a lot of fun; ie, at its core, something positive (though I would be the first to admit that it can sometimes be anything but.) While violence is by its very nature causing damage to another person or thing, which to me would be generally negative. Yeah I suppose by its nature it's negative, but it's portrayed postively in some ways/place, like in Fight Club. It could just be pure sport. As cathartic as football. And yet, their are several people I know that have no trouble watching, say, the D-Day invasion from Saving Private Ryan but can't watch fight club because of the violence. Don't know what to make of that...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|