|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:44 pm
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/08/top-ten-geekiest-constructe-languages/
Yupyup.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:26 pm
Lol sad that only one of the ones on that list I did not know...
Thanks for the post man
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:10 pm
Pretty cool.
The only one I didn't know about was #8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:06 pm
It's not exactly a good article about the geekiest constructed languages. It's like the guy was like "Hey, I know about ten constructed languages! I shall proclaim them the geekiest!" >>
It doesn't even include Lojban or Ithkuil, sheesh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Iconoclast Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:26 pm
Eccentric Iconoclast It's not exactly a good article about the geekiest constructed languages. It's like the guy was like "Hey, I know about ten constructed languages! I shall proclaim them the geekiest!" >> It doesn't even include Lojban or Ithkuil, sheesh. Under that list I would have posted Lojban up with Esperanto, but Ithkuil would be better still, I agree. And Huttanese is barely even developed! it's more like a cave speech Xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:59 am
Uh, Lojban is nothing like Esperanto. Their only similarity is that they were developed to be international auxiliary languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eccentric Iconoclast Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:42 am
I got all excited and then I read it and I was like bleh. =(
Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:47 pm
Heh, yeah, I wanted to see y'all's reactions. It definitely did seem sort of like I'll just choose the ones I know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:56 pm
I thought it was interesting that they included Fremen from Dune. I didn't know that was an actual language. I thought it was just nonsensical made up words that existed only to the extent that they needed it to for the script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:36 pm
Wow, uhh, to admit, I wouldn't have put Gelfling in there. Yeah, it may have been an interesting language, but the key words there were "briefly mentioned"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:59 am
More grammar!// then again I revise that statement it'll take hell of a grammar teacher to explain all that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
