|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:43 pm
I just got back from seeing it in IMAX 3D with my boyfriend. I thought it was worth seeing, just not worth the extra to see it in 3D (only the first 10 minutes were, the rest of the movie was regular film). Did anyone else notice how much they added in this one?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:05 pm
I really liked it. They left alot out, but it was still good. Much better than the stupid 5th movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:40 am
I Thought It Was Amazing.
I Would Pay To See It Again If I Could.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:25 pm
it was good but it could have been way better for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:35 pm
So boring.
The only highlights were that Dumbledore finally dies and Tom Felton was hot and had more screentime than the last movie.
=|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:58 am
i thought it was too romantic comedy based, and left out far too much. it deviated from the book so much it was almost a different movie. there was alot less action and it went by really fast. the 3D part should have been the entire movie. it was good in its own right but compared to the book it was a horror-show.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:25 pm
it was okay better then the 4th and 5th
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:09 pm
honestly i thought it STUNK. the ending was horrible (nothing like the ending of the book) and they left a LOT out. im not saying that the movie wasnt enjoyable (because it was) but compared with the other movies they left a good deal out of this one. what happened to dumbledores funeral? that was supposed to happen!! but noooo.... they left it out, and they left out the relationship that started to form between tonks and lupin... left out the story lupin tells harry about how he was turned into a werewolf... i can go on and on but i dont want to. but all in all i can give this movie a 7/10. good effort but it wasnt all there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Watching it after reading the book shows that it really sucked.. It wasn't worth it really. D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:35 pm
I thought it was pretty good . 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:44 pm
Didn't like it that much, hated the way it ended.... and don't even want to talk about the director! that guy can't control his scenes, they keep falling one over another. very disappointed and not looking forward to the two parted Deathly Hollows because its going to be directed by the same person. scream stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:22 pm
I thought they lefft WAY too much out but it was still worth seeing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:25 pm
O r a l F ii x a t i o n So boring.
The only highlights were that Dumbledore finally dies and Tom Felton was hot and had more screentime than the last movie.
=|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:31 pm
I have not seen it so...I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
