|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:06 pm
The bible states the sun revolves around the earth. Disproven (obviously). The bible states that rock badgers and rabbits chew cud. Obviously a fallacy. They state that bats are birds. It states that there are some insects that have 4 legs (all insects have 6 legs). The bible claims the earth has four corners and edges, or in other words is flat. It claims that there are 4 legged animals which can fly. It claims speech didn't evolve but was created in the Babel mythology. 1 Sam 2:8 even claims the earth rests on pillars (you know, because it's flat... needed some table legs to hold it up.) The bible claims that people who believe in Christ shall be able to survive the bites of poisonous snakes. The bible has been proven false in many places. So what makes it that the rest of it is true?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:07 pm
Please post the verses, etc., so I can answer your objections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:09 pm
mazuac Please post the verses, etc., so I can answer your objections. I do not know the Exact verses. However i posted one of the verses in it. Just respond on what i posted in the topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:20 pm
Aight, aight. I wanted to get the whole thing out but hang on...
---
1 Sam 2:8 - The verse says nothing of pillars. It reads...
"He (God) raises the poor from the dust
and lifts the needy from the ash heap;
he seats them with princes
and has them inherit a throne of honor.
'For the foundations of the earth are the Lord's;
upon them he has set the world.'"
This verse isn't asserting that the Earth is sitting on some form of foundation (whatever that is...?) It is saying that, well, God is in control of the earth. Basically, I don't know how to further explain this.
Also, the Bible ACTUALLY talks of the Earth being "suspended on nothing." And wow! It is!
I'll have to find the verse as the internet isn't helping me. It's in the Book of Job though (which happens to be one of the oldest books in the OT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:43 pm
bleh internet sources failure. However i do know that the bible says bats are birds and that the sun revolves around the earth (or at least can be interpreted that way) and the bugs have 4 legs.
And 100% of the bible is true and all scientists are wrong? Shame on you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:48 pm
Yeah, I think I remember at one point it including bats with birds, but I'd like to double check. I've never heard of a geocentric orbit in the Earth. And neither the bugs.
But, wait. How would he bugs thing be illogical?
And lol. You said "Shut up Atheist, your ruining the guild!" to yourself? Um... Hello?
The reason I said that was because your contradictions aren't, well, right? o-0
I laugh at many of the contradictions Atheist pull out of their hats. The reason? Many are an allegorical expression not meant to be taken as a serious statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:52 pm
mazuac Please post the verses, etc., so I can answer your objections. seconded. If you're going to post things like that, you need sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:55 pm
mazuac Yeah, I think I remember at one point it including bats with birds, but I'd like to double check. I've never heard of a geocentric orbit in the Earth. And neither the bugs.
But, wait. How would he bugs thing be illogical?
And lol. You said "Shut up Atheist, your ruining the guild!" to yourself? Um... Hello?
The reason I said that was because your contradictions aren't, well, right? o-0
I laugh at many of the contradictions Atheist pull out of their hats. The reason? Many are an allegorical expression not meant to be taken as a serious statement. i ment to click the second one. I fail at clicking XD The bugs would be illogical because no insect has less that six legs. And if it was not in the bible why was it commonly accepted in the church of the 1200-1700 when the church ran completely off the bible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:06 pm
Isaac742 mazuac Yeah, I think I remember at one point it including bats with birds, but I'd like to double check. I've never heard of a geocentric orbit in the Earth. And neither the bugs.
But, wait. How would he bugs thing be illogical?
And lol. You said "Shut up Atheist, your ruining the guild!" to yourself? Um... Hello?
The reason I said that was because your contradictions aren't, well, right? o-0
I laugh at many of the contradictions Atheist pull out of their hats. The reason? Many are an allegorical expression not meant to be taken as a serious statement. i ment to click the second one. I fail at clicking XD The bugs would be illogical because no insect has less that six legs. And if it was not in the bible why was it commonly accepted in the church of the 1200-1700 when the church ran completely off the bible. Lol, nice... razz
And... *goes to find stuff!* O:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:08 pm
mazuac Isaac742 mazuac Yeah, I think I remember at one point it including bats with birds, but I'd like to double check. I've never heard of a geocentric orbit in the Earth. And neither the bugs.
But, wait. How would he bugs thing be illogical?
And lol. You said "Shut up Atheist, your ruining the guild!" to yourself? Um... Hello?
The reason I said that was because your contradictions aren't, well, right? o-0
I laugh at many of the contradictions Atheist pull out of their hats. The reason? Many are an allegorical expression not meant to be taken as a serious statement. i ment to click the second one. I fail at clicking XD The bugs would be illogical because no insect has less that six legs. And if it was not in the bible why was it commonly accepted in the church of the 1200-1700 when the church ran completely off the bible. Lol, nice... razz
And... *goes to find stuff!* O: you know what i am finding? Cake farts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:11 pm
Leviticus 11:20-23
20 " 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. 21 There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. 22 Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. 23 But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
I don't see anything contradictory here... O:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:14 pm
mazuac Leviticus 11:20-23
20 " 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. 21 There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. 22 Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. 23 But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
I don't see anything contradictory here... O: Levitcus. I totally find that to be a credible source D: If i am correct those are not considered insect and are in a different Genus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:18 pm
Isaac742 mazuac Leviticus 11:20-23
20 " 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. 21 There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. 22 Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. 23 But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
I don't see anything contradictory here... O: Levitcus. I totally find that to be a credible source D: If i am correct those are not considered insect and are in a different Genus Your one to talk. >.< You made me find the verse for you! This was your argument to begin with...
Anyways, the Binomial Nomenclature classifying system, and the Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Genus, Species hadn't been established yet. (imagine that).
Therefore, they were considered insects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:23 pm
mazuac Isaac742 mazuac Leviticus 11:20-23
20 " 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. 21 There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. 22 Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. 23 But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
I don't see anything contradictory here... O: Levitcus. I totally find that to be a credible source D: If i am correct those are not considered insect and are in a different Genus Your one to talk. >.< You made me find the verse for you! This was your argument to begin with...
Anyways, the Binomial Nomenclature classifying system, and the Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Genus, Species hadn't been established yet. (imagine that).
Therefore, they were considered insects. Well if the bible is so rich with scientific fact then it should know that they are not insects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:25 pm
Isaac742 mazuac Isaac742 mazuac Leviticus 11:20-23
20 " 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. 21 There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. 22 Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. 23 But all other winged creatures that have four legs you are to detest.
I don't see anything contradictory here... O: Levitcus. I totally find that to be a credible source D: If i am correct those are not considered insect and are in a different Genus Your one to talk. >.< You made me find the verse for you! This was your argument to begin with...
Anyways, the Binomial Nomenclature classifying system, and the Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Genus, Species hadn't been established yet. (imagine that).
Therefore, they were considered insects. Well if the bible is so rich with scientific fact then it should know that they are not insects Um, HELLO!?
Do you not realize God doesn't go by human standards? We classify organisms differently than God may. Lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
