|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow tje stalker Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:24 pm
Classicals are movie vampires. You know, the ones that you think about when you hear the word Vampire.
Inheritors are humans that were turned into vampires. Though I don't believe in them because Classicals are fake vampires and are apparently the only ones who can create inheritors. i also believe that Inheritors are fake considering that the only person here that may even have some sort of a life span over 350 years (perhaps not that long) would be Serris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:25 pm
Shadow tje stalker Classicals are movie vampires. You know, the ones that you think about when you hear the word Vampire. Inheritors are humans that were turned into vampires. Though I don't believe in them because Classicals are fake vampires and are apparently the only ones who can create inheritors. i also believe that Inheritors are fake considering that the only person here that may even have some sort of a life span over 350 years (perhaps not that long) would be Serris. Serris thats considering your past-life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow tje stalker Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:39 pm
How are inheriors turned when the clue is in the name.. (you know.. Inherits..) The belief is that inheritors inherited a dormant gene or retrovirus or some wacky s**t from an ancestor (which could skip generations (hence why the parents aren't vampires, but the child is) I personally know 4..
CLASSICALS are the ones who got turned, called classical because in the movies they are typically turned. So that's where the image of classical came because that the classic image of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:44 pm
Inheritors, inherit their vampirism from one or both of their parents. They may be able to turn people, but it's not definitive.
Classicals or Ageless, are more like the movie type vampires. They are turned, and age extremly slow. Hence the name ageless. They are able to turn people by infection of an std/aids like retro viruse (or something like that.) Their lifespan is not completely known, but they do have one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow tje stalker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:30 pm
If what you have just said is true then ALL vampires are inheritors. Porphyria could be one explanation for vampires that aren't inheritors. But classicals are fake. Otherwise they are Sangs. Except for the fact they they can't turn into bats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:45 pm
This is all very interesting...but now I am confused. Shadow, I knew you were talking about my pastlife. so how do you know that classicals are fake? Just because you have never met a classical, or have never seen someone turned does not me they don't exist and that people are never turned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Zimmerchild Inheritors, inherit their vampirism from one or both of their parents. They may be able to turn people, but it's not definitive. Classicals or Ageless, are more like the movie type vampires. They are turned, and age extremly slow. Hence the name ageless. They are able to turn people by infection of an std/aids like retro viruse (or something like that.) Their lifespan is not completely known, but they do have one. this. and miiz mentioned something about me either being an inheritor or someone with a more advanced stage of vampirism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:59 pm
Shadow tje stalker If what you have just said is true then ALL vampires are inheritors. Porphyria could be one explanation for vampires that aren't inheritors. But classicals are fake. Otherwise they are Sangs. Except for the fact they they can't turn into bats. That isn't the only defining characteristic for an inheritor. And nothing, inheritor classical or normal, can turn into a bat..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow tje stalker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:41 pm
I know that nothing can turn into a bat but until I see book proof of classicals and inheritors I'm not buyin it. I know we are supposed to have an open mind but this is discerning to me. Serris being a feline type demon is believable after easy accessable information but not being able to find anything about classicals or inheritors caught me off guard. I'm not gonna buy it but I will take your word for it. I will believe in them until shown otherwise. This thread will be locked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:50 pm
that is fine, I was just stating an opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:07 pm
Shadow tje stalker If what you have just said is true then ALL vampires are inheritors. Porphyria could be one explanation for vampires that aren't inheritors. But classicals are fake. Otherwise they are Sangs. Except for the fact they they can't turn into bats.
No they are not, there is a slight difference..Inheritors are only Sang, just like Classicals or Ageless. They have a longer lifespan than an LHV, and age slower then we do. They are not the same as us, because, as I also said, they may be able to turn. LHV's may be a retardation of Inheritor vampires, however.
Claiming Classicals as fake, is your opinion and not fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:09 pm
fashion zombie harlot Zimmerchild Inheritors, inherit their vampirism from one or both of their parents. They may be able to turn people, but it's not definitive. Classicals or Ageless, are more like the movie type vampires. They are turned, and age extremly slow. Hence the name ageless. They are able to turn people by infection of an std/aids like retro viruse (or something like that.) Their lifespan is not completely known, but they do have one. this. and miiz mentioned something about me either being an inheritor or someone with a more advanced stage of vampirism
Yep, I'm like that as well. It's unlikely that I'm an Inheritor though, if I am, it definetly is a well kept family secret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:13 pm
Shadow tje stalker I know that nothing can turn into a bat but until I see book proof of classicals and inheritors I'm not buyin it. I know we are supposed to have an open mind but this is discerning to me. Serris being a feline type demon is believable after easy accessable information but not being able to find anything about classicals or inheritors caught me off guard. I'm not gonna buy it but I will take your word for it. I will believe in them until shown otherwise. This thread will be locked.
I did provide you with information. *sigh* But have it as you will, however, I feel it is awfully childish to lock the thread simply because you don't want/can't/whatever understand about Inheritors and Classicals/Ageless. I'm surprised you believe in vampires at all since it's rather hard to find good sources of information on LHV's and most of it (if any) isn't written by a scientist or doctor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:48 pm
Your going to lock a thread because everyone else disagrees?
Yeah... That's kinda stupid..
And I also see how people can believe in one type of vampire, yet can't believe in an offshoot unless there's "book proof" (case you didn't notice, there's no book proof for anything.. Seeing as there is no real scientific tests available we can't prove vampirism) so how the hell are there supposed to be a book on inheritors? The world isn't simple or straight forward, I've kind of learned that now. And after seeing some odd s**t that really made no sense, I've kind of accepted that there is wayyy more to life than you can see or read in a book..
Just because you havnt seen proof doesn't mean it can't be real.
Think of it like Bigfoot, I've never seen one, there's no proof of them, but I don't doubt that there could be something out there. Same as aliens (sorry but anyone that seriously believes that we are the ONLY intellgent life in the universe is just being naive (Sorry I can't spell it's early morning)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
