|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 8:26 pm
What do you think of 28 days later? I really like it. Do you agree with me that it would suck to have a infection to spread in 20-30 seconds. Especially with if you even get blood in your mouth or in your eye you will become a zombie. So what do you think of the movie?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 3:07 pm
That movie creeped me out. I still liked it, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 4:43 pm
I would hate to be in a invasion like that with all of the zombies moving that fast and the virus spreading so fast... To be honest I would have been killed in a week or so (I'm not a fast runner That would have been my down fall)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 4:53 pm
To be honest I think the zombies in this movie were worse then normal undead.These ones can spew blood all over making it more likely to be infected......and of course they're fast.And even though there alive and easier to kill then undead,if theres to many for you to shoot it won't matter
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T-bird forgotten angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 4:39 pm
yeah I have not seen the full movie. those zombies are scary and it would suck if an outbreak like that ever occurred. but yeah I liked the movie so far
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 5:05 pm
I kinda like 28 weeks later better cause the show the zombies more
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:34 pm
it was pretty good i was little when i saw it so i got nightmares
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:10 pm
Leif00 I kinda like 28 weeks later better cause the show the zombies more i saw some of 28 weeks later to be honest i prefer 28 days later better movie in general. 28 weeks later was scary in the beginning then it lost it for me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:46 am
dragons_eat_people Leif00 I kinda like 28 weeks later better cause the show the zombies more i saw some of 28 weeks later to be honest i prefer 28 days later better movie in general. 28 weeks later was scary in the beginning then it lost it for me. True,28 days later sticks to the more classic zombie movie genre,focusing on a group of people trying to survive,but I still wish it would've showed more zombies
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:35 am
my friends say 28 weeks wasnt worth it so i havent seen it yet
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:29 pm
well 28 days was about post and 28 weeks shows an outbreck from the time before it starts all the way up to post. i like 28 weeks better in some ways and 28 days for some reasons.
i apsolutly like the 28 weeks later tralor.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:09 am
just got the movie band new for $4 but i think the movie takes too long too get to the point and not that mush zombie action in it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:16 am
will-alchemy-master just got the movie band new for $4 but i think the movie takes too long too get to the point and not that mush zombie action in it you went to walmart didnt you?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:27 am
semburu254 will-alchemy-master just got the movie band new for $4 but i think the movie takes too long too get to the point and not that mush zombie action in it you went to walmart didnt you? yep 4laugh
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:56 pm
will-alchemy-master semburu254 will-alchemy-master just got the movie band new for $4 but i think the movie takes too long too get to the point and not that mush zombie action in it you went to walmart didnt you? yep 4laugh now they just need to put 28 weeks there for $4
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|