|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:57 pm
I'm not sure it is "artistic" per se, but I'm posting the giant tadpoles of doom that I found today. 
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:32 pm
Neat, smile You had me at "Doom Frogs"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:52 am
Tadpoles! surprised
They're awesome at that size.
Random: A couple years ago I was very bored at the start of summer and spent time wading through our pond, catching them by hand. It was trickier than I thought it'd be. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:10 am
Yeah, this picture doesn't show how big they really are. I was standing 10 feet away from the pond when I took this. I would say they are a good 5-6 inches long. They are ginormous! I have never seen tadpoles this big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:10 pm
I love this first one, because it looks like the picture is upside down (which it isn't) and the branches kind of fit in the middle like puzzle pieces.  I call this one Shy Innocence.  I like this statue, and wish I had one of my own... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:43 am
Evil- AMAZING, Amazing Picture of the branches. I love it because I feel like I am craning my neck to look up at the tree above me as I view this picture from my seat. The second is wonderful too-I enjoy how the rose plays "peek-a-boo", great light/shadows, great color.
The third is rough because I see we have the EXACT same problem with our respective cameras. You seem to suffer as I do from the blur syndrome- you love the natural light but your camera is lousy when it comes to shutter speeds and capturing "low"-light shots. Does your camera have an adjustable shutter speed? Mine doesn't (lousy point and shoots). It's a good shot otherwise but I can tell what you mean about your camera.
You have a wonderful eye, but you do desire an upgrade in equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:19 am
Nope, I have just the basic point and click too. I took a lot more pictures, but most of them were craptastic due to blurriness. I'd love to buy a "real" camera someday, but that costs monies, and I'm not sure how much of a real hobby it would be. Real cameras seem a lot more difficult to lug around...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:19 pm
Evil Eirlys Nope, I have just the basic point and click too. I took a lot more pictures, but most of them were craptastic due to blurriness. I'd love to buy a "real" camera someday, but that costs monies, and I'm not sure how much of a real hobby it would be. Real cameras seem a lot more difficult to lug around...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
