|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkKingJaden Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:59 pm
Ok so not technically paranormal but possibly supernatrual but this case has intrested me for some time and it to date is unsolved so lets start back at the beggining shall we?
London england the year is 1988 it's late in the year there is a speit of murders has got the the police force baffled, the victims are known prostitutes the killer was nick named jack the ripper, he was belived to posses super natrual powers because nobody saw not even his victims until it was to late. the way he killed them, slit there throat instantly killing them, the way they was killed led the investigtion squad of the case was led to belive that the killer had some surgical knowledge.
The reason this case intrests me is because the many theories regarding it have often been de-0bunked and the killings stopped some say this was because of the ripper dying.
I pose to you the Gaia Paranomral guild what if this psychotic killer found away to live forever, what if he was not human for example the killings stopped in england but started in other coutnries with people being arrested for them, what if they was wrongly accused?
What if Jack the ripper still exsists, but the governments of the world know this and use him to kill people who get to close to certain truths?
Ok so thats not my theopry but it's one of the ones not de-bunked, but my theory is this yes the rip[per still exsist his killing methods have changed with the ages but he still exsists, what if the name Jack the ripper is the name given down through the generations to those who will kill.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:43 am
Jack the ripper is starting to sound a lot like the ' reaper '
The one who symbols a skull for death and such. .__. I'm not so sure about the whole mystery buisness you got going there, but it sounds possible to me. n__n
But to my concern is it really possible that he could live forever? If he was a ghost or perhaps a spirit.. can he/she touch? .__. I'm guessing theres such a group who believes in him/ have such high beliefs in him that they would follow his footsteps.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:01 am
The Whitechapel murders (as they are known formally) did NOT happen in the 1900s. It happened in 1888. Now my argument for the Jack the Ripper murders were that they were done by a Canadian-born doctor who was in England at the time. This doctor, named Cream, was sentenced to hang in Canada but on the gallows, his final words were: "I am Jack the..." At that point, the hangman threw the lever and Dr. Cream was hung.
This is very much so controversial in my opinion, but I do believe that he DID have some connection with the Whitechapel murders, if not do the murders himself (Dr. Cream was also a murder of the vigilante kind). It was right around the time that Dr. Cream was hung that the Whitechapel murders ceased.
Other theories circulate on the infamous "Jack" being a priest or someone of the Anglican church who committed them for the sake of "purifying the country of vagrants and sinners who refuse to atone". One key fact that supports this is ALL of the victims were prostitutes. Prostitution in the Biblical sense is very much so a sin and a really bad one at that. The time period in which the murders were set was in a time of civil unrest and a time when the police were almost, if not always powerless to other people.
The supernatural aspect did not really come around until the 1970's to 1980's when the idea of supernaturalism was new. If Jack the Ripper was still with us today, my guess is he would of partaken in the Nazi regime of Hitler's Germany and other massacres around the world. His supernatural qualities would be only limited to living for eternity and nothing more.
Governments could not possibly keep evidence of knowing who the true killer is for so long because he would of been discovered by now if they did. Many criminal investigators dream of finally solving the Jack the Ripper case. But the problem is they never will because not enough evidence was found at the crime scenes to point back to a definite killer. There is also the argument of the criminological system of back then didn't know about fingerprinting and other identification methods. So the crime will never be solved.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:00 pm
Jack the Ripper was one of the first mysteries I'd ever known about. I'll be honest, I hadn't known about the supernatural aspect, but I do believe..wasn't there also a woman whom was supposedly Jack the Ripper. Here's what we, or at least I, know. 1. He leaves letters(one of which he had mentioned the vicitms blood was too thick to use as ink) 2. He kills prostitutes in the most hanus of ways. 3. He seemed to have done this things in England.
Here's what we, or at least I, am unsure of. 1. Why did he/she do it? The religious man belief is good but it's not the only belief about why. 2.How could he not get caught?! I know the police were pretty useless at the time, but with all the deaths accumulating, you'd think that eventually they'd do their job. 3. Did anyone even care if the prostitutes died or not? When you think about it long enough and connect it to the lazy police situation, people are biased towards illegal drug addicts and prostitutes. It's highly possible that no more evidence than neccessary was gained because no one simply cared what happened to those poor girls. It is, just a possibillity.
My own whacky theories as to why: 1. He could've had a mistress that turned out to be a prostitute and he became angry at them all. 2. He just went insane and for some reason pictured women as something else( I believe that this was a bad time period...it's highly possible that a large amount of women were prostitutes.) 3. This is the supernatural theory: He was forced to do it by something or someone. I don't know who or what would force him, but it's the best supernatural theory I could come up with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|