|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacred_Heart2064 Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:47 pm
okay okay, I have a way for the Royal Rumble now...I think...let's try this, now this is only a first time, hopefully we will get it better the next time
Basically we are going to randomly put people agaisnt each other cool?
The person who wins the fastest (post wise) will come out with a better number. Who is the loses in the fastest time will come out with the worst number, simple right? good. so lets recap for those who are too lame to read this
1) Random matches
2) fastest winner gets best time
3) fastest loser gets worst time
So If J.D. were to face Spawn (this is an example) and Spawn beat J.D. in 24 posts but Master X beat Taker in 21 posts then Master X automatically gets the best number and Taker gets the worst understand?
Also, I haven't been here for a while so I'm givving you until thursday to post on this thread to show if your active. IF YOU HAVE THE WWE, WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT, OR ECW CHAMPIONSHIP, YOU DON'T HAVE TO POST HERE BECAUSE YOU WON'T BE IN THE ROYAL RUMBLE. if you don't post here by thursday you won't be in the royal rumble.
P.S. On the poll don't vote yourself just cause it has your name, I actually want your opinion in who you think would be the best...i will take your answer into consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:51 am
Royal Rumble will be called off if we cant get 5 or more people
Time I want the 5, two weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:07 pm
You can add me to the list then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
