|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:43 pm
So, has anyone seen the new movie "Enchanted"? I went to see it last night, and it was funny and so cute! Personally, I think Disney did a very good job on this one. I won't say much, because I don't want to give anything away for people who haven't seen it yet. I loved the music, though, and have had "Ever Ever After" stuck in my head! And of course, Pip the talking chipmunk rocked. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:33 pm
Yet to see it, I want to though, alongside Beowulf and The Golden Compass.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:37 pm
FF_RedXIII Yet to see it, I want to though, alongside Beowulf and The Golden Compass. Beowulf was okay... I expected better though, yet the animation totally makes up for it. The Golden Compass was bearable. Though I can tell that if I had read the book I would have hated the film. As for Enchanted, it looked silly. But I have a small urge to see just how silly it is. I'll rent it when it comes out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:16 pm
I loved Enchanted! I saw it last week. It was adorable! :]
Gizelle cracked me up! She was so.... oblivious! Haha! But yet so cute at the same time. Her dresses ROCKED! (I would pay her to make me a dress.... LOL).
Pip was awesome of course.
Oh, oh! And did anyone realize that Nathaniel's voice was Timothy Spall??? I knew it the moment I heard it, and I hadn't even the slightest idea that he was supposed to be in the movie. So I was kind of waiting to see his character enter the "real world" through the manhole, just to make sure I was correct. LOL.
I want a Prince now.... Aww....
But that movie will teach little girls something. See, my generation, and even those before me, watched Disney Princess movies and always thought that they would marry the first "prince" [figire] that they met/were with. Enchanted teaches them otherwise! YAY!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:02 pm
littlepirate78 I loved Enchanted! I saw it last week. It was adorable! :]
Gizelle cracked me up! She was so.... oblivious! Haha! But yet so cute at the same time. Her dresses ROCKED! (I would pay her to make me a dress.... LOL).
Pip was awesome of course.
Oh, oh! And did anyone realize that Nathaniel's voice was Timothy Spall??? I knew it the moment I heard it, and I hadn't even the slightest idea that he was supposed to be in the movie. So I was kind of waiting to see his character enter the "real world" through the manhole, just to make sure I was correct. LOL.
I want a Prince now.... Aww....
But that movie will teach little girls something. See, my generation, and even those before me, watched Disney Princess movies and always thought that they would marry the first "prince" [figire] that they met/were with. Enchanted teaches them otherwise! YAY! Whoa... I haven't seen you around.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:13 pm
Nice to meet ya, Lady Pirate. Yeah, I knew right away that was Timothy Spall, too (yay being a 'Harry Potter' freak!) And Lady Pawn- yeah, it was silly, but that's what made it so cute in my opinion. smile You really think that 'Golden Compass' was only "bearable"? I had a few friends who thought it was great. (Just wondering why)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:55 pm
Kaida Haruko Yeah, I knew right away that was Timothy Spall, too (yay being a 'Harry Potter' freak!) I knew it was him too. xD I loved the movie. heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:34 pm
 I haven't seen it yet, but I'm so excited for it! It's going to be awesome... and I can't wait to see The Golden Compass too, I've read the books and I hope the movies can live up to them
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:30 pm
slowtrain  I haven't seen it yet, but I'm so excited for it! It's going to be awesome... and I can't wait to see The Golden Compass too, I've read the books and I hope the movies can live up to themI'll tell you right now... it doesn't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:58 pm
Kaida Haruko Nice to meet ya, Lady Pirate. Yeah, I knew right away that was Timothy Spall, too (yay being a 'Harry Potter' freak!) And Lady Pawn- yeah, it was silly, but that's what made it so cute in my opinion. smile You really think that 'Golden Compass' was only "bearable"? I had a few friends who thought it was great. (Just wondering why) Well, I'm biased when it's a movie made off of a book... because if it's a book I've read, I get all of my hopes up and start looking forward to certain scenes, and hoping that they capture what I was feeling when I read this part or that part... And when my hopes are dashed because the characters don't look how I imagined them, or they're missing scenes I deemed critical, or they have all the scenes but they seem crammed in there with no thought, emotion or point. It comes down to me believing that books and movies should be two different things and not cross over into eachother's worlds. Books are only entertaining because they actively use the imagination, they have cliffhanger chapters and little itty-bitty pieces of information that are so easily skimmed over when in a mad rush to get to the next page. They almost always come back and bite you in the @ss. And that's what I love about reading. For example, in the Harry Potter series... JK Rowling hides all of her juicy clues in the open and the only reason you don't go, "AHA! She's going to use that later... I just know it!" Is there's no dramatic music, no voice that drips 'this line is important'. So you miss it until the plot unravels and you get that 'Oh!'. The climax in books is soooooo much more invigorating then that in movies because as the protaganist pieces together all those missed bits of information, you do as well, since you missed them just like the main character did (unless the author made them alittle too obvious and your going, "No little bookman! Don't go into the dangerous trap you stupid little paperback fool!"). In a movie I'm always going, "No... don't do that, didn't you see this!? God that's so unrealistic..." because my imagination isn't giving it a chance because there's no real chance to give. And boy... I'm definately ranting. This is what happens when I get sick and cynical. I get bored and all essay-like on the population. To get to the point. I never read The Golden Compass, but it seems to me like it would have been a wonderful experience if I could have only imagined it and not watch it play out on screen wondering if it missed something here or didn't do the scene justice there. It was only bearable because it was pretty and I'm a fan of Nicole Kidman... I just hate squirming in my seat longing to read the book instead of staring at a wall. Sorry for the lenghty post and the 'in your face' opinion. You can completely disagree if you wish. Your entitled to your own opinion just as well as I am.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:51 pm
FlatteredPawn Kaida Haruko Nice to meet ya, Lady Pirate. Yeah, I knew right away that was Timothy Spall, too (yay being a 'Harry Potter' freak!) And Lady Pawn- yeah, it was silly, but that's what made it so cute in my opinion. smile You really think that 'Golden Compass' was only "bearable"? I had a few friends who thought it was great. (Just wondering why) Well, I'm biased when it's a movie made off of a book... because if it's a book I've read, I get all of my hopes up and start looking forward to certain scenes, and hoping that they capture what I was feeling when I read this part or that part... And when my hopes are dashed because the characters don't look how I imagined them, or they're missing scenes I deemed critical, or they have all the scenes but they seem crammed in there with no thought, emotion or point. It comes down to me believing that books and movies should be two different things and not cross over into eachother's worlds. Books are only entertaining because they actively use the imagination, they have cliffhanger chapters and little itty-bitty pieces of information that are so easily skimmed over when in a mad rush to get to the next page. They almost always come back and bite you in the @ss. And that's what I love about reading. For example, in the Harry Potter series... JK Rowling hides all of her juicy clues in the open and the only reason you don't go, "AHA! She's going to use that later... I just know it!" Is there's no dramatic music, no voice that drips 'this line is important'. So you miss it until the plot unravels and you get that 'Oh!'. The climax in books is soooooo much more invigorating then that in movies because as the protaganist pieces together all those missed bits of information, you do as well, since you missed them just like the main character did (unless the author made them alittle too obvious and your going, "No little bookman! Don't go into the dangerous trap you stupid little paperback fool!"). In a movie I'm always going, "No... don't do that, didn't you see this!? God that's so unrealistic..." because my imagination isn't giving it a chance because there's no real chance to give. And boy... I'm definately ranting. This is what happens when I get sick and cynical. I get bored and all essay-like on the population. To get to the point. I never read The Golden Compass, but it seems to me like it would have been a wonderful experience if I could have only imagined it and not watch it play out on screen wondering if it missed something here or didn't do the scene justice there. It was only bearable because it was pretty and I'm a fan of Nicole Kidman... I just hate squirming in my seat longing to read the book instead of staring at a wall. Sorry for the lenghty post and the 'in your face' opinion. You can completely disagree if you wish. Your entitled to your own opinion just as well as I am. Actually, I do agree. Movies based on books are never as good as the books themselves. They may be good, but nothing beats a well-written book in my opinion. I just try to look at movies and books as separate pieces, I guess. As for the Harry Potter movies- I dunno, I have no faith in those things anymore. Not that I don't still go to see them.
But yeah, I get what you're saying. Books are so much better than movies because they leave it up to you to imagine the world, but I still like to go see movies based on books that I've read. If they movie is good, well then that's a plus, but if they're bad, I find it very entertaining to bash them with my friends. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:57 pm
Lexell heart heart heart Prince Edward!
It's really amazing, James Marsden sings better than me and our friends hear and imagine with Hairspray!
(I'm a musicals freak too, sorry sweatdrop )
I love Pip too, how he acts like Giselle rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:21 pm
As my sister had said when we left the theatre, "It reminds us of why we loved the classic Disney movies so much growing up."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:30 pm
I saw Enchanted. It reminded me of the Disney classics, but by my standards it just didn't live up to them.
I could pretty much guess what the characters were going to say before they said it. Giselle and Edward were funny, but I still think they showed the funniest bits in the trailer.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|