| In favor |
| Meow |
|
42% |
[ 3 ] |
| no |
|
57% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:37 pm
I was just wondering if anyone would like to make a little informal rule with me.... well I was just thinking about how I don't call children "children" any more I call them spawn. So I was wondering if anyone would be opposed to making it so in this guild we can only refer to children or kids as spawn?
So all in favor?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:53 pm
Um... I dunno. I think people should be able to call them what ever they want. I personally prefer "little shitheads" but that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:25 pm
Meh, it's a bit limiting in terms of descriptive language. I say call 'em what you want, short of terms which are overly-positive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:41 am
If I'm in a good mood, they're brats.
If I'm in a bad mood, they're crotch-droppings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:32 pm
I call them: brats, crumbsnatchers, crotch-droppings
Also, the childfree comm on LJ once refered to them as "********" xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:43 pm
xd Wow never mind I like spawn but some of these other names are a lot better than spawn xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:07 pm
Angelic Celestia I call them: brats, crumbsnatchers, crotch-droppings Also, the childfree comm on LJ once refered to them as "********" xd I love that last one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:19 pm
Brandon Taylor Angelic Celestia I call them: brats, crumbsnatchers, crotch-droppings Also, the childfree comm on LJ once refered to them as "********" xd I love that last one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 1:27 pm
Yami Mirai Brandon Taylor Angelic Celestia I call them: brats, crumbsnatchers, crotch-droppings Also, the childfree comm on LJ once refered to them as "********" xd I love that last one. Yeah because what better way to parade around that you ******** and indavidual then to carry around their spawn xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:38 pm
Why not kids? I mean, they are rather goat-like in a sense. Chewing on everything 'n all.
No offense meant to goats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 11:04 pm
Yeah... Goats are more usefull, less annoying and easier to take care of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:58 pm
sybex Shark Why not kids? I mean, they are rather goat-like in a sense. Chewing on everything 'n all.
No offense meant to goats. Geez don't you think of the goats feelings.... stare .... poor goats..... even if you do have a very good point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:33 am
I've always thought of children as "sex-trophies."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:54 pm
Why don't we come up with some new words for breeders? Like '********'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:10 pm
XeeReiji sybex Shark Why not kids? I mean, they are rather goat-like in a sense. Chewing on everything 'n all.
No offense meant to goats. Geez don't you think of the goats feelings.... stare .... poor goats..... even if you do have a very good point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
