|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:51 pm
Rilian LOLE What would be the slippery slope? Unmarried people are already allowed to adopt. Good thing for me, cux I'm never getting married (cux I'm not religious and don't have any political or financial reasons to do so). Earlier, I was drawing an analogy between gay marriage (when a male marries a male or a females marries a female) gay adoption (when a male adopts a male or a female adopts a female-- right?) We should call it homosexual adoption. It will catch people off guard. Anyway, if one person can adopt, then any two people can, too. I wonder if 3 or 4 people could adopt. I know it's possible for a person to have 4 guardians. Tragic Mime was trying to use the argument that if we allow gay marriage, then we'll end up allowing beastiality too.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:54 pm
Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay. Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. You guys beat me to the punch. Yeah, fortunately gays haven't been stripped of all their rights yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:06 pm
Ah! Apologies. I misunderstood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:22 am
Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay.Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. See bolded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:23 am
Koravin Rilian LOLE What would be the slippery slope? Unmarried people are already allowed to adopt. Good thing for me, cux I'm never getting married (cux I'm not religious and don't have any political or financial reasons to do so). Earlier, I was drawing an analogy between gay marriage (when a male marries a male or a females marries a female) gay adoption (when a male adopts a male or a female adopts a female-- right?) We should call it homosexual adoption. It will catch people off guard. Anyway, if one person can adopt, then any two people can, too. I wonder if 3 or 4 people could adopt. I know it's possible for a person to have 4 guardians. Tragic Mime was trying to use the argument that if we allow gay marriage, then we'll end up allowing beastiality too. So if we allow those damn gays to adopt human children, next thing goats will be adopting human children? And what kind of role-model could a goat be!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:00 am
Rilian Koravin Rilian LOLE What would be the slippery slope? Unmarried people are already allowed to adopt. Good thing for me, cux I'm never getting married (cux I'm not religious and don't have any political or financial reasons to do so). Earlier, I was drawing an analogy between gay marriage (when a male marries a male or a females marries a female) gay adoption (when a male adopts a male or a female adopts a female-- right?) We should call it homosexual adoption. It will catch people off guard. Anyway, if one person can adopt, then any two people can, too. I wonder if 3 or 4 people could adopt. I know it's possible for a person to have 4 guardians. Tragic Mime was trying to use the argument that if we allow gay marriage, then we'll end up allowing beastiality too. So if we allow those damn gays to adopt human children, next thing goats will be adopting human children? And what kind of role-model could a goat be! LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:05 pm
Rilian Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay.Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. See bolded. And why are they not allowed rights that show they are gay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:42 pm
Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay.Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. See bolded. And why are they not allowed rights that show they are gay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:38 pm
Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay.Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. See bolded. And why are they not allowed rights that show they are gay? Because the US government sucks at this sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:06 am
Koravin Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Takeshi_Enkou Rilian Grott Marriage is one right. Opposed to their marriage doesn't mean you think they shouldn't have the right to Assembly or Attourney. Uhn.. "assembly" and "attourney" aren't gay rights. Gay rights are things like two people of the same sex marrying eachother and, well, all the benefits that come with that. Gay people do currently have the right to marry. They can marry someone of the opposite sex, just like anyone else. Gay people have rights to things that don't show that they are gay.Hmm...I was thinking that Gay people didn't have the rights to show their undying love towards their partner, or the right to visit said partner when they are dying or be part of their will. See bolded. And why are they not allowed rights that show they are gay? Because the US government sucks at this sort of thing. Agreed now discussion Dies bwahahaha!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:08 am
Is homosexuality of moral concern? Is it good or bad? (this isn't meant to be a loaded question. I'm not trying to say it's either.)
Is homosexuality natural? (in any sense of the word)
Should gay marriage be legalized? (mind you, I live in the states)
Should religion impact the gay debate?
Why are people homophobic?
Other related topics?
I'm just going to answer all of your questions...
No. Good. Depends on the person. Yes. No. Maybe the men/women around them are more attractive (physically and sexually) then the opposite gender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:40 pm
Rar, I want to revive this topic. Gay rights.
Gay marriage.
Gay adoption.
Don't ask don't tell.
Stuff like that.
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
