Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Smart punks
Punk Music? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Delik

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 2:01 pm


falsethreats
Delik
falsethreats
Delik
Probably, but maybe we'll get lucky and have a return of 80's style punk music so they can feel less isolated... But I think the music industry needs reform first.

No, the music industry will be the same consumer-wanting shithole. A whole new musical revolution that isn't punk is what needs to happen. Unforunately, I can't imagine what new and radical music anyone in this generation can create. -_-


Hmm... Psychotronic?

Okay. Lets do it NOW!


I totally agree, but how?
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:14 pm


Delik
falsethreats
Delik
falsethreats
Delik
Probably, but maybe we'll get lucky and have a return of 80's style punk music so they can feel less isolated... But I think the music industry needs reform first.

No, the music industry will be the same consumer-wanting shithole. A whole new musical revolution that isn't punk is what needs to happen. Unforunately, I can't imagine what new and radical music anyone in this generation can create. -_-


Hmm... Psychotronic?

Okay. Lets do it NOW!


I totally agree, but how?


It doesn't matter. Just grab a ******** guitar, and do it your way!

falsethreats


MegaTherion777

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:29 pm


PL3453_K1LL_M3
Liek, OMG! Blink 182 is teh kewlest and most punk band evar! *shoots self in face with pixi gun*

. . . but, enough joking. It's kinda sad to see how such bands like Blink 182 and Simple Plan are considered punk by our generation. Hardly anyone of our generation knows what real punk music is.

The Buzzcocks, The Ramons, The Dead Kennedys, Anti Flag, Black Flag, Misfits.

There are are more, I just can't think of anymore at the moment.

And I don't care what anyone says, but Green Day is not punk.


YESSSS!

everyone in my school calls greenday punk and i want to hit them all over the head with a bass guitar. same thing with blink and simple plan.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:17 pm


Elitism sucks. Punk music is without limits, guidelines, or rules.

falsethreats


Delik

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:53 pm


falsethreats
Elitism sucks. Punk music is without limits, guidelines, or rules.


No no, it has to have some guidelines. If it didn't Kevin Federline could be called punk.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:25 pm


falsethreats
Elitism sucks. Punk music is without limits, guidelines, or rules.


yah without limits...so ill play clean guitars, at super slow speed, with happy, bright vocals, and call myself seals and croft...or ill play 18 minute solos and call myself pink floyd. and that's punk. right.

obviously it needs some limits to be called punk. one of those limits is originality. when green day steals an entire riff from "molly's lips" and claims it as an original song - "jesus of suburbia" - thats not being original. that is not punk.

MegaTherion777


falsethreats

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:53 pm


MegaTherion777
falsethreats
Elitism sucks. Punk music is without limits, guidelines, or rules.


yah without limits...so ill play clean guitars, at super slow speed, with happy, bright vocals, and call myself seals and croft...or ill play 18 minute solos and call myself pink floyd. and that's punk. right.

obviously it needs some limits to be called punk. one of those limits is originality. when green day steals an entire riff from "molly's lips" and claims it as an original song - "jesus of suburbia" - thats not being original. that is not punk.

So I guess it's alright to say that the Bad Brains aren't punk because they pretty much copied off the "God Save the Queen" sound into their song "Redbone in the City".

What I'm trying to point out by saying "no limits or guidelines" is that punk music isn't about conformity. It has always spoken for doing things YOUR way, and ignoring what others have to say about it. What Steven Blush realized about the hardcore scene is that each scene had a different sound.

When it comes to the music genre, the ideals and beliefs that the bands uphold shouldn't matter. The guidelines that elitists put on the sound of the music is way too strict. If you ever listened to the Zero Boys, you'd notice that their song "Trying Harder" sounds much like the sounds of bands like Simple Plan. But, Zero Boys is considered a punk band.

So, if we stuck to our rules and guidelines for punk, Simple Plan probably would have been considered a punk band. First of all, their music is very simplistic (like much of punk music). Second, they use repeated power chords. And, third, their music is easy to play. When I was younger, I used to learn to play my guitar by copying bands such as Simple Plan, just like the members of the Middle Class when they learned to play through early punk rock records. So, who's to say Simple Plan can't be a punk band?

Ian Mackaye himself says that punk is "undefinable". If it's undefinable, how could it have rules or guidelines?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:26 pm


as you said, doing thing your way.

liking a sound on a song and then trying to imitate that by using the same guitars, amps, effects, etc isnt stealing.

greenday took the ******** riff that the song was based on, and put different lyrics over it. that isnt "doing things your way," that's taking an idea from someone who was already doing things their own way, and passing it off as your own idea.

if they had covered "molly's lips" or put their own riff behind the lyrics, i wouldn't be bashing them. because i realize that just because i dont like a band doesnt mean they suck. but when a band cant write their own music so they steal riffs from other people, that is 1) not having any integrity whatsoever and 2) sucking. hard.

MegaTherion777


falsethreats

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:59 pm


MegaTherion777
as you said, doing thing your way.

liking a sound on a song and then trying to imitate that by using the same guitars, amps, effects, etc isnt stealing.

greenday took the ******** riff that the song was based on, and put different lyrics over it. that isnt "doing things your way," that's taking an idea from someone who was already doing things their own way, and passing it off as your own idea.

if they had covered "molly's lips" or put their own riff behind the lyrics, i wouldn't be bashing them. because i realize that just because i dont like a band doesnt mean they suck. but when a band cant write their own music so they steal riffs from other people, that is 1) not having any integrity whatsoever and 2) sucking. hard.

Influences are one thing, but the Bad Brains imitated the riffs and beats of Sex Pistols' "God Save the Queen". I don't know what kind of guitar sounds they used, but that's of no importance and doesn't contribute to the point I'm making.

I advise you to pull your finger out of your a**, and stop getting so uptight about the "Molly's Lips" thing. Using that little bit of "Molly's Lips" in Green Day's "She's a Rebel" doesn't mean they're ripping Nirvana off. It shouldn't even be of any importance at all. If you listen to the Ramones' "Blitzkreig Bop", you'd notice that many punk bands have used similar riffs and beats as the song's main riff and beat, sometimes identical.

Recently, I wrote a song about pity-whores. I noticed that the melody and beats were slightly similar to that of Beastie Boys' "Deal With It" in their early hardcore punk album Aglio E Olio. Do I lack originality? Or are the Beastie Boys merely an influence to my song writing?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:56 am


as i said before - sounding similar is fine. copying is not. you sounding similar to that song is not the same as figuring out the riff and then placing it in one of your own "original" pieces. greenday could have changed the time signature, could have palm muted it, could have added a rest or a chord (or dropped a chord), could have changed the key, THEY COULD HAVE DONE A MILLION DIFFERENT THINGS TO ALTER THAT RIFF SLIGHTLY - and had they done so, i woud say that they sounded similar. but the fact is that they kept it the same when they had many ways they could have altered it slightly. that goes beyond being influenced by someone, that is thievery.

i can see your point with the "sounds like" stuff. but this isn't a case of "sounds like the riff," it's a case of "it is the riff."

MegaTherion777


falsethreats

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:20 pm


MegaTherion777
as i said before - sounding similar is fine. copying is not. you sounding similar to that song is not the same as figuring out the riff and then placing it in one of your own "original" pieces. greenday could have changed the time signature, could have palm muted it, could have added a rest or a chord (or dropped a chord), could have changed the key, THEY COULD HAVE DONE A MILLION DIFFERENT THINGS TO ALTER THAT RIFF SLIGHTLY - and had they done so, i woud say that they sounded similar. but the fact is that they kept it the same when they had many ways they could have altered it slightly. that goes beyond being influenced by someone, that is thievery.

i can see your point with the "sounds like" stuff. but this isn't a case of "sounds like the riff," it's a case of "it is the riff."


You are incorrect. I have downloaded and listened to both tracks, and although I've noticed their similarities, I've also noticed the bigger differences in each song. If you've listened to the entire "She's a Rebel" track, it's not the same 2-chord repetition as "Molly's Lips". "She's a Rebel" actually starts with the G-C chord repetition like "Molly's Lips". But, unlike "Molly's Lips", the riff moves on to play the D chord, then back to C, then back to the G-C chord repetition. Also, the chorus is entirely different. It's nothing like "Molly's Lips". Also, the melody of the vocals of both songs are similar but not exactly the same.

At this point, I've listened to "She's a Rebel" more times that I'd like to, and I've noticed that the riff sounds more like another song.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:01 pm


ah i see... we split the riffs up differently. what you are calling one riff, in my head i split up into two riffs. its hard getting into arguments like this unless you're here so i can show you exactly what i'm referring to by playing it on my guitar.

and you're right, probably i shouldnt be getting mad about them stealing a riff. but i was into metal way before punk, and in the metal community, stealing a riff is just about the lowest thing you can do. it is beneath contempt. so to me it is a bigger offense than it is to you.

and i'm a guitarist - i didn't really care about the vocal melodies. it was the riffs that bugged me. you were focusing on the whole song - i was just focusing on the guitar part.

MegaTherion777


falsethreats

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:42 pm


MegaTherion777
ah i see... we split the riffs up differently. what you are calling one riff, in my head i split up into two riffs. its hard getting into arguments like this unless you're here so i can show you exactly what i'm referring to by playing it on my guitar.

and you're right, probably i shouldnt be getting mad about them stealing a riff. but i was into metal way before punk, and in the metal community, stealing a riff is just about the lowest thing you can do. it is beneath contempt. so to me it is a bigger offense than it is to you.

and i'm a guitarist - i didn't really care about the vocal melodies. it was the riffs that bugged me. you were focusing on the whole song - i was just focusing on the guitar part.


Oo no, I understand what point you're trying to make. You don't have to show it to me. I understand what riffs have been copied. However, even for someone who's into metal, such a small thing like that little riff shouldn't be taken as seriously as you took it. It's only a 2-chord riff after all. XD

Because the "stolen" riff is such a small riff, one would question whether Green Day had purposefully copied the riff or if the whole thing was merely coincidence. Regardless of that, it's too small of a matter to even bother getting angry about.

If you're a songwriter like me, you'll find that sometimes your riffs sound like other known riffs. For example, I copied off a riff from an Aus-Rotten song, beat for beat, note for note. My reason for using the riff was because it fit so well with the rest of the song.

By coincidence, I found this song by Oi Polloi that had the exact same riff as one of my original riffs. I thought it was pretty bitchin'. XDDDD
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:41 pm


I had to research a court case once where a guitarist was accused of copyright infringement of a group of singers. I'm affraid he ended up losing, but the Judge conceeded that it could have been a total accident. The problem is, as more music, or anything for that matter comes out, it becomes increasingly difficult to be 100% original.

Delik


MegaTherion777

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:04 pm


Delik
I had to research a court case once where a guitarist was accused of copyright infringement of a group of singers. I'm affraid he ended up losing, but the Judge conceeded that it could have been a total accident. The problem is, as more music, or anything for that matter comes out, it becomes increasingly difficult to be 100% original.


yeah, especially since we're all confined to the same 7 tones...
Reply
Smart punks

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
//
//

// //

Have an account? Login Now!

//
//