|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:03 pm
you choose Kal; im sure hodge wouldn't mind.
yeah, get ryoku and tarren in there. but don't make their big debut until phase three, along with audrina. maybe in phase three, kairynn can come back (she'd have too since she's workin with audrina) and maybe have her somewhat meet the two guys....iunno....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:00 pm
Wouldn't it be funny if Kairynn was about of the plan the whole time since she works for Audrina
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:11 pm
Well, we need to make Kairynn feel... betrayed. She doesn't like fighting, and here's Audrina trying to start another war.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:21 pm
that would be funny, but i agree with kal. we need kairynn (no offense angel) to be torn between alliances. it makes it all interesting. and it leaves the audience thinking at the time "what side is she on?" heh...something like that. kal's idea for kairynn's good.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:34 pm
that okay. i think it makes sense to me, lito and Kali =3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:17 pm
so then....will audrina know ryoku and tarren personally too? she already knows daniel, cuz she sends him on the mission, and of course she knows kairynn but i don't think she'll meet them till final confrontation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:30 pm
No, Audrina shouldn't know about Ryoku and Tarren. She will try and track Daniel, but after Daniel finds out about Ciel he's going to get a little confused about what he believes in, obviously.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:29 pm
so with daniel, he'll feel torn between his mission and ciel. and with kairynn, she feel betrayed by audrina. that should make up for the absense of deaths. simply more heartache and drama =) it is a good bonding time when things look down...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:26 pm
i guess so ^^"
we still have to decide on a few things though:
warships relationships how we are spreading everything out
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:10 pm
Yesh, the themes of betrayal and decision really make everything more dramatic and have great impact. lol. This is making me think of some movie commercial...
"The boundaries between love and betrayal... allies and enemies... imagination and reality... will blend... Things will never be the same again... Project Eternity..."
lol. Anyways, I agree with angel that we should decide on a few things, especially on warships and the like.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:14 pm
I have an idea for a warship name... Cerberus is the guardian of the underworld in Greek mythology. Does that work?
And we still need someone to play Richard Henderson (lol, I said Richardson last time, didn't I).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 8:13 pm
Yes, Cerberus could work very well. At the moment, I'm learning about Greek mythology. There's four winds: Boreas, Zephyr, Eurus, and Notus. But the names are a bit iffy to me... xp Peacemaker and Brisingr are just some random ones. There's Ulysses, Daedulus, Charon (boatsman of river Styx), and a lot more I can't remember right now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:09 am
the boatsman names would work for minor earthships in the OR...if that is the line of thinking we are all on XD
i like the idea of the cerberus. but who's gonna use it, and will it be a space or earth designated warship?
lol, i think someone else said richardson too...heh....s'okay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:26 am
Yes, start one trend Kali, then we all follow it.
Uhm...aside from warships and such...
Does anyone have any idea where we're supposed to end the first phase? I mean, Cagalli has already gotten shot at. We're kind of dragging it on...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:32 am
I commented on that in the other post. I think we should end it off after hodge's post.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|