Welcome to Gaia! ::

Right. Ash's Pikachu, Pika and ChuChu all have flat tails, despite Pika being canonly male and ChuChu being canonly female. They were all made before the gender differences were established.

PIKACHU: THE GREAT GENDER DEBATE!
Bum, bum, bum, da, dum!

Pikachu’s gender is actually unconfirmed. It’s voice actress Ikue Ootani, and Satoshi Tajiri said that they have not yet decided it’s gender. Therefore meaning there’s a possibility of it being a female. If you believe Pikachu has no chance of being female because of the keywords: always acted masculine, Buneary, and tail, I advise you to read the following.

1. Oh goodness. Not THIS again. I’m gonna say this once and for all: Pikachu is 100% MALE. HE has never acted feminine…ever.


-Here are some “very interesting” frames of Pikachu dancing with a Raichu--> Ironically enough, some of this scene was in the Pikachu (I Choose You) video.

“ Pikachu!
You know there is no other...
I choose you!
Because you are my brother...”
Yup, doesn’t get any brotherly that this.

-Watch carefully at 00:50-00:55 (WARNING: this song is VERY addictive)-->
--In the old episodes, Pikachu had more of a motherly/sisterly relationship with Togepi than a fatherly/brotherly. The same with other young Pokemon like the Pichu Bros. and Hapinny

If Pikachu had no possibility being a girl, why would they bother to give it female roles?

2. Pikachu isn’t a girl because it doesn’t have an indent on its tail
Please…STOP USING THIS TO BACK UP PIKACHU BEING MALE! Pikachu is from the KANTO region. Not SINNOH. :/ Those differences don’t apply to the previous regions. Even if Pikachu was male, it wouldn’t be because of its tail, it would be because Pikachu’s design was based of the original design of the species.

>> PROOF THAT GENDER DEFERANCES DON’T COUNT FOR POKEMON FROM GENERATIONS I, II, AND III<<
The proof for my statement is in Ash’s Aipom. Aipom has been confirmed a girl; and it’s not because she wore a dress in “Steamboat Willies!”. (Clothing doesn’t always determine gender--) It’s because it was verbally stated by May and Dawn in the Japanese version. May said “Aipom is a girl after all, isn't she?” and Dawn said Aipom was a girl who liked contests. According to DP, male Aipoms have short cowlicks--
Aipom has a short cowlick--

Like Pikachu, her design was also based of the original design for her species. If the differences really did count, she would have been a boy.

3. Dawn’s Buneary has a crush on Pikachu and Dawn has even confirmed it to being a girl. So that means Pikachu’s a guy.
Actually, Buneary’s gender is unconfirmed as well. Buneary has a possibility of being male no matter how girly it may act. As long as its gender isn’t confirmed it’s still possible. For all we know, boy Bunearys could be in the same catagory as male Jigglypuffs, Wigglytuffs, Bellossoms, and Clefairys: girly-acting regardless of their true gender. This also goes for other manly looking Pokemon who can be female: masculine-acting regardless of their true genders. There are female Machokes but we wouldn’t be able to tell them from the males. They all act and look exactly the same.

Despite the fact that Buneary’s gender isn’t confirmed, for some reason they dub has confirmed it as a female.

(In “Steamboat Willies!” )
Dawn: Aipom! Buneary! You girls look so cute!

Or something like that…(why couldn’t she have said “you two”!? it would have worked just as well. >_< )

When Ikue Ootani said Pikachu’s gender was undecided, she said that in 2006, the year DP came out in Japan. It wouldn't make sense to confirm Buneary's gender and not confirm Pikachu's…

In Conclusion
There’s nothing wrong about thinking Pikachu’s a boy and Buneary’s a girl (That’s your personally opinion) I’m just saying it’s not right to bash other for thinking the opposite since it’s not canon. *There is no actually proof for them being either gender. The only proof we have is the possibility of them being whichever. For Pikachu, we have male AND female hints.* Unless their genders are officially announced or verbally stated in the original version like Aipom, we can say that they are those genders for sure.

Case closed

~Kirbtaro05

----
She had some good points, but now it's be confirmed in one of the recent episodes when a female togepi used attract on all the male Pokemon including Pikachu. I always had mixed feelings of Pikachu being either a boy or a girl. I was the one who would just call it "it" like they usually do.

I'm pretty sure female pokemon have used "attract" on Pikachu more than once. It's pretty heavily implied.

Boy. owo

Yeah, but we don't know what gender Pikachu is fighting against in battles, they don't write at the top "girl" "boy." So now since everyone knew the Togepi they were dealing with was a girl, it's much easier to determine exactly Pikachu's gender. But anyway...

An 'it' ?!?!
Dude, all Pokemon [except legendaries & others of course] have genders. =/

I agree with you 100%.