|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:12 am
house of night is better
my reason of theory for it being better would have to be the fangirls of "edward" got's to stop and people started reading because it became a movie(which will probably happen to HoN)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:52 am
I couldn't choose between the two.
HoN has a lot of action.
Twilight has a lot of romance,
There are Downsides of both.
HoN books seemed boring to me because for like the first three books were all about Health, and Health isn't my favorite character, he is the type of boy i just hate.
Twilight had too much obbession, Edward obessed with bella and vice versa, get is annoy and too repetive.
They both have their own creative sides to a vampire.
HoN they have powers a witch would have.
Twilight= Some have a speical ablilty like superheros
Though there is no such thing as an orginal vampire in the fantasy world.
thought to those who think the "orginal vampire" sucks blood, can't be in sunlight and can't stand garlic.
Both books share a trait of the "orginal vampire"
HoN; they need to drink blood to stay healthy
Twilight; they can't be in the sun, so when exposed they sparkle
And i though we were talking about the books not the twilight movie?!
Though I'd choose Vampire Academy over both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
metrocitylights Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
