|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:25 pm
Experiences and relations are not a good excuse for a democratic society. It is almost considered: Hereditary Monarchy.
If we are going to stick to that, PAP is going to be the leader for the rest of time. Then whats the point of having a democractic society?
If I have the choice, I did say, keep the opposition coming in, but the party must realise that it is not an internal competition of power, but a selection for the best to bring the best out of the nation.
Therefore, should any party gains victory of the elections, they should not be despise, and accepted and taught by the former governance to prosper Singapore. Which I think will be the case when oppositions do start winning.
Parties need to start working together instead of against each other. I also think that the current government should neven be connected to any parties after they take up positions in the governing bodies. Instead they should challenge everyone even their own maternal party at every new elections. But then, who am I to talk about politics?
God I felt that whatever I just typed is so sensitive. I have nothing against anyone in the governing bodies of Singapore. Just sometimes, during elections, things can get abit dramatic. =?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:11 am
SilvernKnight If we are going to stick to that, PAP is going to be the leader for the rest of time. Then whats the point of having a democractic society? This. There's nothing inherently wrong with having a dictatorship. As long as its a good government and the people are happy. Other countries had and still have monarchies where the rulers are good and the population is happy. Elections are extremely expensive to run and consider all the tension they cause plus a whole lot of needless drama. Maybe the PAP should just get rid of something that is essentially a sham and use the money somewhere else.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:07 am
I didn't think of it that way before Fezzy. Then but what do you do with the current "opposition leaders" ? I am sure they have a purpose and the PAP finds them useful. What is a possibility? Small number of public voting spots for non PAP people specifically? Just like role of president in "lower level"? Actually my politics is really horrible... NMPs... for example are they aligned with PAP huh? redface redface
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:51 am
I never understood the point of opposition members in parliament. In terms of voting in parliament, the opposition's 2 seats compared to the 84 seats the PAP has is meaningless. They can't vote against anything the PAP wants to pass or block it or do anything opposition parties in other governments do (fillibusters, no confidence, etc). From the PAP's point of view the purpose of the opposition is just so they can say Singapore has a functioning democracy with an active opposition.
I wonder why people in the opposition towns keep voting for opposition members. I think that opposition towns like potong pasir have been greatly underfunded, though this has been changing recently. I'd really like to talk to the people who vote for the opposition and ask them why they do it.
The point of an opposition in a functioning democracy is to act as a check and balance system. If the people aren't happy with their government's performance they can give more power to the opposition. As a newcomer to Singapore during the 2006 elections I found it funny that the government was having an election, where a large majority of the seats weren't even being contested. And then the leader of the opposition was jailled a few weeks before the election and released a few weeks after. I don't know how many of you keep track of international events, but the recent presidential election in Zimbabwe followed the same script with just much more violence.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:27 pm
I'm a permenant resident here. from malaysia, and i find singapore um..... boring. i agree
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:34 am
sch is betta dan anything but nt gaia
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:37 pm
I love it in Singapore heart at least because it's small I can go anywhere quite easily xD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Lily-livered Flip-Flopper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:29 pm
er btw singapore is nice = w = n.. im not sick of sg im sick of secondary school
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:11 am
Hikaridranz I love it in Singapore heart at least because it's small I can go anywhere quite easily xD yeah that ish teh point and we won get lost in teh jungle -.- like amazon rainforest...die of water i tell u
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:52 pm
wow young generations of singaporeans show their patriotism...... blaugh if i migrate frm singapore i dun get to eat NASI LEMAK frm Cheong Pang!! gonk crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:07 am
Wow, i guess i'm the only one who is most determined to migrate from here. But then again probably also because I've already lived overseas (still in asia, but international schools in two other countries) for ~70% of my life. Trust me, theres a lot more out there than here. Granted its safer here, but how to learn when you're kept in a box? What is there to experience right? Anyway, I still come back every CNY or summer holiday to visit family, but in my opinion, singapore is a great place to come back to, but not really stay. Agreed that its boring, you've seen one shopping mall, they're all the same. Nothing much else compared to where i've been. Due to some personal reasons, i'm stuck here (hopefully) until early 2011. Until then i'll pig out happily here :} but otherwise, i cant wait to go back..
PS: no offense to singapore or anyone out there with opposing opinions. I'm just stating my own.
@PinkSupervisor: cheong pang nasi lemak = <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:10 am
Actually I think there's nothing to complain about Singapore's ruling party being in power for so long. It's not like there isn't the democratic framework in Singapore it's just that we choose to keep them in power. It's a faustian bargain, we give up some of our liberties and keep them in power and they give us the best economic progress they can. At least that's how I see it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:06 am
Nothing to complain on the ruling party, i think they're doing a swell job biggrin -thumbs up and kudos- but i suppose its the social part of singapore where you cant say "good afternoon" or "hi" to a random stranger on the street (just even a polite greeting) without them either waving you off "NONONO, not interested" or etc. ): pft. maybe i'm just petty razz
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:04 am
cypherZTO Actually I think there's nothing to complain about Singapore's ruling party being in power for so long. It's not like there isn't the democratic framework in Singapore it's just that we choose to keep them in power. It's a faustian bargain, we give up some of our liberties and keep them in power and they give us the best economic progress they can. At least that's how I see it. they give us the "best economic progress" limited to the "best people of singapore" whereas others are just torn apart in the income gap and struggling to survive with our high standard of living. srs.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|