Welcome to Gaia! ::

An innveitabilty that can be seen from history. The change from slave societies to feudalism occured with destruction of Rome, the Feudal kings were overthown by various national revolution preaching of life, liberty, and property. It proably won't be the highlight of human history but if we want to progress as a society I do not see any other viable option that doesn't involve some violent actions. Though the revolution will proably be more defensive than offensive in nature. Such as communist forces gaining power in the national governemnt and the capitalists organizing a coup, or a huge strike occurs and the capitalists declare marshall law, something like that.

No if we make gaining power in a government dominated by the Bourgeoisie class we'll have to compromise our ideals to make headway and become little more than political prostitutes.

It's main duties will be to spread our ideas and inform the masses, as well as organizing the masses in an efficent manner acting as a sort of central hub in communicating with working class orginazations.

It's main duty will be to call upon the revolution and create a revolutionary government to make sure the new national goverment doesn't become deformed due to revisionists in the ranks.

I'm not extremely comfortable with it but I do see the need to make sure people aren't running around shooting at things. There needs to be waiting periods, restrictions on types of ammunitions and types of guns, as well as licenses and permits.

I think there brutish weapons and would like to see full disarmanent. However, I have the hypocracy of the world powers tell smallers nations that they are not allowed to have them when they themselves own enough to glass a continent or two. So I'm guessing nothing substantial will be done until after the revolution.

Maoists are better than Theocrats, nuff said.

Really there is no war but the class war.

1. It's essential for a successful revolution.

2. Revolution.

3. The party needs to attract and organise people, and act as a central command for the troops come revolution.

4. Ideological headquarters. It'd be like the Red Army high command in a way.

5. Makes the revolutionaries have to turn to the black market to get the necessary equipment.

6. They're an abomination and ruined war as we knew it.

7. Tibet's better off under the Chinese than under the slavemaster and monster the Dalai Lama.

8. It's the basis of the revolution. It gives the workers a specific basis for struggle against the enemies of the revolution.

The Party is one of the most vital roles of a proletarian revolution. The proletariat lack alone the radicalism that is required to form a powerful revolutionary force. The modern day party mainly its vanguard holds the duties of clearing the social biases of Marxism, defending it's revered name from political opponents,and to advance its concepts,via articles leaflets and a website. They must further, educate the proletariat, while also making sure it does not alienate itself from the working class. Once the enormous tasks of winning the majority of the workers support the party must then-in order to full oppose the ruling class- serve as the leading operator the revolution by acquiring arms for the proletariat, continue the distribution of articles and leaflets, and to serve as the military command hub designed to teach guerrilla warfare, and street warfare tactics. Since it is here where the party begins working outside the law it must preform its tasks carefully...





In certain stages of development in the means of production, classes emerge! With classes also emerges the struggle for one class to dominate the other. In today's epoch it is the Proletariat who seek to protect their Wages via Strikes and Unions. The capitalists want to cut wages in order to gain maximum surplus-value from the commodities they sell, in addition, they want to maintain their rule over the working class. It is our job to make fellow members of the working class aware of the historical necessity for us to overturn their system so that classes need not exist

Comrade Rob and Louis-Auguste Robespierre, thanks for the information/links! I've added the links in to my ever growing list of stuff to read.

The thing is, those that support the Party are likely to join it (I am talking prior to the revolution). What I seem to be getting is this fear that the party will become Stalinist once in power, but little appreciation for the situation that allowed it. It seems you suggest that the party purposefully reject people so that after the revolution there are people outside it to 'keep it honest' thus weakening the party during the revolution.

If I'm wrong, please clarrify.

Well there are two spheres to a party. The Proletariat and the Vanguard. The vanguard is made up of the most dedicated and politically advanced proletarians. The actions of the proletarians in the party are just as important as those in the vanguard. The vanguard is there to assure the continuance of the party really. I don't propose but actually loath the idea of the vanguard rising above the workers.

Ah, yeah, ok. After the revolution, I am very fond of Lenin's "better fewer, but better" comment. it is definitely to keep the party separate as an organ to direct the working class and the state, as opposed to an bureaucratic officiary.

And anybody who says that ICBM's are 40's techology really does not know how nuclar weapons progam is all about. Nor do they know the lifespan of a warehead.

Also I have no intrest in your ways or ideas, as who you fight against. Your just the other side of the spectrum. I'd rather go down my own road then be run be a colletivist group of the masses.