|
|
| What's the best kind of Tentacle? |
| Octopus, with Suction Cups, swoon! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Smooth and sleek; somewhat phallic! |
|
46% |
[ 6 ] |
| With little mouths at the ends (teeth optional!) |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| With extra mini-tentacles at the ends, for her pleasure! |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
| The kind that have jellyfish stingers on them! Shocking! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| I don't care, just as long as they're tentacles! |
|
38% |
[ 5 ] |
| Other! Ray is so unimaginative to not have included MY favorite sort! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 9:03 am
Umm... we so don't have the technology for force field condoms. Yeah but whose voide wouold they be activated by?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 12:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 8:38 pm
Kaiou Elios Umm... we so don't have the technology for force field condoms. Yeah but whose voide wouold they be activated by? Exactly. EXACTLY. First of all, the idea for force-field condoms is an act of unmigitated genius on my part. I mean. Seriously. Think about it. It would be mere atoms thick. Absolutely no loss of sensation, the man can't use the whole "it doesn't feel the same" as an excuse. In fact, it perhaps would not even actually have to BLOCK the emission of sperm. It would merely have to ... "sterilize" them. I don't just mean "kill" them, because dead sperm can fertilize eggs just as happily as live sperm. It'd have to do something to break the DNA or something. *wanders off on a tangent* You know, it could even ... like ... not actually be a force field around the p***s/tentacle. It could be a field generated by a small object attached around the base of the p***s, say, a futuristic c**k ring, that acts like a microscopic blender, turning the sperm cells into so much frothy goo. And it could like, disinfect things while it was at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 7:19 am
Rayinte Kaiou Elios Umm... we so don't have the technology for force field condoms. Yeah but whose voide wouold they be activated by? Exactly. EXACTLY. First of all, the idea for force-field condoms is an act of unmigitated genius on my part. I mean. Seriously. Think about it. It would be mere atoms thick. Absolutely no loss of sensation, the man can't use the whole "it doesn't feel the same" as an excuse. In fact, it perhaps would not even actually have to BLOCK the emission of sperm. It would merely have to ... "sterilize" them. I don't just mean "kill" them, because dead sperm can fertilize eggs just as happily as live sperm. It'd have to do something to break the DNA or something. *wanders off on a tangent* You know, it could even ... like ... not actually be a force field around the p***s/tentacle. It could be a field generated by a small object attached around the base of the p***s, say, a futuristic c**k ring, that acts like a microscopic blender, turning the sperm cells into so much frothy goo. And it could like, disinfect things while it was at it. You are making the sexual act a very daunting melange of energy fields and sterilizing rays. This condomo del futuro is a little scary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:56 am
If you just want something to break the little spermies up, so go the frequency route. Much easier then forcefields and the technology is avalibe now.
Or of course, considering tentacles are going to be given appendage, not somehting by birthright, you could always just give one's that don't create actual sperm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 7:16 pm
McKenzie Or of course, considering tentacles are going to be given appendage, not somehting by birthright, you could always just give one's that don't create actual sperm. Right, right, I was tangenting off on the route of regular condoms. whee Arkadi, hon, don't you know? Science is Sex's best friend. It's why I find stereotypical scrawny geek types so appealing, even if I don't find them sexually attractive. Because I know that they're the sorts who'll do most of the gruntwork when it comes to innovative new sex toys and the like. Hell. Science figures hugely in me having any chance of acheiving Impossible Fantasy #3. Which, actually, is probably the one that, out of all my impossible fantasies, is the most "possible" given the current level of technology. *grin* I just have to figure out how to get me and a partner into orbit. Freefall... mmm... But really, I'm sure that technology will come up with even more interesting methods of birth control, ones that don't involve crazy force fields or sterilization beams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Well, there are currently more interesting forms of birthcontrol. Most women however don't like the idea of a hot pocker being shoved up their lower regions biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 8:44 am
McKenzie Well, there are currently more interesting forms of birthcontrol. Most women however don't like the idea of a hot pocker being shoved up their lower regions biggrin That's not interesting, that's nerve-damaging. Yeow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 1:19 pm
Well there's always those cool zappy noise lazers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 7:43 pm
Zappy noise lazers? What the hell are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Someone edited my post XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:14 pm
Pyew, pyew is the official noise a laser makes.
Whenever I happen to play the role of a tentamonster, my appendages tend to be...hm. Textured, shall we say. Nubbly.
Not to say spiky. >>;
Possibly with tiny micro-manipulators all along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 1:07 pm
I demand some sort of drawing of your tentacles X3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:07 am
McKenzie I demand some sort of drawing of your tentacles X3 Last two panels. >>; Though, that's not exactly it. Just sort of close. If you picture the spiky bits a little more rounded-off and the aforementioned microtentacles, you've got it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:40 am
Fine then, I demand a BETTER picture!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
