|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 pm
thats odd to me confused girl don't need c**k to do something ! whee
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:01 pm
I have my fill of p***s when I'm reading yaoi, thank you very much! A girl with a p***s is just... Ew. confused
That's basically like... Putting a man into the yuri to make it hentai. It doesn't do it for me, folks! gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:36 pm
Enyaron Ah okayies X_x I tryied to be vague =/ but yeh xD x3 sadly yes =/ it didn't turn out so well because it was like putting my fingers into a mail box =/ Apart from that it felt slimey X_x and I don't mean mildly I mean like putting your fingers in wet thick glue =/ which was hardly pleasureable for myself so I skippied it and got on with the rest xD x3 Wow....um....That sounds really strange o.O A...mailbox? And I believe that you -can- get better results with fingers. Adding toys makes it feel so...impersonal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:36 am
bishielurfer Enyaron Ah okayies X_x I tryied to be vague =/ but yeh xD x3 sadly yes =/ it didn't turn out so well because it was like putting my fingers into a mail box =/ Apart from that it felt slimey X_x and I don't mean mildly I mean like putting your fingers in wet thick glue =/ which was hardly pleasureable for myself so I skippied it and got on with the rest xD x3 Wow....um....That sounds really strange o.O A...mailbox? And I believe that you -can- get better results with fingers. Adding toys makes it feel so...impersonal. Yeah, I kind of feel that way too. It's definitely much more intimate-feeling if you go at it flesh on flesh. Anything else can make for great kink, but...you know, at least the first time, in my opinion.
And, well, Enya...that's what girl feels like? XD It's a natural product of the body intended as lubricant, so. I don't see anything weird about it. And yeah, manual doesn't physically stimulate the "active" person, but it works just fine when it's mutual or if you're into pleasing your partner.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:35 pm
Phallic toys are seen as elements of domination, now in real life and talking out of experience, they are freaking overrated.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:58 pm
I don't think it is so much a fact of "not being able to imaging lovemaking between two women" as much as the belief that "No relationship can exist without a dominant and submissive pairing" and that in most of society, having a p***s, or toy, and the act of penetration is showing dominance. In my case and my relationship, the use of toys and objects is commonplace, just because I am submissive and like the feeling of my lover "Taking" me. The look of a male body is not interesting to me in a sexual manner, but the curves of my girlfriend flow smoothly into the wearing of a phallus. I guess it is all a part of ones viewpoint and tastes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:36 pm
For-Chan Cookie Ok, I've got a question. How do you feel about phalluses in your girl on girl erotica? Personally, if I'm reading that kind of stuff, I'm not there for a mock c**k and I'd rather read about the girls than their various toys. If I want to read about a c**k, I'll pick up some het or yaoi. I'm not saying that they shouldn't use them ever, I just notice that they're used way too much. If you're reading girl/girl material, shouldn't it focus on the girls? If anything, the strong presence of the phallus in girl love material suggests that the people producing it see this as some sort of deficiency on the girls' parts. They do not have a c**k, therefore they must make up for that lack with a fake one. Obviously, the only way to stimulate their partner is through insertion of a phallic item be it fingers or toys or whatever. I think that's BS. I don't hate the c**k, I just resent how it's often made out as a compulsory item required for all erotica. It's not! You don't need a d***o, vibrator, strap-on, cucumber, banana, or whatever else you can think of. You just need two girls and a spark of attraction. Really, that's all it takes. So can we tone down the c**k please? So, how do you feel about the phalluses in your erotica? Don't care? Like them? Hate them? Think they're ok in moderation? Discuss, while keeping PG-13 please. I think that the use of phallic elements in yuri kindfa defeats the purpose of girl-on-girl action... I mean fakey ones are okay... but certainly not attached to someones body organically... liek a guy... Thaen it becomes just plain hentai and not yuri.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:19 am
Rush_Hardroc I think that the use of phallic elements in yuri kindfa defeats the purpose of girl-on-girl action... I mean fakey ones are okay... but certainly not attached to someones body organically... liek a guy... Thaen it becomes just plain hentai and not yuri. Actually , then it becomes futanari
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:34 am
Yeah.... I see what you mean... Fact of the matter remains: No penors in my yuriiiii!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:05 am
I don't watch much hentai so to speak, but I can't help but think what would Yaoi fans think if one of the two boys suddenly developed a certain female area? confused
It does seem kind of odd the fact that people portray that women need a male part to actually enjoy sex, because I highly doubt it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:47 pm
Yuudai Sasaki I don't watch much hentai so to speak, but I can't help but think what would Yaoi fans think if one of the two boys suddenly developed a certain female area? confused It does seem kind of odd the fact that people portray that women need a male part to actually enjoy sex, because I highly doubt it. That is a most excellent comparison, hahahaha. You're right, I think most people would do a complete double-take, yet it's not seen as odd when a girl develops penile bits in girl-on-girl works. Silly double-standard, really.
We certainly don't. Lesbians get along just fine with complete absence of guy and p***s. Sex doesn't have to involve phallic penetration. Besides, if we really wanted dicks, we could go out and buy some--any size we want, and there will never be any erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation. Totally free of the need for birth control, too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:49 pm
as many of you said, the penin is pretty disturbing when you want just a simple girl on girl story/action. same disturbing as a guy saying that two girls can have a sexual act because there is no p***s penetration!!! stressed stressed stressed stressed stressed
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:33 pm
heart I usually like them but occasionally I don't. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|