|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:59 am
Lock downs are a nice control, but I personally can't stand them. It makes for a painfully long and slow game, and if you're at the other end you want to kill yourself. Lock down = sadism?
I guess that's why I'll always be a Timmy. I like my decks to be slutty.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:36 pm
Pure johny player. Like right now I'm thinking of making some no net-decked version of a volcano helion and stuffy doll. the two can lead to a turn 6 win, with no mana acceleration. I know there a decks that literally do a turn one win, but thats no fun.
My favorite deck right now hs to be the B/W I'm building, it's going to focus on reanimation, creature theft, life gain, and land destruction. thatseems like a lot but it really isn't. If I could fit hand destruction into it, I would.
Angel of despair, debtor's knell things like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:28 am
Combo all my decks are useing swarm & slam twisted
little fire is no problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:49 pm
Lady Visara Pure johny player. Like right now I'm thinking of making some no net-decked version of a volcano helion and stuffy doll. the two can lead to a turn 6 win, with no mana acceleration. I know there a decks that literally do a turn one win, but thats no fun. My favorite deck right now hs to be the B/W I'm building, it's going to focus on reanimation, creature theft, life gain, and land destruction. thatseems like a lot but it really isn't. If I could fit hand destruction into it, I would. Angel of despair, debtor's knell things like that. Angel of Despair with Momentary Blink is just evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:40 pm
Lady Visara Pure johny player. Like right now I'm thinking of making some no net-decked version of a volcano helion and stuffy doll. the two can lead to a turn 6 win, with no mana acceleration. I know there a decks that literally do a turn one win, but thats no fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:16 am
Assuming the lack of a completely unstoppable combo deck in the format, your best bet is to play control. Control decks allow you to outplay your opponent to win, and can fit most of the answers it needs to win within the main and sideboard. Throw in some card draw, allowing you to find those answers, and your winning percentage becomes astronomical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:54 pm
I have to say control. It can outlast aggro, and it doesn't need specific pieces to go off like combo.
ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 8:24 am
Oddesy burn deck FTW, burn kicks a** when youve got the right cards, and its an extended deck smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:18 am
I dont have trouble using any of them. In fact, my red, white, and black deck is capable of all three without using the sideboard. The problem with people sticking to certain strategies is that like a game of roshambo, one just stomps the others. Ive found its why many people dislike control decks that win by decking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:08 pm
As Johnny as I am, or claim to be, I've been alternating between a BW control deck and various aggro decks (most notably a BR Hellbend/madness concoction and a wRG behemoth that splashed white just for hierarchs and helixes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:22 pm
I got to go control for me. When I first got into MTG I would of said aggro, but now it's mostly control at least in some part in my decks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:56 am
Control with artifacts from alara and Aggro with jund and goblins.....fun,fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
