|
|
| Do you wish to enact the proposed constitution? (see first post for details) (You must post your vote at the end of this thread to prevent cheating) |
| Enact the Constitution |
|
100% |
[ 4 ] |
| Do not Enact the Constitution |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:52 pm
I think the order should be:
1
2
3
5
4
6
7
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:57 pm
Aperium Quote: 1. Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing.
2. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing.
3. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision.
4. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at least thirty-five (35) days and again, two (2) days before the vote is set to take place.
5. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/
6. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision.
7. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition. There appears to be possible a time conflict between the 30 days in #2 and the 35 days in #4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:32 am
Quote: 1. Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing.
2. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing.
3. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision.
4. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period /*Changed to prevent possible time conflicts*/ and again, two (2) days before the vote is set to take place.
5. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/
6. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision.
7. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:16 am
Quote: 1. Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing.
2. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing.
3. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision.
4. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period /*Changed to prevent possible time conflicts*/ and again, at the beginning of the voting period./*Changed to simplify the process.*/
5. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/
6. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision.
7. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:49 pm
Quote: 1. Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing.
2. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing.
3. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision.
5. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/
4. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period /*Changed to prevent possible time conflicts*/ and again, at the beginning of the voting period./*Changed to simplify the process.*/
6. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision.
7. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition. The above in paragaph form is: Quote: Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/ All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period /*Changed to prevent possible time conflicts*/ and again, at the beginning of the voting period./*Changed to simplify the process.*/ In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:17 pm
Quote: Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members of members in good standing. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation for thirty (30) days in length and open to all members in good standing. At the end of the deliberation period, a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period and again, at the beginning of the voting period. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:36 pm
Quote: 1. Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members /*Changed to prevent mathematical related confusion, can be amended later*/ of members in good standing.
2. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation between thirty (30) and thirty-five (35) /*Changed to provide some time flexibility*/ days in length and open to all members in good standing.
3. At the end of the deliberation period a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision.
5. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. /*Changed to prevent an indefinitely delayed vote*/
4. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period /*Changed to prevent possible time conflicts*/ and again, at the beginning of the voting period./*Changed to simplify the process.*/
6. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision.
7. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:08 pm
Quote: Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members of members in good standing. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation between thirty (30) and thirty-five (35) days in length and open to all members in good standing. At the end of the deliberation period, a vote must be held within with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period and again, at the beginning of the voting period. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:25 pm
With Grammar correction! Quote: Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members in good standing. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation between thirty (30) and thirty-five (35) days in length and open to all members in good standing. At the end of the deliberation period, a vote must be held with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period and again, at the beginning of the voting period. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:29 pm
Constitution to be voted on: Quote: Any proposed revision to the constitution must first be submitted to the whole membership by petition of at least two members in good standing. At the completion of the petition, the proposed revision must be subject to a period of discussion and deliberation between thirty (30) and thirty-five (35) days in length and open to all members in good standing. At the end of the deliberation period, a vote must be held with the ability to either confirm or deny the enactment of the revision. All members in good standing must be given the opportunity to vote on the proposed revision over a period of fifteen (15) days, beginning within seven (7) days of the end of the deliberation period. All members in good standing must be notified of the proposed revision and the date of the vote at the start of the deliberation period and again, at the beginning of the voting period. In order for such a proposed revision to be enacted, at least three-fifths (3/5) of all voting members must vote in favor of enacting the proposed revision. If the proposition is denied enactment, the proposition must restart the above process with the petition.
A)Enact the Constitution, or
B)Do Not Enact the Constitution?Post your vote below. PS: Your vote(singular) must be visible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:38 pm
I, Myslec, hereby vote to (A) enact the constitution. *In the coming months I fully plan to further amend this article, but for now it is good enough*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:39 pm
I, Aperium, hereby vote to (A) Enact the Constitution.
*I agree with Myslec on the topic of future amendments.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 5:04 pm
I cast my vote in favour of 'A)Enact the Constitution'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:29 am
Isn't this in effect the same as passing a blank constitution?
It does nothing but establish how to establish things, which we are already capable of; i.e. this thread.
I'm not against it, but how is it necesary/effective?
Is this just so we can have a Constitution?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
