|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:51 am
Same for me. For the most part, police stations aren't funded to keep the peace anymore. They are there to attract homeowners. However, if you aren't breaking any laws, and you maintain a calm demeanor, they really can't do anything...especially if you're videotaping the whole event. If SNCC and other Black rights groups hadn't had the media on them at all times, all of them would have been murdered within the hour.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:16 am
X-Raziel Hotokashi-X Not true. If you have a president & congress on the same side with the majority of the same goals, then you can really make things happen. In American history: FDR passed hundreds of new programs and passed dozens of laws, which led to enhanced worker's rights, and a dramatic decrease in unemployment (Even Stalin couldn't have gotten more people employed). LBJ did the same for the Great Society. Now (Hopefully) Obama can do the same. We do not need to murder anyone or revolt against anything. Just like MLK, all you have to do is show how bad things really are for the everyday Joe and people (including congress) will listen. This assumes that Obama will rule the US in the interests of the oppressed. This is fundamentally false. Citing MLK is a little... I don't know the word. Fact is, by engagin in non-violent and non-working class centred protests, they were shot, clubbed and set upon by police dogs. Who got the civil rights struggle won, was not MLK's paciifists, but groups like the Panthers Quote: Not true. Weapons only complicate the situation. I became a junior cops, did the paramilitary training and law training. I know how they work. Being calm and non-submissive is the best tactic. State your rights if you strike. They can't bust Union strikes. Um... Tank, I think you know a little more on US strikes being shot... Maybe you shhould deal with this one... Quote: Exactly. Once you have everyone in a particular place on the same team, all working together for the good of the state, then NOBODY can take away a revolution of the masses. It not only shows the discontent the people are going through, but also the ineffectiveness of the old government. In Democratic societies, this works flawlessly; however, in Totalitarian states, the Communists might get outside intervention. i.e. UN peacekeepers, USA marines, etc. That implies everyone will be on the same side. They won't. There will be those wanting more radical demands, and those saying 'no, don't: if you do then the capitalists will be mean and hurt us' and even those saying 'no, don't: it is wrong to deny the capitalists the fruit of their investments'... Kotka: eh, pretty much... Also, you really shouldn't enter chat when I am eating apple pie and explaining my organic political lineage to my mother...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 10:19 am
Louis-Auguste Robespierre This assumes that Obama will rule the US in the interests of the oppressed. This is fundamentally false. Citing MLK is a little... I don't know the word. Fact is, by engaging in non-violent and non-working class centered protests, they were shot, clubbed and set upon by police dogs. Who got the civil rights struggle won, was not MLK's pacifists, but groups like the Panthers No it wasn't. MLK and the nonaggression supporters actually got two civil rights laws passed, a voting law passed, and reached a WOLRDWIDE audience. They got national troops to protect them when they were being attacked. Even Malcolm X, a civil rights activist, changed his mind. He originally preached self-defense when conflicts arose, and black power, and black unity. He told the world that black people no longer should align themselves with anyone but their own kind. After traveling to Mecca, he changed his mind and supported MLK and true nonviolence. Your right, citing MLK, LBJ, and Ghandi are a little jaded. They're fifty years...a hundred years past. That said, why do you still cite Marx, Trotsky, or Engels? See my point? Quote: That implies everyone will be on the same side. They won't. There will be those wanting more radical demands, and those saying 'no, don't: if you do then the capitalists will be mean and hurt us' and even those saying 'no, don't: it is wrong to deny the capitalists the fruit of their investments'... Your right. There will be radicals. There will be conservatives. Something tells me that when the time comes, they will choose conflict with their oppressors rather than fighting amongst themselves. Mao/Chiang v Japan anyone?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 5:28 pm
Quote: No it wasn't. MLK and the nonaggression supporters actually got two civil rights laws passed, a voting law passed, and reached a WOLRDWIDE audience. They got national troops to protect them when they were being attacked. No, it was the black soldiers coming back from occupying other countries, after not getting treated like s**t, the soldiers coming back from Vietnam and realising they were fighting a war for 'freedoms' they didn't even have. When they came back, they engaged in militant armed struggle. Their methods were flawed because they relied on black alone, and didn't seek to mobilise the black working class together with the white working class. Just as in India, it wasn't Gandhi that won independence, but the terrorists in the north Quote: Your right, citing MLK, LBJ, and Ghandi are a little jaded. They're fifty years...a hundred years past. That said, why do you still cite Marx, Trotsky, or Engels? See my point? Actually, I said you were wrong because they didn't achieve anything, but rather served to derail social struggle. Don't try and twist that into saying they are wrong because they are old. They are not. They are wrong for a whole host of other problems. Quote: Your right. There will be radicals. There will be conservatives. Something tells me that when the time comes, they will choose conflict with their oppressors rather than fighting amongst themselves. French Revolution: The war against the counter-revolutionaries and coalition was only won when all the non-Jacobin factions in Paris were destroyed. Russian Revolution: The Mensheviks, Right SR's and later Left SR's fought against the Soviets. Spartacus Bund Uprising in Germany: The Social-Democrats drowned the Communists in blood, relying on the fascistic Frei Korps to maintain the capitalist state.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:43 pm
Sorry, I can't help but be cynical about police brutality. Here is a recent example. (You can probably find a vid of the guy in the last link. He was just walking calmly by...he did nothing.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:51 pm
Quote: No, it was the black soldiers coming back from occupying other countries, after not getting treated like s**t, the soldiers coming back from Vietnam and realizing they were fighting a war for 'freedoms' they didn't even have. When they came back, they engaged in militant armed struggle. Their methods were flawed because they relied on black alone, and didn't seek to mobilize the black working class together with the white working class. Um...sorry no? I'm talking about 3 years before that when the government stepped into the South to ensure that African Americans could vote and exist in a de jure desegregated society. You are confusing the Black supremacy movement later on that dealt with de facto segregation. That's when Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammad, and other Black Leaders started leaning towards self defense and aggression. Stokely Carmichael (and later Malcolm X) realized that this wasn't right. "For the last time, 'Black Power' means black people coming together to form a political force and either electing representatives or forcing their representatives to speak their needs." I do see your point that history has and will continue to repeat itself, but I'm never going to accept the fact that violence and opposition are the keys to unlock a communist state. I believe that it is unity that will bring us there.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:15 pm
Of course unity is what will win, but it will be unity of the sort that has won every other revolution: The unity of the revolutionary forces against moderation and couter-revolution.
A revolution is a living struggle, in it people from different parties and groupings switch sides. The unity I speak of is when the majority of the progressive forces come together under the same banner, this in practice will mean the one party, to resolutely destroy all opposition.
Now, no doubt you and the other 'indulgents', if you will permit me to slip into French for a little, will accuse me of wanting to kill the opposition. Not at all. When I say destroy the opposition, I mean deprive it of the support of the population and legitimacy, rendering it powerless as a popular and mass force within the revolution.
That they will then side with counter-revolution in order to enforce their moderation on the revolution, in the process giving up their former pretensions to progress and acting against the revolution through military means NECESSITATING their eradication through fire, only proves my point that when it comes to the crunch, it will be a military struggle between the oppressors and the oppressed: The bourgeoisie and landlords on one side, and the proletariat and lower peasantry on the other.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Comrade Kotka Sorry, I can't help but be cynical about police brutality. Here is a recent example. (You can probably find a vid of the guy in the last link. He was just walking calmly by...he did nothing.) Nice links.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:27 pm
Louis-Auguste Robespierre He's a good blogger! Especially good earlier this year during the attack on Gaza. But yeah, G20 protests... seen a few videos of unprovoked police brutality from that. In some places, it's illegal to record police or something (I wonder why..). Gah, can't remember where. It was either somewhere in America or Britain.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:31 pm
In britain.
You cannot take record (in stills or moving pictures or even other documents) of police engaged in counter-terrorism activities.
of course the centre and right defend this saying it is only limited to 'counter-terrorism' but we all know that it will be used to crack down on things like those videos.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:33 pm
Well yes, there's a post on Lenin's Tomb about police being allowed to arrest protesters on terrorism charges too. I'll see if I can find it and I'll link it in this post... Hm, this one has a bit at the end, but I swear there was another. Oh well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:48 pm
About police terror...Quote: OAKLAND—The coldblooded execution of Oscar Grant III, a young black apprentice grocery butcher and father of a four-year-old girl, by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) cop Johannes Mehserle in the early morning hours of New Year’s Day threw a spotlight on the deadly police terror that is a fact of life for black people in racist America. The video images taken by horrified BART passengers showed Mehserle stand over Grant, methodically draw his Sig Sauer P226 semiautomatic and fire into Grant’s back as another cop held him face down with his hands behind his back. At protests after the brutal killing, demonstrators have carried signs reading “We Are All Oscar Grant” (see “Oscar Grant Killed in Cold Blood by BART Cop,” WV No. 928, 16 January). The killing of Grant in Oakland, where liberal black Democrat Ron Dellums is mayor, brutally exposes the hoax that the election of a black man, Barack Obama, as U.S. president represents progress toward black equality. Underlining the fallacy of such illusions, in Chicago police killed two black men during a five-day period in March, while the NYPD killed two people in April. Obama’s “stimulus package” for the moribund U.S. economy includes plans to spend billions to beef up the police by hiring 100,000 more thugs in blue: any prospect of a decent job is fading fast for millions of laid-off workers and unemployed youth, but the ruling class has plenty of money to pay its hired guns to intimidate and repress the ghetto masses and those who might protest being thrown on capitalism’s scrap heap. “When is this going to stop?” cried a black man outside Grant’s memorial. “I’m sick of people acting like we deserve what we get, that because we are black, they can shoot us in the back and get away with it.” More than 1,000 people, largely black and Latino, turned out for the memorial on January 7. Later that night, protesters took their justified outrage to the streets of Oakland, where they were met by an army of Oakland cops (OPD) equipped with riot gear, helicopters and an armored vehicle. The cops fired tear gas and rubber bullets at the protesters and arrested more than 100 people. Among those arrested and slapped with felony charges were David Santos, a 16-year-old supporter of the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), and JR Valrey, a KPFA programmer and journalist for the San Francisco Bay View who was trying to photograph the police violence. Drop all charges against the anti-racist protesters! Along with the mailed fist of state repression came the velvet glove: the cops’ masters, from Dellums to California Attorney General Jerry Brown, stepped in to try to dampen the flames of protest with calls for an investigation of Grant’s killing. Behind them in trying to keep the peace was a cabal of black preachers and the newly formed Coalition Against Police Executions (CAPE), which hasn’t been heard from since late February. Echoed by the cringing reformist left, CAPE advanced various schemes for police reform while appealing for redress to state agencies and officials, from Dellums and Brown to the Feds.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:58 pm
Comrade Kotka Well yes, there's a post on Lenin's Tomb about police being allowed to arrest protesters on terrorism charges too. I'll see if I can find it and I'll link it in this post... Hm, this one has a bit at the end, but I swear there was another. Oh well. that Lenin boy Surely, it cannot be long before such repressive legislation is turned toward internal dissidents. In fact, to be clear, it already has been. And right here in Aus, we have anti-terror laws simillar to the Patriot Act and... The ABCC. For the Americans here: The ABCC is like the FBI directed at... The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), currently the most militant and decent union in the country...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 8:21 pm
Louis-Auguste Robespierre The ABCC. For the Americans here: The ABCC is like the FBI directed at... The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), currently the most militant and decent union in the country... F*cking John Howard. How on earth did anyone fall for his 'Aussie Battler' thing? -_-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 8:26 pm
Now, now. The ALP has promised to Keep the ABCC, even if they decided to rename it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|