|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:48 pm
~Chrono Signz~ I think a vampire would win out of speed and slickness. There very sly so to speak. What runs on four legs is faster than two? Vampires have the ability to... somewhat.. fast fwd time. Blinking, it's called. Perhaps it is that they slow the time.. and then move quickly through it. Weres have the all fours thing going for them... unless of course they're like a were-kangaroo or something.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:22 am
MikeeBoi1029 babyXphantom ~Chrono Signz~ I think a vampire would win out of speed and slickness. There very sly so to speak. What runs on four legs is faster than two? Vampires have the ability to... somewhat.. fast fwd time. Blinking, it's called. Perhaps it is that they slow the time.. and then move quickly through it. Weres have the all fours thing going for them... unless of course they're like a were-kangaroo or something. kangaroos are fast though arnt they? Yea, but they don't run on all fours. It would be hard for them to scale buildings, or other rough terrain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:36 pm
*Jumps on wolf and sinks teeth in and sucks still dry*
Vampires, no doubt about it. *Wipes mouth with arm*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:24 pm
lol my avi is made for this chat lol
werewolf strong fast and eat vamps lol
go werewolfs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:28 pm
eek
eee yea.
No.
Sorry, wrong.
All of ya's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:45 pm
i belive a vampire would win by the fact that we (vampires) can use mind control to make them rip them selfs to shreds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:50 pm
I say, the vampire and the werewolf just shank hands and go to the ice cream parlor and share a gallon of vanilla. >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:19 pm
Yep..second that notion. We should all just hold hands and sing kumbayaa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:12 am
I think vampires would win beacuase their rutless
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:48 pm
I would probably have to say that Vampires would win for the simple fact that they can heal themselves faster than humans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:43 pm
most werewolves can heal faster than vampires in general lore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:59 am
thats a tough question i think it depends on the vampire and the werewolf themselves. how intellegent each are and how powerful they are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:20 am
Werewolf. There are alot of messed up information about Vamps and werewolf. Like a Vamp has super strength and super speed if it's a pure bred. And werewolves are super dupa fast. And if those info wasn't right, that means vamps are only blood-sucking monsters (¬_¬) so yeah, werewolf!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
