|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:51 pm
Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 The Leninator! We're putting out a newsletter from the GCP comrades, if anyone would like to contribute just check out the thread in the GCP (click my sig), that's our part to aid the cause on a larger scale, some of us are printing out copies and distributing them In Real Life and we're trying to get subscribers on Gaia. I have no idea what the NCS is doing, the website you guys made didn't make it, but trying again wouldn't hurt eh? Clearing it out is what I mean, just starting over and publicising a bit better. My side project RS is eating up time with studying the local politics and seeing who kisses whose a**.... -_- Also looking over the town budget is like .... @_@ Town meeting time was also a pain... I still havent read through it.... but I will finish soon..... Oh by the way my election was the strongest... I won for local representative for part of my district for our local town meetings (we have representative annual town meetings) I had the most votes out of all other representatives in the entire town woot!!!! now its time to play the waiting game........... RS will soon rise...... Could always use the help on symbols and making the symbol look better ^.^ That sounds like my town though the budget is high due to wasteful spending and the dam town officials keep increasing their pay raises every tie. Glade you got in, all my town spots are taken by rich people that buy off votes, so getting in is hard because the fact people don't vote or are to vote is another problem. Yeah I got in with 397 votes lmao the highest in the election for local town meeting reps... Im looking for support but first have to play the game.... Already made a symbol but its too blatent lmao
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:58 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 The Leninator! We're putting out a newsletter from the GCP comrades, if anyone would like to contribute just check out the thread in the GCP (click my sig), that's our part to aid the cause on a larger scale, some of us are printing out copies and distributing them In Real Life and we're trying to get subscribers on Gaia. I have no idea what the NCS is doing, the website you guys made didn't make it, but trying again wouldn't hurt eh? Clearing it out is what I mean, just starting over and publicising a bit better. My side project RS is eating up time with studying the local politics and seeing who kisses whose a**.... -_- Also looking over the town budget is like .... @_@ Town meeting time was also a pain... I still havent read through it.... but I will finish soon..... Oh by the way my election was the strongest... I won for local representative for part of my district for our local town meetings (we have representative annual town meetings) I had the most votes out of all other representatives in the entire town woot!!!! now its time to play the waiting game........... RS will soon rise...... Could always use the help on symbols and making the symbol look better ^.^ That sounds like my town though the budget is high due to wasteful spending and the dam town officials keep increasing their pay raises every tie. Glade you got in, all my town spots are taken by rich people that buy off votes, so getting in is hard because the fact people don't vote or are to vote is another problem. Yeah I got in with 397 votes lmao the highest in the election for local town meeting reps... Im looking for support but first have to play the game.... Already made a symbol but its too blatent lmao  Is that a town record? The only way things will get better in towns if people become active, when they do the s**t that goes on will be reduced. Ohh I'm telling that your going to have a commie party going. Dam voters they are are drunk and as stupid as ever. Just joking though, I say are the scythes on the outside gear really necessary?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:05 pm
Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 The Leninator! We're putting out a newsletter from the GCP comrades, if anyone would like to contribute just check out the thread in the GCP (click my sig), that's our part to aid the cause on a larger scale, some of us are printing out copies and distributing them In Real Life and we're trying to get subscribers on Gaia. I have no idea what the NCS is doing, the website you guys made didn't make it, but trying again wouldn't hurt eh? Clearing it out is what I mean, just starting over and publicising a bit better. My side project RS is eating up time with studying the local politics and seeing who kisses whose a**.... -_- Also looking over the town budget is like .... @_@ Town meeting time was also a pain... I still havent read through it.... but I will finish soon..... Oh by the way my election was the strongest... I won for local representative for part of my district for our local town meetings (we have representative annual town meetings) I had the most votes out of all other representatives in the entire town woot!!!! now its time to play the waiting game........... RS will soon rise...... Could always use the help on symbols and making the symbol look better ^.^ That sounds like my town though the budget is high due to wasteful spending and the dam town officials keep increasing their pay raises every tie. Glade you got in, all my town spots are taken by rich people that buy off votes, so getting in is hard because the fact people don't vote or are to vote is another problem. Yeah I got in with 397 votes lmao the highest in the election for local town meeting reps... Im looking for support but first have to play the game.... Already made a symbol but its too blatent lmao  Is that a town record? The only way things will get better in towns if people become active, when they do the s**t that goes on will be reduced. Ohh I'm telling that your going to have a commie party going. Dam voters they are are drunk and as stupid as ever. Just joking though, I say are the scythes on the outside gear really necessary? Idk I like the scythes but thats just me. I like the scythe more then the sickle for agriculture but sickles make better S lol I am trying to round up people poteintally but its going to be difficult with most of my friends either non-voters or going off to other places for college and missing the votes... unless of course I could mail them the ballots....o.O
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:29 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 Steven Hawkings SoViEtTaNkT34 The Leninator! We're putting out a newsletter from the GCP comrades, if anyone would like to contribute just check out the thread in the GCP (click my sig), that's our part to aid the cause on a larger scale, some of us are printing out copies and distributing them In Real Life and we're trying to get subscribers on Gaia. I have no idea what the NCS is doing, the website you guys made didn't make it, but trying again wouldn't hurt eh? Clearing it out is what I mean, just starting over and publicising a bit better. My side project RS is eating up time with studying the local politics and seeing who kisses whose a**.... -_- Also looking over the town budget is like .... @_@ Town meeting time was also a pain... I still havent read through it.... but I will finish soon..... Oh by the way my election was the strongest... I won for local representative for part of my district for our local town meetings (we have representative annual town meetings) I had the most votes out of all other representatives in the entire town woot!!!! now its time to play the waiting game........... RS will soon rise...... Could always use the help on symbols and making the symbol look better ^.^ That sounds like my town though the budget is high due to wasteful spending and the dam town officials keep increasing their pay raises every tie. Glade you got in, all my town spots are taken by rich people that buy off votes, so getting in is hard because the fact people don't vote or are to vote is another problem. Yeah I got in with 397 votes lmao the highest in the election for local town meeting reps... Im looking for support but first have to play the game.... Already made a symbol but its too blatent lmao  Is that a town record? The only way things will get better in towns if people become active, when they do the s**t that goes on will be reduced. Ohh I'm telling that your going to have a commie party going. Dam voters they are are drunk and as stupid as ever. Just joking though, I say are the scythes on the outside gear really necessary? Idk I like the scythes but thats just me. I like the scythe more then the sickle for agriculture but sickles make better S lol I am trying to round up people potentially but its going to be difficult with most of my friends either non-voters or going off to other places for college and missing the votes... unless of course I could mail them the ballots....o.O Well the non-voters are easy drag there as or bribe them with something I mean they don't care, it can't be as bad as the others who use elderly people who has no idea what their doing to vote. As for the picture it's your call. It's still interesting.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:39 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 spiffaliffa Okay for start we needs to tweak "Communism" .... -.- as i think its a better base for bigger and better ideas .... (I my self like the Democracy -Socialism) Combo ..... (Vs. Democracy Capitalism(Capitalism which is crap) And Communism socialism) .... O_p And yes a website ... those are always fancy You do realize that we are a bunch of ideological sects of marxism.....right? ^^And that communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. Communism should be democratic. "Should" and depends on the definition of democratic.... Democratic Centralism is still democratic. Democratic Centralism also denies the free market leadership of capitalism to only our sects of ideological. We of course are not speaking of bourgeoise democracy, but of proletarian democracy, which is in fact more "democratic." In current bourgeoise democracy, one's material position in life determines one's political power, etc. Also people of lower social classes are not given the opportunities for education, etc., and tend to have lower polling turnouts. This is not democracy, where politicians can be bought and sold by corporations, etc, you know the drill. In a true proletarian democracy, every person would truly be considered as an equal. Administrators during the time of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have no greater personal benefits than anyone else in society, and could be removed at will. "true" proletarian democracy is the rise of materailism over idealism and the proletarain dictatorship of ideology which democratic centralism does infact create. Who will the representatives come from? What form of communism to begin with for we can go with a Federal approach with council communism but then again we can go with a more Unitarian form of communism which most of the worlds governments go by. Lower social classes depending on cultural relativity...... Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:03 pm
Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn ^^And that communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. Communism should be democratic. "Should" and depends on the definition of democratic.... Democratic Centralism is still democratic. Democratic Centralism also denies the free market leadership of capitalism to only our sects of ideological. We of course are not speaking of bourgeoise democracy, but of proletarian democracy, which is in fact more "democratic." In current bourgeoise democracy, one's material position in life determines one's political power, etc. Also people of lower social classes are not given the opportunities for education, etc., and tend to have lower polling turnouts. This is not democracy, where politicians can be bought and sold by corporations, etc, you know the drill. In a true proletarian democracy, every person would truly be considered as an equal. Administrators during the time of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have no greater personal benefits than anyone else in society, and could be removed at will. "true" proletarian democracy is the rise of materailism over idealism and the proletarain dictatorship of ideology which democratic centralism does infact create. Who will the representatives come from? What form of communism to begin with for we can go with a Federal approach with council communism but then again we can go with a more Unitarian form of communism which most of the worlds governments go by. Lower social classes depending on cultural relativity...... Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:21 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn ^^And that communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. Communism should be democratic. "Should" and depends on the definition of democratic.... Democratic Centralism is still democratic. Democratic Centralism also denies the free market leadership of capitalism to only our sects of ideological. We of course are not speaking of bourgeoise democracy, but of proletarian democracy, which is in fact more "democratic." In current bourgeoise democracy, one's material position in life determines one's political power, etc. Also people of lower social classes are not given the opportunities for education, etc., and tend to have lower polling turnouts. This is not democracy, where politicians can be bought and sold by corporations, etc, you know the drill. In a true proletarian democracy, every person would truly be considered as an equal. Administrators during the time of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have no greater personal benefits than anyone else in society, and could be removed at will. "true" proletarian democracy is the rise of materailism over idealism and the proletarain dictatorship of ideology which democratic centralism does infact create. Who will the representatives come from? What form of communism to begin with for we can go with a Federal approach with council communism but then again we can go with a more Unitarian form of communism which most of the worlds governments go by. Lower social classes depending on cultural relativity...... Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:30 pm
Lady Merewyn And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Oh but don't worry Tank! I'm here to take Merewyn's place now. mrgreen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:44 pm
Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn We of course are not speaking of bourgeoise democracy, but of proletarian democracy, which is in fact more "democratic." In current bourgeoise democracy, one's material position in life determines one's political power, etc. Also people of lower social classes are not given the opportunities for education, etc., and tend to have lower polling turnouts. This is not democracy, where politicians can be bought and sold by corporations, etc, you know the drill. In a true proletarian democracy, every person would truly be considered as an equal. Administrators during the time of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have no greater personal benefits than anyone else in society, and could be removed at will. "true" proletarian democracy is the rise of materailism over idealism and the proletarain dictatorship of ideology which democratic centralism does infact create. Who will the representatives come from? What form of communism to begin with for we can go with a Federal approach with council communism but then again we can go with a more Unitarian form of communism which most of the worlds governments go by. Lower social classes depending on cultural relativity...... Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Communism is inevitable no matter what actions. Capitalism will fail or will continue to reform and create socialism with unconscious knowing peoples of exactly what economic system they are in such as depicted in futuristic shows such as Ghost in the Shell where they are under Socialism. Nationalism is our number 1 enemy for it ideological concepts. Capitalism spreads internationalism with nations that go reactionary to capitalism feed off of nationalism. Nationalism has been our worst enemy since the post WW1 and Stalinization. To say capitalism is our number one threat is absurd for Nationalism has plagued every attempt thus far. Even Chavez is plagued by nationalism look at the date he wants to create "SOCIALISM IN ONE NATION" to mark theanniversary end of imperialism in their country *cough* nationlism *cough* . If capitalism does not make the surpression communist ideology will to attain its goals. This suppression can be seen within the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, North Korea etc etc. Seeing as the Soviet Union was not able to bring about globalist revolution it had to turn to natioanlism and spread its ideology through nationalism. The end justifies the means, if Capitalism uses the surpression it is better off for us, but if not we will do the same as depicted through history to attain our goals. What I am suggesting is not haveing the blame game fall upon us. Surpression of ideology is unavoidable. The change of ideology is unavoidable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:08 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn We of course are not speaking of bourgeoise democracy, but of proletarian democracy, which is in fact more "democratic." In current bourgeoise democracy, one's material position in life determines one's political power, etc. Also people of lower social classes are not given the opportunities for education, etc., and tend to have lower polling turnouts. This is not democracy, where politicians can be bought and sold by corporations, etc, you know the drill. In a true proletarian democracy, every person would truly be considered as an equal. Administrators during the time of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have no greater personal benefits than anyone else in society, and could be removed at will. "true" proletarian democracy is the rise of materailism over idealism and the proletarain dictatorship of ideology which democratic centralism does infact create. Who will the representatives come from? What form of communism to begin with for we can go with a Federal approach with council communism but then again we can go with a more Unitarian form of communism which most of the worlds governments go by. Lower social classes depending on cultural relativity...... Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Communism is inevitable no matter what actions. Capitalism will fail or will continue to reform and create socialism with unconscious knowing peoples of exactly what economic system they are in such as depicted in futuristic shows such as Ghost in the Shell where they are under Socialism. Nationalism is our number 1 enemy for it ideological concepts. Capitalism spreads internationalism with nations that go reactionary to capitalism feed off of nationalism. Nationalism has been our worst enemy since the post WW1 and Stalinization. To say capitalism is our number one threat is absurd for Nationalism has plagued every attempt thus far. Even Chavez is plagued by nationalism look at the date he wants to create "SOCIALISM IN ONE NATION" to mark theanniversary end of imperialism in their country *cough* nationlism *cough* . If capitalism does not make the surpression communist ideology will to attain its goals. This suppression can be seen within the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, North Korea etc etc. Seeing as the Soviet Union was not able to bring about globalist revolution it had to turn to natioanlism and spread its ideology through nationalism. The end justifies the means, if Capitalism uses the surpression it is better off for us, but if not we will do the same as depicted through history to attain our goals. What I am suggesting is not haveing the blame game fall upon us. Surpression of ideology is unavoidable. The change of ideology is unavoidable. Oh s**t, I feel sorry for taking this now Merewyn, he just referenced Ghost in the Shell. I know you would have loved to discuss Ghost in the Shell and it's political messages and how kickass Motoko is. But yes regardless of the situation that will happen regardless of how much free the market is, the realization of the current system and all that it entails will form in the consciousness of the Proletariat no matter what. Nationalism doesn't develop from such ideals that Merewyn has just expressed though. Nationalism indeed needs to be put out, however to rely on Capitalism to put these ideals out seems lazy and like an unreliable solution. Not to mention within my own views and ideas this present a problem, it brings indeed the possibility of revolution and a large and ready Proletariat within other nations (I'm assuming you speak of using Globalization to destroy Nationalism) but in the countries who are obviously dominant and slowly lessening their Proletariat, this actually brings us further and further away there. In your plan we simply complicate matters more than I think we need to. I would like to be done of Nationalism also myself, but the primary goal of Globalization does not accomplish that, it's goal is just to further Capitalist ideals, Nationalism being downplayed is not it's goal. IN fact in some ways it doesn't. We have all seen the anger of jobs being outsourced and large amounts of factories and industrial work being moved out of the country have we not? Those were certainly not Internationalist ideals being said by those people. I would go so far as to say the only people embracing this idea and presenting this only Internationalist policy are the Bourgeoisie themselves! So for me it just seems like a complication more than a solution (I apologize Mere if this was not exactly to your viewpoint, I can only argue this with my own opinions and things such).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:31 pm
Contra mundus SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Communism is inevitable no matter what actions. Capitalism will fail or will continue to reform and create socialism with unconscious knowing peoples of exactly what economic system they are in such as depicted in futuristic shows such as Ghost in the Shell where they are under Socialism. Nationalism is our number 1 enemy for it ideological concepts. Capitalism spreads internationalism with nations that go reactionary to capitalism feed off of nationalism. Nationalism has been our worst enemy since the post WW1 and Stalinization. To say capitalism is our number one threat is absurd for Nationalism has plagued every attempt thus far. Even Chavez is plagued by nationalism look at the date he wants to create "SOCIALISM IN ONE NATION" to mark theanniversary end of imperialism in their country *cough* nationlism *cough* . If capitalism does not make the surpression communist ideology will to attain its goals. This suppression can be seen within the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, North Korea etc etc. Seeing as the Soviet Union was not able to bring about globalist revolution it had to turn to natioanlism and spread its ideology through nationalism. The end justifies the means, if Capitalism uses the surpression it is better off for us, but if not we will do the same as depicted through history to attain our goals. What I am suggesting is not haveing the blame game fall upon us. Surpression of ideology is unavoidable. The change of ideology is unavoidable. Oh s**t, I feel sorry for taking this now Merewyn, he just referenced Ghost in the Shell. I know you would have loved to discuss Ghost in the Shell and it's political messages and how kickass Motoko is. But yes regardless of the situation that will happen regardless of how much free the market is, the realization of the current system and all that it entails will form in the consciousness of the Proletariat no matter what. Nationalism doesn't develop from such ideals that Merewyn has just expressed though. Nationalism indeed needs to be put out, however to rely on Capitalism to put these ideals out seems lazy and like an unreliable solution. Not to mention within my own views and ideas this present a problem, it brings indeed the possibility of revolution and a large and ready Proletariat within other nations (I'm assuming you speak of using Globalization to destroy Nationalism) but in the countries who are obviously dominant and slowly lessening their Proletariat, this actually brings us further and further away there. In your plan we simply complicate matters more than I think we need to. I would like to be done of Nationalism also myself, but the primary goal of Globalization does not accomplish that, it's goal is just to further Capitalist ideals, Nationalism being downplayed is not it's goal. IN fact in some ways it doesn't. We have all seen the anger of jobs being outsourced and large amounts of factories and industrial work being moved out of the country have we not? Those were certainly not Internationalist ideals being said by those people. I would go so far as to say the only people embracing this idea and presenting this only Internationalist policy are the Bourgeoisie themselves! So for me it just seems like a complication more than a solution (I apologize Mere if this was not exactly to your viewpoint, I can only argue this with my own opinions and things such). I disagree that it would complicate things. globalized capitalism will make it simplier, It made it easier for Marxist-Leninism did it not? With the exporting of jobs we create more conscious proletarait and more lumpen proletarait to the cause. We should allow the bourgeoisie to continue the internationalist exportation of jobs while having the lumpenproletarait (which in the US is the illegal immigrants of all sorts) to continue moving into the country. This will create more lumpen proletarait throughout the world and in 1st world nations due to standards of living. So infact what you say would complicate matters would simply increase our ideological boundaries..... and the proletarait mass..... It would only increase our chances on an international movement rather then prohibit them. .....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:45 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Contra mundus SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Communism is inevitable no matter what actions. Capitalism will fail or will continue to reform and create socialism with unconscious knowing peoples of exactly what economic system they are in such as depicted in futuristic shows such as Ghost in the Shell where they are under Socialism. Nationalism is our number 1 enemy for it ideological concepts. Capitalism spreads internationalism with nations that go reactionary to capitalism feed off of nationalism. Nationalism has been our worst enemy since the post WW1 and Stalinization. To say capitalism is our number one threat is absurd for Nationalism has plagued every attempt thus far. Even Chavez is plagued by nationalism look at the date he wants to create "SOCIALISM IN ONE NATION" to mark theanniversary end of imperialism in their country *cough* nationlism *cough* . If capitalism does not make the surpression communist ideology will to attain its goals. This suppression can be seen within the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, North Korea etc etc. Seeing as the Soviet Union was not able to bring about globalist revolution it had to turn to natioanlism and spread its ideology through nationalism. The end justifies the means, if Capitalism uses the surpression it is better off for us, but if not we will do the same as depicted through history to attain our goals. What I am suggesting is not haveing the blame game fall upon us. Surpression of ideology is unavoidable. The change of ideology is unavoidable. Oh s**t, I feel sorry for taking this now Merewyn, he just referenced Ghost in the Shell. I know you would have loved to discuss Ghost in the Shell and it's political messages and how kickass Motoko is. But yes regardless of the situation that will happen regardless of how much free the market is, the realization of the current system and all that it entails will form in the consciousness of the Proletariat no matter what. Nationalism doesn't develop from such ideals that Merewyn has just expressed though. Nationalism indeed needs to be put out, however to rely on Capitalism to put these ideals out seems lazy and like an unreliable solution. Not to mention within my own views and ideas this present a problem, it brings indeed the possibility of revolution and a large and ready Proletariat within other nations (I'm assuming you speak of using Globalization to destroy Nationalism) but in the countries who are obviously dominant and slowly lessening their Proletariat, this actually brings us further and further away there. In your plan we simply complicate matters more than I think we need to. I would like to be done of Nationalism also myself, but the primary goal of Globalization does not accomplish that, it's goal is just to further Capitalist ideals, Nationalism being downplayed is not it's goal. IN fact in some ways it doesn't. We have all seen the anger of jobs being outsourced and large amounts of factories and industrial work being moved out of the country have we not? Those were certainly not Internationalist ideals being said by those people. I would go so far as to say the only people embracing this idea and presenting this only Internationalist policy are the Bourgeoisie themselves! So for me it just seems like a complication more than a solution (I apologize Mere if this was not exactly to your viewpoint, I can only argue this with my own opinions and things such). I disagree that it would complicate things. globalized capitalism will make it simplier, It made it easier for Marxist-Leninism did it not? With the exporting of jobs we create more conscious proletarait and more lumpen proletarait to the cause. We should allow the bourgeoisie to continue the internationalist exportation of jobs while having the lumpenproletarait (which in the US is the illegal immigrants of all sorts) to continue moving into the country. This will create more lumpen proletarait throughout the world and in 1st world nations due to standards of living. So infact what you say would complicate matters would simply increase our ideological boundaries..... and the proletarait mass..... It would only increase our chances on an international movement rather then prohibit them. ..... Also how green card workers over a summer work has increased which in terms makes less jobs available, people say on the cape kids are lazy the fact is people wont hire them due to cheaper labor. Green cards are just another economic slavery, because any point in time they can be sent back. bush has allowed more and more into this country, why some say its ok, it just boost support for unfair treatment of citizens and there right to work and is turned down due to citizenship and the green card worker. Mere globization is nationalism were one culture is favored over another, and I can say is over the years I have seen me town to be a quite lazy town with a lot culture mainly French, English and Native American to a town were a person dosen't even know his next door neighbor sadly. globizaion isolate people off from each other even when they are connected, knowing a increase in in violence related to isolation? We seen in last year in Pennsylvanian. I don't even know Americas culture anymore. I know it because I experienced it and its something that dates back to the foundation of this country. While nationalism can be bad and is showing to be bad, its not entirely bad, since the driving unity behind communist or any other group a patriotic thing? While it's not like that in a full blown sense even communist can get that I think. But I agree that it is more harmful sine its about domination in all areas not just to workers of the state. And you can be patriotic and still have a brain in your head to know what is wrong and right, thats what its truly about is doing right. Or what I said could be just me being crazy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:37 am
Steven Hawkings Also how green card workers over a summer work has increased which in terms makes less jobs available, people say on the cape kids are lazy the fact is people wont hire them due to cheaper labor. Green cards are just another economic slavery, because any point in time they can be sent back. bush has allowed more and more into this country, why some say its ok, it just boost support for unfair treatment of citizens and there right to work and is turned down due to citizenship and the green card worker. Mere globization is nationalism were one culture is favored over another, and I can say is over the years I have seen me town to be a quite lazy town with a lot culture mainly French, English and Native American to a town were a person dosen't even know his next door neighbor sadly. globizaion isolate people off from each other even when they are connected, knowing a increase in in violence related to isolation? We seen in last year in Pennsylvanian. I don't even know Americas culture anymore. I know it because I experienced it and its something that dates back to the foundation of this country. While nationalism can be bad and is showing to be bad, its not entirely bad, since the driving unity behind communist or any other group a patriotic thing? While it's not like that in a full blown sense even communist can get that I think. But I agree that it is more harmful sine its about domination in all areas not just to workers of the state. And you can be patriotic and still have a brain in your head to know what is wrong and right, thats what its truly about is doing right. Or what I said could be just me being crazy. You stated exactly what I am talking about and how to create more Lumpen proletarait and proletaraits. You also just stated my arguement for pro capitalist globalization in helping the communist movement and must continue to create a larger global proletarait base. The Culture issue is exactly what I am going for with Globalism Cultural identity will be "mashed" together with wide spread cultural diffusion. Of course you will still have cultural differences but it is like "general theory" vs "regional theory" a "general culture" and a "regional culture." The idealist general culture would have to be non-other then science/technology vs idealism such as western religion ( xp to you Mary). That general culture will be the underlying basis while the regional such as local language etc would be part of the regional culture (even tho bi-lingual of a world language would probably be necessary....) This lack of cultural identity will spur off more globalism for a general culture which must be in our case for the sciences/material over the ideal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 2:56 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Contra mundus SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn SoViEtTaNkT34 Lady Merewyn Pft, and you know now that it is soooo on. Lenin calls for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be led by a vanguard of the working class. The state, any state, is, of course, a vehicle of suppression. The bourgeoise state is used to restrain and exploit the working masses while benefiting those in power. With the dictatorship of the proletariat, the roles will be reversed, and the power will be put into the hands of the working masses. The catch is that we must not allow one suppression to be replaced by another and stop there, in the way of many revolutions. No, we must do more, we must change the entire system through the dictatorship of the proletariat so that the need for suppression is completely removed. Then the entire need of a state of any sort will die away. "Democracy" is of course a type of state, but the term can also be used to refer to the principle of rule by the people. Once the administration of a society is performed by that society itself, we have an even more complete form of democracy than has ever been realized. The proletarait state is to change the former ideological with the new epistemological break ideological which in this case would be communist ideology. It is to replace Bourgeoisie ideology with a communist working class one, so of course it will be surpressing the former ideology. So of course our general ideology will be supressing the former general ideology such as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution which created Nationalism. Communism must do the same only crush nationalism with globalism and expand culture which is easier during the capitalist stage. If we allow the capitalist stage to continue the diffusion of culture and spreading anarchy of social production then the transfer would be easier. Nationalism will bring nothing democracy will do nothing if it is nationalized no matter what. Nationalism must be switched to globalism. We must not turn reactionary and fall into nationalism which is now reactionary to radical globalism. Now, to start with, we commies prefer the term "internationalism" wink Now... what you're advocating is allowing further suppression, from what I gather, in order to make our work easier in the end? No, because the future doesn't make itself, we make the future! Communism is inevitable only so long as our actions make it that way! It is a progression in dialectics only if people make that progression happen! Strengthening capitalism is reactionary in scope, when what we need to do is to weaken capitalism and strengthen socialist principles! The globalization of communication is inevitable, that much is clear already. Thanks to cell phones, the internet, videoconferencing, etc., ideas are transmitted rapidly to all corners of the globe. Nationalism is already being turned into globalism. Look at Gaia even, and see how many people are participating in cultural exchange right here right now. The bonds of the cultural side of nationalism are already being broken down in this way. What we must focus on is the economic and physical side of nationalism, but in doing so, we can't further strengthen capitalism, which is our real enemy, even more than nationalism! And now I'm off to see Spiderman, so you'll get a further and less hurried response later! Communism is inevitable no matter what actions. Capitalism will fail or will continue to reform and create socialism with unconscious knowing peoples of exactly what economic system they are in such as depicted in futuristic shows such as Ghost in the Shell where they are under Socialism. Nationalism is our number 1 enemy for it ideological concepts. Capitalism spreads internationalism with nations that go reactionary to capitalism feed off of nationalism. Nationalism has been our worst enemy since the post WW1 and Stalinization. To say capitalism is our number one threat is absurd for Nationalism has plagued every attempt thus far. Even Chavez is plagued by nationalism look at the date he wants to create "SOCIALISM IN ONE NATION" to mark theanniversary end of imperialism in their country *cough* nationlism *cough* . If capitalism does not make the surpression communist ideology will to attain its goals. This suppression can be seen within the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, North Korea etc etc. Seeing as the Soviet Union was not able to bring about globalist revolution it had to turn to natioanlism and spread its ideology through nationalism. The end justifies the means, if Capitalism uses the surpression it is better off for us, but if not we will do the same as depicted through history to attain our goals. What I am suggesting is not haveing the blame game fall upon us. Surpression of ideology is unavoidable. The change of ideology is unavoidable. Oh s**t, I feel sorry for taking this now Merewyn, he just referenced Ghost in the Shell. I know you would have loved to discuss Ghost in the Shell and it's political messages and how kickass Motoko is. But yes regardless of the situation that will happen regardless of how much free the market is, the realization of the current system and all that it entails will form in the consciousness of the Proletariat no matter what. Nationalism doesn't develop from such ideals that Merewyn has just expressed though. Nationalism indeed needs to be put out, however to rely on Capitalism to put these ideals out seems lazy and like an unreliable solution. Not to mention within my own views and ideas this present a problem, it brings indeed the possibility of revolution and a large and ready Proletariat within other nations (I'm assuming you speak of using Globalization to destroy Nationalism) but in the countries who are obviously dominant and slowly lessening their Proletariat, this actually brings us further and further away there. In your plan we simply complicate matters more than I think we need to. I would like to be done of Nationalism also myself, but the primary goal of Globalization does not accomplish that, it's goal is just to further Capitalist ideals, Nationalism being downplayed is not it's goal. IN fact in some ways it doesn't. We have all seen the anger of jobs being outsourced and large amounts of factories and industrial work being moved out of the country have we not? Those were certainly not Internationalist ideals being said by those people. I would go so far as to say the only people embracing this idea and presenting this only Internationalist policy are the Bourgeoisie themselves! So for me it just seems like a complication more than a solution (I apologize Mere if this was not exactly to your viewpoint, I can only argue this with my own opinions and things such). I disagree that it would complicate things. globalized capitalism will make it simplier, It made it easier for Marxist-Leninism did it not? With the exporting of jobs we create more conscious proletarait and more lumpen proletarait to the cause. We should allow the bourgeoisie to continue the internationalist exportation of jobs while having the lumpenproletarait (which in the US is the illegal immigrants of all sorts) to continue moving into the country. This will create more lumpen proletarait throughout the world and in 1st world nations due to standards of living. So infact what you say would complicate matters would simply increase our ideological boundaries..... and the proletarait mass..... It would only increase our chances on an international movement rather then prohibit them. ..... It will be a combination, we certainly can't make all of the reason Globalization. To me what you describe is temporary and did in fact pass my mind at one point while I typed my previous post, or at least perhaps. Something about the fact that less industrial jobs will mean more office service jobs, something the United States considers Middle class, though some of what I heard assumes this recently laid off people can just simply educate themselves in another job and work that, which is godawful unrealistic. However despite that again I must point out it doesn't drive them exactly into our arms. This people are upset that American companies have moved out of America, or that non-Americans receive benefits. That creates nationalism. In the countries receiving these factories and encroachment of Westerners and their society onto their native lands and culture is seen and angers many. They see they become antagonized and upset over that. No longer is the issue one of Capitalism, no it in the minds of these people become one of National Unity and keeping National interests and purity. The best this can do for us is perhaps drive a few of them into the more Nationalistic Marxist Parties or the minority who finally see this is simply not a minority issue. I will not say that Globalization hasn't opened up some interesting ideas created some situations. However to push it is again just making the eventual struggle harder in the long run.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:54 pm
Contra mundus It will be a combination, we certainly can't make all of the reason Globalization. To me what you describe is temporary and did in fact pass my mind at one point while I typed my previous post, or at least perhaps. Something about the fact that less industrial jobs will mean more office service jobs, something the United States considers Middle class, though some of what I heard assumes this recently laid off people can just simply educate themselves in another job and work that, which is godawful unrealistic. However despite that again I must point out it doesn't drive them exactly into our arms. This people are upset that American companies have moved out of America, or that non-Americans receive benefits. That creates nationalism. In the countries receiving these factories and encroachment of Westerners and their society onto their native lands and culture is seen and angers many. They see they become antagonized and upset over that. No longer is the issue one of Capitalism, no it in the minds of these people become one of National Unity and keeping National interests and purity. The best this can do for us is perhaps drive a few of them into the more Nationalistic Marxist Parties or the minority who finally see this is simply not a minority issue. I will not say that Globalization hasn't opened up some interesting ideas created some situations. However to push it is again just making the eventual struggle harder in the long run. If nationalism was the "death of empires" and its synthesis imperialism then what would perhaps Globalism vs Nationalism synthesis be? Doesnt matter what the westerner's do while they spread culture it is not on our hands nor in our name. It does not anger them against communist ideology it angers them about capitalism. If they wish to go reactionary nationalistic let them go into nationalistic pride isolation from the global market and see if they become self sufficent over time without aid/trade....(I have my doubts) Globalization does not create more problems unless you view more global proletarait and western influence upon the global population as a "bad thing." Marxism thrives off of westernization so wouldn't we have to be in support of westernization as a general culture for the entire globe to fullfill our overall distant ideal? If the supression is blamed upon the capitalists then let them be blamed upon but the supression that they create, creates more workers in other countries and creates less jobs so a larger unskilled workforce is unemployed. Globalism may create nationalism but it also creates more proletarait workers that are naturally conservative to industrialization. Even in India the 30% of the populace that works in the industrialized india would probably want to keep the status they are in and therefore will continue to use Western ideology and infulence upon their culture.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|