|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Cyanna Back when I lived in Kentucky people in our parish would be shocked at my parents and their five kids (I'm the oldest). Now in New Jersey we're kinda overshadowed by this one couple who has nine. xd Nine? And to think my poor mother struggled with three whee
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:28 pm
Most certainly a woman...unless...oh, never mind. Yes, I AM a woman!I've always been pro-life...and my friends...gah. All of my female friends are pro-choice...I am kind of a feminist, and whenever this topic comes up, and I end up debating AGAINST my fellow feminist friends...gah...just go jump off a cliff...well, anyways!...yes...woman...Caio!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:59 pm
I think I might be the generic pro-lifer. I am female, a teenager, Catholic, heterosexual, anti most wars, anti death penalty, sort of pro guns and so on and so forth. All bow down to my generic glory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:22 pm
Oh noes a man. Clearly you want imprison us all keep us from working ,make us wear poofy dresses, make us be pregnant 24/7 ,keep us from voting and umm make us have sex with you? *Is drenched in sarcasm*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:33 pm
reggie _chan Oh noes a man. Clearly you want imprison us all keep us from working ,make us wear poofy dresses, make us be pregnant 24/7 ,keep us from voting and umm make us have sex with you? *Is drenched in sarcasm* That he does. We all do, really. Because, you know, before 1972, women couldn't vote, wore poofy dresses, were pregnant 24/7/365, didn't work, and stayed barefoot in the kitchen. 1971 was a dark year indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:48 pm
lymelady reggie _chan Oh noes a man. Clearly you want imprison us all keep us from working ,make us wear poofy dresses, make us be pregnant 24/7 ,keep us from voting and umm make us have sex with you? *Is drenched in sarcasm* That he does. We all do, really. Because, you know, before 1972, women couldn't vote, wore poofy dresses, were pregnant 24/7/365, didn't work, and stayed barefoot in the kitchen. 1971 was a dark year indeed. Wait how could they be pregant all the time? Don't we give birth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:46 pm
I am a male. Despite what a certain friend of mine claims. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:05 pm
Conren I am a male. Despite what a certain friend of mine claims. XD Oh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:13 pm
I.Am lu-tze I.Am And worship crackers! xd Lots of kids always makes me think of "stereotypical" Catholics. I'm Catholic! But... I have no kids razz Well, not that I know of... And seeing as I have never donated or had sex then I assume I don't have any... Oh, I'm Male by the way. Well, I meant stereotypical married Catholics. XP I mean, my mom has 7 kids, and I'm the oldest. O.O That's insane. I'm Catholic too, btw. blaugh OK, I'm probably opening a can of worms here, but I have to ask, "Why is it insane to be open to having as many children as God sees fit to grace you with?" It's todays mentality that more than 2 or 3 kids is not normal that has the church in crisis today. If couples would stop using artificial birth control, think of the number of possible priests and religious we would have today. And in case you weren't aware of it, artificial contraception goes against church teaching. Anything that prevents the creation of life is just as wrong as the taking of it, once it has begun. If you don't follow the teachings of the church in their intirety, then don't call yourself Catholic, because you aren't. This is not a club, where you can pick and choose which rules you want to follow. You either follow them all, or you get out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:16 pm
reggie _chan I think I might be the generic pro-lifer. I am female, a teenager, Catholic, heterosexual, anti most wars, anti death penalty, sort of pro guns and so on and so forth. All bow down to my generic glory. OK reggie, I'll give you the "generic pro-lifer" title, but I get the "Geriatric Pro-lifer" title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:55 pm
Shanra the Bard reggie _chan I think I might be the generic pro-lifer. I am female, a teenager, Catholic, heterosexual, anti most wars, anti death penalty, sort of pro guns and so on and so forth. All bow down to my generic glory. OK reggie, I'll give you the "generic pro-lifer" title, but I get the "Geriatric Pro-lifer" title. Okay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:00 pm
Shanra the Bard I.Am lu-tze I.Am And worship crackers! xd Lots of kids always makes me think of "stereotypical" Catholics. I'm Catholic! But... I have no kids razz Well, not that I know of... And seeing as I have never donated or had sex then I assume I don't have any... Oh, I'm Male by the way. Well, I meant stereotypical married Catholics. XP I mean, my mom has 7 kids, and I'm the oldest. O.O That's insane. I'm Catholic too, btw. blaugh OK, I'm probably opening a can of worms here, but I have to ask, "Why is it insane to be open to having as many children as God sees fit to grace you with?" It's todays mentality that more than 2 or 3 kids is not normal that has the church in crisis today. If couples would stop using artificial birth control, think of the number of possible priests and religious we would have today. And in case you weren't aware of it, artificial contraception goes against church teaching. Anything that prevents the creation of life is just as wrong as the taking of it, once it has begun. If you don't follow the teachings of the church in their intirety, then don't call yourself Catholic, because you aren't. This is not a club, where you can pick and choose which rules you want to follow. You either follow them all, or you get out. I think you and I will get along well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:20 pm
Shanra the Bard And in case you weren't aware of it, artificial contraception goes against church teaching. Anything that prevents the creation of life is just as wrong as the taking of it, once it has begun. Hmm, so I suppose choosing to be celibate would go against church teachings? Shanra the Bard If you don't follow the teachings of the church in their intirety, then don't call yourself Catholic, because you aren't. This is not a club, where you can pick and choose which rules you want to follow. You either follow them all, or you get out. Actually in clubs you do have to follow the rules. Or else, they do kick you out. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:58 pm
Conren Shanra the Bard And in case you weren't aware of it, artificial contraception goes against church teaching. Anything that prevents the creation of life is just as wrong as the taking of it, once it has begun. Hmm, so I suppose choosing to be celibate would go against church teachings? The distinction here must be made: the Church teaches that any artificial prevention of conception is banned. Therefore, not having sex, or having sex during the time that the female isn't fertile (the technique of Natural Family Planning), isn't wrong. She (the Church) also teaches that doing something during sex with the intention of preventing conception is wrong, because it perverts the sexual act, making it simply the seeking of pleasure. This includes pulling out, as well as masturbation. By having sex when the woman is not fertile, you're using the natural infertility to avoid pregnancy, but there's always the chance for life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
