|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:51 am
My official response to a question of trust and of money: I, of course, wish for your trust, as a leader who, if elected, will be for the people. Of course, trust comes in many forms. No matter who is the victor in this particular election, we will both desire your monetary trust as well--for what guild can operate on no gold? The question is--how will your money be spent? I remind you of my opponents accusations of how I intend on spending the people's money, and how very untrue I had proven those allegations to be. Perhaps he accuses me of such absurd things to divert the public eye from his own notorious schemes involving you, the taxpayer's, money. He plans on spending your money on building villages and filling them with peasants. Now, anyone who is familiar with my opponent's past may have cringed at this. That's right folks. i like burnination intends to build villages and fill them with peasants so that he may burninate them. If I am elected crew, I promise to impose a law restricting burnination in every way, shape, and form. It's a shame that our guild currently allows such a hideous act. Vote for PirateEire! 
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:01 am
it seems PirateEire has misinterpreted some documents! you see, burnination simply is a keyword that means "shower with hospitality and good fortune". so with that in mine, indeed i do intend to burninate the people of those villages. i want to burninate the entire peoples of the world! i think my opponent should cease from jumping to conclusions before learning the entire backstory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:01 pm
I'm afraid I have photographic evidence of my opponent, burninating. I am sure you all will note that burnination is not what i like burnination or should I say i like MURDER claims that it is...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:06 pm
Oh my. What damning evidence! surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:05 pm
^I think that one may have backfired on you Pirate.
everyone knows Trogdor is the coolest. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:16 pm
Everyone?
... Not me. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:27 pm
Kari Seregon Everyone? ... Not me. ninja Trogdor is teh lame. I like Foamy though, or at least I used to. Now he is getting to be teh lame, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:20 pm
so then Pirate, you are saying that if anyone, even in jest, was to say "i'm going to bomb a building", you would immediatly take them into custody for being a terrorist? there isn't always a direct link between speech and action. i agree, though, that a sentence like that should be taken seriously, but certainly not damning evidence! also, tell me the differences between these sentences:
"let's watch the boob tube."
"women have boobs."
"stop this boobery!"
are you to say that the word "boob" and it's other forms have the same meaning in each sentence? that would be ridiculous to assume so. such is the case in my use of "burnination".
though i do not deny that i do admire Trogdor as a leader ... ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:39 pm
"Boobery." Teehee. That made me giggle. whee
@ Takai: Foamy owns. I love his rants; most are spot on, especially the one about Paris Hilton. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:43 am
Foamy annoys me. StrongBad and his creations hardly ever fail.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:28 am
i like burnination so then Pirate, you are saying that if anyone, even in jest, was to say "i'm going to bomb a building", you would immediatly take them into custody for being a terrorist? there isn't always a direct link between speech and action. i agree, though, that a sentence like that should be taken seriously, but certainly not damning evidence! also, tell me the differences between these sentences: "let's watch the boob tube." "women have boobs." "stop this boobery!" are you to say that the word "boob" and it's other forms have the same meaning in each sentence? that would be ridiculous to assume so. such is the case in my use of "burnination". though i do not deny that i do admire Trogdor as a leader ... ninja in Modern Society, if you just say bomb, and nothing else connected to it, you are still treated as if you have a bomb. If you say "I'm going to bomb this building", then you will be taken into custody, and building will be evacuated and searched, regardless of wether you say you're joking or not. They are required to do so, and it will be considered a bomb threat, which is a federal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:30 am
Rowena Marion Foamy annoys me. StrongBad and his creations hardly ever fail..... If you can get past the profuse swearing, Foamy is the best thing since sliced cheese. heart It's like he can read my mind... eek And I guess the other thing you're referring to is... that weird comic? Uh, can't think of the name, but those girls that say "Soooo goooood!" are part of that site, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:34 am
Se Ga Takai i like burnination so then Pirate, you are saying that if anyone, even in jest, was to say "i'm going to bomb a building", you would immediatly take them into custody for being a terrorist? there isn't always a direct link between speech and action. i agree, though, that a sentence like that should be taken seriously, but certainly not damning evidence! also, tell me the differences between these sentences: "let's watch the boob tube." "women have boobs." "stop this boobery!" are you to say that the word "boob" and it's other forms have the same meaning in each sentence? that would be ridiculous to assume so. such is the case in my use of "burnination". though i do not deny that i do admire Trogdor as a leader ... ninja in Modern Society, if you just say bomb, and nothing else connected to it, you are still treated as if you have a bomb. If you say "I'm going to bomb this building", then you will be taken into custody, and building will be evacuated and searched, regardless of wether you say you're joking or not. They are required to do so, and it will be considered a bomb threat, which is a federal offense. has PirateEire already bewitched you with her evil "magick"?! eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:04 pm
Kh! Takai is my campaign manager.
Anyway, those who spell magic with a k, are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:24 pm
i like burnination Se Ga Takai i like burnination so then Pirate, you are saying that if anyone, even in jest, was to say "i'm going to bomb a building", you would immediatly take them into custody for being a terrorist? there isn't always a direct link between speech and action. i agree, though, that a sentence like that should be taken seriously, but certainly not damning evidence! also, tell me the differences between these sentences: "let's watch the boob tube." "women have boobs." "stop this boobery!" are you to say that the word "boob" and it's other forms have the same meaning in each sentence? that would be ridiculous to assume so. such is the case in my use of "burnination". though i do not deny that i do admire Trogdor as a leader ... ninja in Modern Society, if you just say bomb, and nothing else connected to it, you are still treated as if you have a bomb. If you say "I'm going to bomb this building", then you will be taken into custody, and building will be evacuated and searched, regardless of wether you say you're joking or not. They are required to do so, and it will be considered a bomb threat, which is a federal offense. has PirateEire already bewitched you with her evil "magick"?! eek No, I just have this unseemly habit of thinking for myself, and noting logical fallacys made by other people. No "Magick" of any sort involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
